Girls/Women always look better without clothing

Attractive women sometimes look better wearing clothing?


  • Total voters
    130
She's a real winner.
 
Personally I am embarassed & revolted whenever I see a picture of a nude/semi nude women. That's probably because I'm gay.

I dont get revolted by women who are semi nude/nude. I just dont notice. I am a little afraid of vaginas.
 
Personally I am embarassed & revolted whenever I see a picture of a nude/semi nude women. That's probably because I'm gay.

How could the female body possibly embarrass you or make you feel revolted? I can understand that if you're gay you wouldn't be attracted necessarily, but embarrassed or revolted? How? Why?
 
Generally, no. Clothing is attractive.

Also, if you're a woman &/or a gay man feel free to describe how you feel about the clothed/unclothed male instead.

Junk is ugly. Keep your shorts on.
 
I don't have the personal experience to contribute.

But culture has deemed to say keep the clothes on! (for most of the time).
 
I agree with the tease aspect some have already commented on, and that leads me to simply saying they often look better nude, but to say always is wrong.
When it comes down to it human beings all look generally alike naked. Sure there's some variation in skin colors, body shapes etc. But aside from faces which generally have a good bit of variety, people don't look all that different naked. Clothing (like make up or hair styles) allow people to customize themselves into something unique, and at least in my opinion this type of variety is more important than anything.
Though obviously at some point in time it should come off, but certainly not at all times that would just be boring and rather quickly become mundane.
 
:agree: :lol:

CN2BY.jpg


Hey guys got any twinkies?

The 2nd chick doesn't even have boobs, just a blob of fat. Look you can totally where her arm/shoulder blob ends and the boob fat blob begins
 
i like my women like i like my strippers, fully nude.
 
*looks at the poll*

Y'all're bunch of prudes. :p

Pluto, the OP gave the options "attractive women always look better without clothing" vs. "attractive women sometimes look better with clothing"; it's pretty obvious that wording is going to skew the poll a bit. If it was simply "attractive women generally look better with/without clothing", it would be different.
 
Well when shes clothed I want see her naked. But generally I am dissapointed after girl pull off, in clothes she looked better. My fantasy works better than reality, so maybe thats reason. But I realy dont have big sample:cry:
 
Hell no. A women in a bikini or a nice slinky dress looks better than they do naked, for two reasons. First of all, it leaves things to the imagination, which is generally better than real life, and second, a good piece of clothing looks good, which only compliments the pretty woman.

This.

Little clothes is often more attractive than no clothes at all, not because they hide imperfections, but because they leave stuff to the imagination. And sexy pieces of clothing (including lingerie) often add spice to the whole scene.
 
Hell no. A women in a bikini or a nice slinky dress looks better than they do naked, for two reasons. First of all, it leaves things to the imagination, which is generally better than real life, and second, a good piece of clothing looks good, which only compliments the pretty woman.

Obviously, by the time you're naked, they're going to look better than when they're dressed, but that's mostly libido.

That is my reaction also. I think that there is nothing sexier on a woman that just a t-shirt and jeans. :drool:
 
I prefer clothing because of the imagination factor and the fact that it compliments the woman.
 
I'm not going to bother repeating what these good folks have already said:
Hell no. A women in a bikini or a nice slinky dress looks better than they do naked, for two reasons. First of all, it leaves things to the imagination, which is generally better than real life, and second, a good piece of clothing looks good, which only compliments the pretty woman.

Obviously, by the time you're naked, they're going to look better than when they're dressed, but that's mostly libido.

Even in the same pose, the right bikini bottom (or other garment flattering to her hips) would make that picture "hotter"

Generally, no. Clothing is attractive.



Junk is ugly. Keep your shorts on.

This.

Little clothes is often more attractive than no clothes at all, not because they hide imperfections, but because they leave stuff to the imagination. And sexy pieces of clothing (including lingerie) often add spice to the whole scene.

I prefer clothing because of the imagination factor and the fact that it compliments the woman.

I will add, though, to what Jolly Roger said -- clothing often have the effect of making a body look more attractive. Bras, for example, make a woman's boobs more pert and full, and add cleavage. As JR alluded to, knickers make the bum look more shapely, prevent sagging, etc. And that's just underwear -- jeans, skirts, sweaters, shirts/t-shirts, etc all add to the effect. Girls with sagging boobs or with a bit of a belly can get a real lift by wearing clothes that, first of all, fit them, and second by wearing clothes that keep everything looking in shape.
 
If it's solely about appearance, clothes frequently enhance it.

If it's solely about function, clothes generally impede.


Since this thread specifies looks, the former.
 
Back
Top Bottom