Don't text. Don't want to text.
Mine as well. My ex used to rage at me for not picking up my phone whenever she called. Constantly being on call means you're not free. I'm not an ER doctor. I think Arwon has a point about texts being lower maintenance, and not having to respond right away (or listen to a rambling voicemail) is nice. Still I prefer email (which is free) to texts (which cost me about a penny & a half each to read & write).Email is by far my preferred method of communication. Or face to face.
Still I prefer email (which is free) to texts (which cost me about a penny & a half each to read & write).
Ditto. I've never been able to see myself using those tiny keys on my phone to leave someone a message. Give me a full keyboard any day, which is a little awkward to carry around with you. Hell, I rarely even use my phone for that matter. Email is by far my preferred method of communication. Or face to face.
I have a Tracfone, I pay about $220 a year for 4,500 minutes. Each text I read or write is .3 minutes. Beats paying $30-$100 a month.Really? Wow. I just assumed texts were free everywhere.
I don't even own anything I can use for texting. If I knew how to text, which I don't.Don't text. Don't want to text.
No, they don't.Everyone has caller ID now...
E-mail is good. And I much prefer it to voice-mail, which I never, ever*, use. I suppose I might - if it was a dire emergency and I really had no choice.
*watch very carefully: this is one of the very few occasions that I will ever use the phrase "never, ever,".
No, they don't.
I wasn't aware people still used phones that didn't have caller id. It's not the 90's.Everyone should, and I'm going to continue to assume they do.
There's really no reason not to have caller id, a phone supporting it costs $10 and there's no savings to be had with phone plans that don't have the feature.
Most of what you have to say, even to your friends and family, doesn't need to be immediately imposed on them in real time and can comfortably be relegated to low mental bandwidth, low time pressure media such as SMS.
I think of it this way: calling somebody is a very large demand on their time and their mental bandwidth. You're expecting them to drop everything and devote all their attention to you. This is very rarely justified if you're just exchanging simple information or making plans or the like.
Edit: also pretty much everyone has endless free texts these days
wasn't aware people still used phones that didn't have caller id. It's not the 90's.
Everyone should, and I'm going to continue to assume they do.
And only because, before we even get to your footnote, you've qualified that "never, ever" to not quite mean "never, ever."
CFC:OT will just have to keep waiting for a matter about which you can unreservedly use an absolute. I, anyway, am always on the watch.
Then please enlighten me as to where I can buy such a thing. Even my current basic landline was over $10, and I really had to argue with the salesclerk at Walmart, because she kept insisting that phones like that didn't exist anymore and tried to sell me some gadget that cost over $100.Everyone should, and I'm going to continue to assume they do.
There's really no reason not to have caller id, a phone supporting it costs $10 and there's no savings to be had with phone plans that don't have the feature.
Then please enlighten me as to where I can buy such a thing. Even my current basic landline was over $10, and I really had to argue with the salesclerk at Walmart, because she kept insisting that phones like that didn't exist anymore and tried to sell me some gadget that cost over $100.
My last phone had just died (that I'd owned for about 10 years and had paid about $9 for at London Drugs), I was next to broke until my next cheque, and desperately needed a phone.
Dang me!
And there was I thinking I was being unusually forthright these days.