Russian Answer to EU- The Eurasian Union

I mean, who wouldn't want to restore Old Rus'? It was simply too awesome to be forgotten for good.
I doubt that even seeking out Scandinavian leadership and governance again can set things straight this time... :mischief:
 
The only criticism I have is that Russia/Belarus should just be focusing on joining the already existing EU.

I think it is better for them to expand the scope of Shanghai Cooperation Organization, as they are already members in it.

Economy-wise, it also seems to be a good idea. There is no need to have the same currency, a barrier free trade zone can achieve a lot by itself.
 
Yeah, I am wondering about Armenia, too. I assume Onedreamer got confused re the Karabakh war, which saw episodes of Armenian army killing unarmed people of Azerbaijan. By "Caucasian republics" he probably means Chechnya (and Russian North Caucasus in general), where there had indeed been violence against Russians.

Care to provide any sources? That is completely honest question, btw. Armenians and Russians are both Orthodox. I have never heard of any anti-Russian pogroms in Armenia and couldn't find any sources either.

Depends whether you call skinheads "common people".

I wasn't talking of any full fledged war but just street vendettas, quite similar to what happened in the former Yugoslavia and no, I don't have written sources. Anyways, Yeekim I'm surprised you consider religion a primary factor of discrimination of Russians in former communist republics. Are you by any chance denying this discrimination in most former sovietic republics by large chunks of the population and if you (hopefully) are not don't you think it is solely based on ethnicity, as a consequence of the Russian and sovietic imperialism, much like the one Winner shows while at the same time denying it? Well, discrimination leads to various levels of ferocity in the prosecution, I don't find it that hard to believe given the numerous examples in the history of mankind.

Depends whether you call skinheads "common people".

You know, skinheads are called such to distinguish them from common people...
 
That doesn't make sense. If a country has no good it can produce cheaper or at superior quality than everyone else, it'd be stupid to completely take down its trade barriers.

Part of the success of developing East Asian countries comes from maintaining a high level of protection while their economy was still "catching on".
 
Are you by any chance denying this discrimination in most former sovietic republics by large chunks of the population and if you (hopefully) are not don't you think it is solely based on ethnicity, as a consequence of the Russian and sovietic imperialism, much like the one Winner shows while at the same time denying it?
You are asking Estonian to recognize discrimination of the Russians in former Soviet republics. He already denied this many times, at least for Estonia.

Armenians and Russians are both Orthodox.
Armenians are not Orthodox, they have separate confession. Many of the Russians are not Orthodox either. Though I also didn't hear Armenia was especially bad in terms of xenophobia, among post-Soviet states.
 
You know, skinheads are called such to distinguish them from common people...

Not all skinheads are racists. There is an anti-racist skinhead movement, if it still exists. A bunch of people who showed up to punk shows where I live (when I was in highschool) would profess to be anti-racist skinheads.
 
But that means they are racist toward racist skinheads !
 
That doesn't make sense. If a country has no good it can produce cheaper or at superior quality than everyone else, it'd be stupid to completely take down its trade barriers.
If a Country A has no good that nobody from Countries B-Z want to buy, why would you then even need a trade barrier? Unless there was something of value in Country A, why would Countries B-Z accept Country A's useless money when selling Country A products?

Part of the success of developing East Asian countries comes from maintaining a high level of protection while their economy was still "catching on".
That's a fallacy known as the "infant industry" argument. Businesses are not people and do not "grow up" and governments can not make internationally successful businesses by bullying domestic consumers into buying products from lousy companies.
 
I wasn't talking of any full fledged war but just street vendettas, quite similar to what happened in the former Yugoslavia and no, I don't have written sources. Anyways, Yeekim I'm surprised you consider religion a primary factor of discrimination of Russians in former communist republics. Are you by any chance denying this discrimination in most former sovietic republics by large chunks of the population and if you (hopefully) are not don't you think it is solely based on ethnicity, as a consequence of the Russian and sovietic imperialism, much like the one Winner shows while at the same time denying it? Well, discrimination leads to various levels of ferocity in the prosecution, I don't find it that hard to believe given the numerous examples in the history of mankind.
1) I am pretty sure that "what happened in former Yugoslavia" can safely be described as a "full fledged war" rather than "street vendettas".
2) No, I don't consider religion a primary factor of discrimination. It is, however, of some importance in that particular region.
3) Sure, you can always find "discrimination" anywhere. That is, however, not usually understood to mean "killing someone just because of his ethnicity", which is usually descried as "genocide", especially when committed by "large chunks of population".
4) I was simply wondering why you chose Armenia for an example of especially poor treatment of Russians whereas it could rather serve as an example of the opposite kind. Now that I understand it was a random pick probably based on some hearsay you misrememered, we can forget about it and move on.
 
1) I am pretty sure that "what happened in former Yugoslavia" can safely be described as a "full fledged war" rather than "street vendettas".
2) No, I don't consider religion a primary factor of discrimination. It is, however, of some importance in that particular region.
3) Sure, you can always find "discrimination" anywhere. That is, however, not usually understood to mean "killing someone just because of his ethnicity", which is usually descried as "genocide", especially when committed by "large chunks of population".
4) I was simply wondering why you chose Armenia for an example of especially poor treatment of Russians whereas it could rather serve as an example of the opposite kind. Now that I understand it was a random pick probably based on some hearsay you misrememered, we can forget about it and move on.

1) In the former Yougoslavia there were people that, overnight (ie after the crumble of the union), literally went out of their door to shoot their neighbors. Yeah, there was a full fledged war but claiming that this war was rather than street vendettas is quite off from truth.
2) as you said they are all the same religion so where is the importance? What about the independentists, filo-russians in Abkhazia and the rest of Georgians? Same area, and again not a religious issue.
3) Stating the obvious here. But in fact I specified the region where this discrimination had the worse outcome. I then had the impression that most posters were trying to ignore the fact that Russians are discriminated just the same as they discriminate other ethnicities.
4) Read above. I didn't chose it as an example of discrimination, I clearly wrote that was the worse case to my knowledge.


Not all skinheads are racists. There is an anti-racist skinhead movement, if it still exists. A bunch of people who showed up to punk shows where I live (when I was in highschool) would profess to be anti-racist skinheads.

And why do you quote me? I only said they aren't common people, not that they are racists.
 
Armenia was definitely not "the worst case". I don't remember anyone here complaining about Armenian discrimination of Russians. The cases of post-Soviet anti-Russian policies in the Baltic countries, Chechnya and Turkmenistan, however, are mentioned in Russian media.
 
I'm all for Russia forming Eurasia. Then all that is left is Oceania and Eastasia.

:sarcasm:
 
Back
Top Bottom