Russia a democracy after all - sort of

Angry kids'll have an occupation for a weekend besides beer and serious-business talk at kitchen. They might even disrupt order and so the study day in Monday, what is highly desirable cause New Year's holidays are close :)
 
Angry kids'll have an occupation for a weekend besides beer and serious-business talk at kitchen. They might even disrupt order and so the study day in Monday, what is highly desirable cause New Year's holidays are close :)

Thats the spirit! Make a day out of it! Why don't you get a sixpack and join in? I would love to but would need some harder spirits since I imagine it is pretty cold... atleast over there by the pacific! :)
 
AND if you keep close to the demonstrators from FEMEM there is a bonus ;)
 
So far the rally for free elections is becoming quite what the organisers had hoped to be, 40.000 protesters. (Moscow police estimates are at 20.000).

Although the national television is saying it are only 7000, at least they're acknowledging that there are demonstrations, which is a big change since the rest of the week where the demonstration for freedom were completely ignored by the state TV.

It's probably the biggest demonstration since (the fall of the) Soviet-Union.
 
Even football fans made more than that...
When were football fans demonstrating? And for what? Free elections as well?
Mind you, I'm only repeating what I read in the news sources. And they haven't mentioned a football-demonstration.

But I must say that it's good that the people of Moscow, or at least a part of them dare taking the street. I hope it's going to have a positive effect by showing other Muscovites that they don't have to be scared to demonstrate and claim what's rightfully theirs.
 
showing other Muscovites that they don't have to be scared to demonstrate
facepalm.gif


Those who are there now were always there demonstrating (or in school). And what they are saying there... it is sooooo populist and stupid.
 
Of course it is! They're angry demonstrants with good reasons to be angry.
 
The current events have already exceeded my expectations. I don't expect anything to change in the short term though.
 
The current events have already exceeded my expectations. I don't expect anything to change in the short term though.

It still doesn't have the kind of public support to really reach the scale that could topple the regime. But at the very least it will teach the opposition a lesson in how to do this, and people won't be as afraid to come and protest the next time.

Too bad the elections were not held in summer, the cold weather must be counter-productive :)
 
My "grave allegation" and base for "conspiracy theory" is the statement that Western mass media favors pro-Western candidates more than pro-Russian. This cannot be true, right?
No it was not. Go back and read what you actually wrote. I wouldn't have as much of a quarrel with this statement.
Elections of 2004 in Ukraine, first and second tours.
It's hard to find articles by major news stations on the final election, where the "pro-West-guy" won.
But I found one, from the BBC.
International observers from the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) which is monitoring the elections say the re-run has been much fairer than the earlier rounds.

"The people of this great country made a great step forwards to free and fair elections by electing the next president of Ukraine," said the head of the OSCE monitoring mission, Bruce George.

Ukraine has been plunged into bitter political crisis over the elections.

The first election result gave Mr Yanukovych 49.46% and Mr Yushchenko 46.61%. But Western poll observers complained of serious irregularities and said the vote failed to meet international standards.
See? :p But were the "irregularities" of the final election less of the topic than the irregularities before? Of course they were. First the final result finally also matched what was predicted by representative polling. Secondly, change (more democracy) is most of the time more emphasized than things that stay the same (still democratic deficiencies). And thirdly, Western media surely has one major bias: Bias towards democratic movements in undemocratic countries. So it has a general tendency to make those look good. That may or may not be to your liking, but it is a long way from there to your allegation.
 
No it was not. Go back and read what you actually wrote. I wouldn't have as much of a quarrel with this statement.
I wrote that Western mass media will declare elections which were not won by pro-Western, "democratic" candidate, rigged. As they pretty much always do. You called this grave allegation and conspiracy theory. If you disagree, give example of elections with participation of democratic candidate, lost by him and not reported as rigged.

It's hard to find articles by major news stations on the final election, where the "pro-West-guy" won.
But I found one, from the BBC.
Did you read your quote?
First elections were won by Yanukovich and observers complained of "serious irregularities".
Re-run (where pro-Western Yuschenko won) "has been much fairer"
 
I wrote that Western mass media will declare elections which were not won by pro-Western, "democratic" candidate, rigged. As they pretty much always do. You called this grave allegation and conspiracy theory. If you disagree, give example of elections with participation of democratic candidate, lost by him and not reported as rigged.
I already did. The 2011 Ukraine election. Though I am not sure if there really was no fraud at all. Some kind of fraud may be always present in Ukraine. But it wasn't a big deal.
Another example: The guy in Afghanistan is Pro-West and there are many reports on election fraud there.
I guess you just confuse correlation with causation (made possible by an unhealthy dose of baseless assumptions and/or misinformation on your part): Democracy kind of correlates with being Pro-Western. Not ultimately of course. But there is a certain correlation, especially in Europe.
Did you read your quote?
First elections were won by Yanukovich and observers complained of "serious irregularities".
Re-run (where pro-Western Yuschenko won) "has been much fairer"
Well dude it was.

Now frankly, I am growing tired of this discussion. Unless you have an actually factually based example for your conspiracy theory (which would still not prove it, but would at least be a good first step), I am out.
 
I already did. The 2011 Ukraine election.
No, you didn't. Neither Yanukovich nor Timoshenko was pro-Western.

Well dude it was.
Now frankly, I am growing tired of this discussion. Unless you have an actually factually based example for your conspiracy theory (which would still not prove it, but would at least be a good first step), I am out.
I gave you example - elections of 2004 in Ukraine. You answered with citation which exactly proves my point. I don't know why, may be you mistook Yanukovich and Yuschenko, they have similar surnames when written in English.
 
I wrote that Western mass media will declare elections which were not won by pro-Western, "democratic" candidate, rigged.

But the Russian elections were rigged, from the start even. I don't mean the obvious kind of rigging ("our great leader won with 98.9% percent of all votes"), but generally a more "subtle" one. Many parties were not even allowed to stand in the elections, the Kremlin-controlled TV channels ignored the opposition altogether, and Gods only know what happens in the regions.

In short, even if the voting itself was relatively free of ballot rigging and other kinds of cheating, the systematic repression of the opposition creates a political environment in which free and fair elections are impossible to be held.

First elections were won by Yanukovich and observers complained of "serious irregularities".
Re-run (where pro-Western Yuschenko won) "has been much fairer"

And when Yanukovich won the latest election, the West recognized that, if grudgingly. So much for your conspiracy theories.
 
Many parties were not even allowed to stand in the elections
Do you REALLY want neo-Nazi and radical nationalists to have seat in the Russian parlament?

the systematic repression of the opposition creates a political environment in which free and fair elections are impossible to be held
That is one of your so loved conspiracy theories.
 
Back
Top Bottom