Obviously you've taken lack of privacy means total disregard of other human laws, like trespassing, B&E, lewd behaviour and so forth.
But you said "no privacy for anyone". That means that if I want to know about your sex life you have to let me watch. If I want to know where you keep all of your important documents, you have to tell me. If I want to make sure you aren't making biological weapons in your house then you have to let me search your house, whether or not I am a police officer. That is what "no privacy for anyone" means. It means you cannot hide anything from ANYONE. You must leave your entire life open and accessible to any individual or organization that wants to peek into your life. Now if that is not the kind of world you are advocating, then perhaps you should consider amending your "no privacy for anyone" statement.
Maybe I am a terrible person and you'd might be quite right to judge so, but I believe everyone's record should be matter of public information, this law makes it so that Google has to hide any deeds or misdeeds you don't want to make known. After all everyone loses their mind when a sex offender moves in your neighbourhood. Would you mind against living next to an ex-death squad member, a white supremacist, someone who plays with Ebola in their basement?[/QUOTE]
I am actually against the sex offender database. I think it is unjust persecution of convicts who have served their time. By putting them in a database that anyone can look up, thus opening them up to attacks (which has happened in the past), you are essentially punishing them for a crime that according to their prison term, they have already paid for. It especially bothers me because there are very minor offenses that get you put on the sex offender list. But this is a topic of its own that I will not discuss further in this thread.
As to your point: No I would not like living next to those type of people, but as long as they are not overtly hostile towards me or my family, then it is none of my damn business to go poking around their records. Not to mention the point you are raising is starting to cross into some very dangerous territory. The whole "don't you want to know who your neighbors are?" argument can very easily drift into the "let's start weeding out the undesirables" argument.
I think what you are failing to see is that the right to privacy really is the foundation for most of the civil liberties and rights we still have. Now you are saying you want to take that foundation. Well what do you think happens when you take that foundation away? Say good-bye to religious freedom, free speech, a free press, protection from unwarranted search and seizure, etc. It may seem crazy, but if you sit down and really think about it, you can tie the right to privacy to just about every single civil right we have.
I also have to ask this question since you brought up the whole knowing your neighbors thing: What makes you think you have the right to look up someone's records? What authority do you have that allows you to be privy to every detail of someone's life? I'll tell you: You have no right and you have no authority to access another private citizen's personal information. Stop being a busy-body and leave people alone unless they are a current, active threat to you or your family.
And the reason I say you are a terrible person over this is because you are too short-sighted to see how you would be violating someone's rights and making their life miserable, just so you can have peace-of-mind that your neighbor isn't an axe-murderer.
