Broken_Erika
Play with me.
Aimed lower, (i.e. at the ground by her feet)If you saw her trying to break into a trailer, what would you do?
Aimed lower, (i.e. at the ground by her feet)If you saw her trying to break into a trailer, what would you do?
Most other countries aren't chock full of gun-crazed people either.Most other countries on the planet don't seem to have this problem. What's more is that their police forces are generally expected to, and tend to succeed at, apprehending suspects (even armed ones) without shooting them.
The "gun them down on the off chance they might actually be a risk" approach doesn't seem to be a winning one.
and let her break in?
Kid could have been lying on the floor
Which the police did not know, and had good reason to believe otherwise, because of her own claims.but she was unarmed despite making threats
she was shoot exiting the home
and let her break in?
Kid could have been lying on the floor
I find it interesting that you consider not shooting someone to death in order to stop them breaking into a residence to be unfathomably ludicrous (or at least seemingly so).
If you have a gun in your hand and are so "fearing for your life" because someone might have a gun somewhere on their person that the only path you can think of that will make you feel safe is firing wildly until they are dead then you need to get help, not a badge.
This is the thing that keeps getting me. People love their cops so much they don't even want them to be trained to be good at their jobs?
It's very hard to make the citizens right's argument in the face of the fact that we are at historically low crime rates. It turns out locking up a large fraction of your young male population is positively correlated with low crime rates. Correlation =/= causation and all that but once the argument gets to that level you've already lost it with the hordes that would mete out justice based on gut feelings.Remarkable, isn't it? In my hometown the badge lickers are currently celebrating a deputy who "feared for his life" at a routine traffic stop, justifying ordering a citizen out of their car at gunpoint for a body search. The citizen turned out to be a felon, had some dope in his pockets and a gun in the car so got arrested ("taken off the streets"). Any questioning of the "soooo, just because it turned out nominally 'good' this time we are going to overlook the problem of citizens being forced from their cars at gunpoint as a response to routine traffic violations?" type is, of course, being thoroughly shouted down.
I'm always reminded of Flying_Pig posting about when he was serving in Northern Ireland, how the last thing they would do is go for their gun because once guns got involved it rarely ended well for anyone.This is the thing that keeps getting me. People love their cops so much they don't even want them to be trained to be good at their jobs?
Has anybody determined if the kid is "white"?Sexual assault is NOT a proper response, even if she is a criminal.
I beg to disagree. I'm sure you realize your police forces are neither imported from abroad nor do they operate in a vacuum.Irrelevant to the discussion.
That's not what I was responding too. I was responding to Berserkers question about what I would do if I were the cop. That is irrelevantI beg to disagree. I'm sure you realize your police forces are neither imported from abroad nor do they operate in a vacuum.
Of course, they're also woefully untrained, afaik.