Terxpahseyton
Nobody
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2006
- Messages
- 10,759
I think this whole service-sector-development is the entirely wrong road to take.
I think we as society should focus on the material and service conditions the average comfortable life actually needs (quality food, quality housing, furniture, electronics, health care, means of transportation, recreational gadgets [which overlaps with electronics, of course]) and focus on aligning those with a work life which is experienced as less of a burden (fewer hours / less stress).
Once the workforce accomplishes such an alignment and we still have too many people needing a job we could worry about the expansion of services.
All that this in principle would require would be the endorsement of a social consensus on how the economy should serve the people. Instead, people serve the economy and if you don't play the game, your nation gets cut off from international trade, most notably international raw materials trade.
It all has a sense of tragic comedy if you think about it. At least it does to me.
Already good ol' Ricardo worried that in the present way of doing things the automation of production would have you left with people which would need to do some kind of busy work. He imagined this as people being house keepers. Society changed and found other busy work, but in principle he was right on the money.
tl/dr: Socialism ftw! Though perhaps the democratic kind, this time (Marxism-Leninism and its shrouded ideas had its chance)
Also - It seems I actually am a Socialist. Who knew.
I think we as society should focus on the material and service conditions the average comfortable life actually needs (quality food, quality housing, furniture, electronics, health care, means of transportation, recreational gadgets [which overlaps with electronics, of course]) and focus on aligning those with a work life which is experienced as less of a burden (fewer hours / less stress).
Once the workforce accomplishes such an alignment and we still have too many people needing a job we could worry about the expansion of services.
All that this in principle would require would be the endorsement of a social consensus on how the economy should serve the people. Instead, people serve the economy and if you don't play the game, your nation gets cut off from international trade, most notably international raw materials trade.
It all has a sense of tragic comedy if you think about it. At least it does to me.
Already good ol' Ricardo worried that in the present way of doing things the automation of production would have you left with people which would need to do some kind of busy work. He imagined this as people being house keepers. Society changed and found other busy work, but in principle he was right on the money.
tl/dr: Socialism ftw! Though perhaps the democratic kind, this time (Marxism-Leninism and its shrouded ideas had its chance)
Also - It seems I actually am a Socialist. Who knew.