Latvian citizenship laws

RedRalph

Deity
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
20,708
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8630304.stm

What is it like being a non-citizen in the country where you have lived all your life? That's the experience of many ethnic Russians in the Baltic state of Latvia.

In a classroom in the Latvian capital, Riga, 23-year-old student Dmitrijs Afanasjevs takes a seat nervously. He is one of a dozen people about to sit a Latvian language exam, as part of a test to become a Latvian citizen.

But Dmitrijs is not an immigrant. Like most of the people in this room, he was born in Latvia. In fact, even his parents were born here.

But his family is ethnically Russian. And because they moved here while Latvia was part of the USSR, he is not automatically eligible for Latvian nationality.

Instead he is classed as a so-called resident alien. Only those born after Latvian independence in 1991 automatically receive citizenship.

'Feel cheated'

The words in Latvian for "non-citizen" are printed in large bold letters on the cover of Dmitrijs' passport.

I need citizenship to be a human
Dmitrijs Afanasjevs, Student

This means he can't vote, can't work in many state-employed positions and often has trouble crossing borders.

"I can travel with my passport, but when I am in France in the airport, and I show my passport, they say, 'Sorry, which country are you from? What is this?' And I have to say I am not a citizen," he said before sitting the test. "I need citizenship to be a human."

In Latvia, a country of just over 2.2 million people, around a third of the population is defined as ethnically Russian - a category used to include Russian-speakers from all over the former Soviet Union.

More than 250,000 of these ethnic Russians are not Latvian citizens. But almost 90% of them do not have Russian citizenship either. They are in a limbo between states.

According to Riga's first ethnically Russian mayor, Nils Usakovs, older ethnic Russians feel particularly let down by the Latvian state.

"Some of them feel that they were cheated. They voted for Latvian independence in 1990 and they didn't get Latvian passports despite the fact they have lived here all their lives."

Scars of history

Latvia's ethnic mix is a legacy of almost half a century of Soviet rule, before the country achieved independence in 1991.
Latvian nationalists protest in front of parliament
Nationalist protesters decry Russian "colonialism" in Latvia

Until the 1980s, large numbers of Russian workers were sent to Latvia, ostensibly to provide manpower for Soviet factories.

But Latvian historians believe the Russian influx was a conscious decision by Moscow to dilute native Baltic culture.

Most settled in urban areas, and today in the capital, Riga, almost half of the population speaks Russian as a first language. In Latvia's second-largest city, Daugava, 75% of residents are ethnically Russian.

"You have more daily newspapers in Russian than in Latvian," says Roberts Zile, head of the Latvian nationalist For Fatherland and Freedom party, a partner in the country's governing coalition.

"Our language survived decades of Soviet oppression. That's why we are really worried now about the increase of Russian-language media in the public space here in Latvia."

Mr Zile has launched a campaign for a referendum to ban Russian-language state schools, which account for about 14% of Latvia's high schools.

But Russian-speakers say the ban would discriminate against their rights as an ethnic minority and Mr Zile's political opponents accuse him of pandering to nationalist voters ahead of October's general election.

'Back door colonialism'

In any event, Mr Zile is unlikely to garner the 10% of public support needed to launch a referendum.

On the steps of the national parliament in Riga, Latvian nationalists, some of whom belong to Mr Zile's party, are protesting against a new bill which they say is Russian colonialism by the back door.

The law would give wealthy foreigners residency rights in Latvia if they start a business or buy property. These protestors claim this would allow rich Russian oligarchs to take over Latvia. It is Russian imperialism all over again, they say, but this time with money instead of tanks.

Tensions are also likely to come to the surface on 9 May, when Russians from all over the country come to the Soviet Victory Monument in Riga to celebrate victory over Nazi Germany in World War II.

For Latvians, the riotous celebrations are hard to stomach. For them this date marks the beginning of half a century of Soviet occupation.

Considering Latvia's painful history, the two communities rub along remarkably well. There are no violent clashes and only a minority of extremists from either side express intolerant views.

But young people, like Dmitrijs, are still feeling the effects of the region's tortured history.

Back at the exam centre, he has just collected his results for his citizenship test.

"It's very funny... I didn't pass," he said. "They said my spoken Latvian was perfect, but I had some problems with writing."

Dmitrijs now has to wait until September until he can re-take the test. Until then he remains a non-citizen in the country where he was born.

What do ye make of this? Seems incredibly unfair to me, I'm surprised the EU doesn't have anything to say about it (that I know of)
 
All that "non-citizenship status" thingy just destabilizes the societies of Estonia and Latvia (Lithuania, bless her, had enough common sense non to do that balderdash with her ethnic minorities). Is there a legitimate reason for it, besides avenging the Soviet annexation (which is not a legitimate reason)? No.
 
Just to play Devil's advocate, do they typically view themselves as Latvian nationals, or Ruskies in Latvia?
 
Dr. Doom rules with an iron fist.
 
Just to play Devil's advocate, do they typically view themselves as Latvian nationals, or Ruskies in Latvia?

I daresay that the majority feels the latter - but I don't consider "how people view themselves" a legitimate reason for all that "non-citizen" nonsense, and, what's more, it's possible that their alienation from Latvian society is a result of such policies.
 
Disgusting. This should have been solved as a precondition to EU membership. EU preconditions are probably the EU's most powerful tool for doing good, and have already been used to achieve enormously positive outcomes. It's a shame we didn't dig in our heals over this crap when we had the chance.
 
Citizenship should be available to anyone who lives in a country for a few years. None of this bloodlines, ethnicity or language bollocks.
 
I welcome him to come to the United States.
 
It's funny, actually. When Mugabe terrorizes whites in his little hellhole, some of the lefties on this forum actually support it - the Africans have a right to take revenge on the descendants of their former white colonizers, obviously...

When the Latvians issue laws which are supposed to ensure that their tiny nations doesn't cease to exist altogether, people are suddenly up it arms about it.

Now, before people jump to conclusions as it is customary on this forum, let me say this: I support the right of Latvians to set reasonable rules that assure that

a) their Russian minority doesn't become majority
b) these Russians learn the language of the majority
c) they'll respect the fact that the country is independent and won't be joining Russia again.

It would of course be nice if these laws also strengthened some sort of common culture and national cohesiveness, therefore it is really counter-productive to just rub the Russians' noses in it.

Citizenship should be available to anyone who lives in a country for a few years. None of this bloodlines, ethnicity or language bollocks.

I've hardly heard anything more ridiculous on this forum.

Make them citizens and they'll be good Latvians in a generation.

Yeah, just look at Kosovo.
 
a) their Russian minority doesn't become majority
How'd you do that? Encourage Latvians and Estonians to breed, discourage Russians to do so?

b) these Russians learn the language of the majority
They're welcome to do so, however, it's a natural process which, if anything, is hampered by "non-citizen" broohaha.

c) they'll respect the fact that the country is independent and won't be joining Russia again.
Denial of citizenship only works to provide an additional motivation for a desire to join Russia.

So, how all that non-citizenship nonsense helps to achieve a), b) and c)?
 
Yeah, just look at Kosovo.

Except for two very big differences. Latvia has yet to attempt ethnic cleansing and the Russians are not primarily restricted to one or two provinces where they are the majority.
 
what international treaty would it violate?

Out of curiosity, does every other country grant citizenship automatically to those born there?

Certainly not. Actually most don't, though ~40 countries do (restrictions apply ;)).
 
Back
Top Bottom