texting?

Don't text. Don't want to text.

Ditto. I've never been able to see myself using those tiny keys on my phone to leave someone a message. Give me a full keyboard any day, which is a little awkward to carry around with you. Hell, I rarely even use my phone for that matter. Email is by far my preferred method of communication. Or face to face.
 
Email is by far my preferred method of communication. Or face to face.
Mine as well. My ex used to rage at me for not picking up my phone whenever she called. Constantly being on call means you're not free. I'm not an ER doctor. I think Arwon has a point about texts being lower maintenance, and not having to respond right away (or listen to a rambling voicemail) is nice. Still I prefer email (which is free) to texts (which cost me about a penny & a half each to read & write).
 
Still I prefer email (which is free) to texts (which cost me about a penny & a half each to read & write).

Really? Wow. I just assumed texts were free everywhere.
 
Ditto. I've never been able to see myself using those tiny keys on my phone to leave someone a message. Give me a full keyboard any day, which is a little awkward to carry around with you. Hell, I rarely even use my phone for that matter. Email is by far my preferred method of communication. Or face to face.

There seems to be a distinct cutoff between people who text (a lot), and those who hardly ever do.

I have tried to text. But, goodness me, was I crap at it!

Phones are good, though. As it matters not a bit what you look like. But I can't say I use the thing that much.

E-mail is good. And I much prefer it to voice-mail, which I never, ever*, use. I suppose I might - if it was a dire emergency and I really had no choice.

*watch very carefully: this is one of the very few occasions that I will ever use the phrase "never, ever,".
 
I fall pretty well in line with my generation. I text FAR more than I talk on the phone. That being said, I don't text nearly as much as other people my age.
 
I love texting. I first realized how amazing it was when I had a conversation with someone while I was on the bus. I have no appetite for talking on the phone on the bus, so the texting was awesome.

And then, at work, we could coordinate while each in different location in a 15 story building. That was awesome.

Finally, I am WAY funnier over text, because I have more time to create a clever turn of phrase.
 
E-mail is good. And I much prefer it to voice-mail, which I never, ever*, use. I suppose I might - if it was a dire emergency and I really had no choice.

*watch very carefully: this is one of the very few occasions that I will ever use the phrase "never, ever,".

And only because, before we even get to your footnote, you've qualified that "never, ever" to not quite mean "never, ever."

CFC:OT will just have to keep waiting for a matter about which you can unreservedly use an absolute. I, anyway, am always on the watch.
 
Everyone should, and I'm going to continue to assume they do.

There's really no reason not to have caller id, a phone supporting it costs $10 and there's no savings to be had with phone plans that don't have the feature.
I wasn't aware people still used phones that didn't have caller id. It's not the 90's.
 
Most of what you have to say, even to your friends and family, doesn't need to be immediately imposed on them in real time and can comfortably be relegated to low mental bandwidth, low time pressure media such as SMS.

I think that's completely correct. Not universally, but it's common depending on just how often you meet people, how much you have to say, what sort of thing, etc. etc.

Where I think texting gets a bad rap is that some of what people have to say isn't even worth texting. But texting is seen as so little effort, at each end, they do it anyway. Worse, its so easy they put even less thought into what they're communicating. Rather than an excellent replacement for phone calls it becomes a poor replacement for conversation, or thinking.

This is, I imagine, essentially what my great-grand father may have said of the ball point pen. And he was right!

My point isn't so much that people are needlessly down on new technologies, or texting is in some unique way bad*. My point is a lot of people like to blather and/or be blathered at, texting is an example of how it's getting ever-easier, so humanity will fall to the knives of the Skaven rat-men.


*Well, actually, tiny keyboards and screens may discourage substance while doing little to discourage blather.
 
I think of it this way: calling somebody is a very large demand on their time and their mental bandwidth. You're expecting them to drop everything and devote all their attention to you. This is very rarely justified if you're just exchanging simple information or making plans or the like.

I was trying to figure out why almost everybody prefers texting to voice conversations, and then I read this. I have a friend I have not seen in five years, or interacted with in fifteen years, and he tries to call me once a week and leaves voice messages. Text, dude! Text! Just text!

Edit: also pretty much everyone has endless free texts these days

Uh, remind me upgrade to a smart phone and get unlimited text messaging. :lol:

wasn't aware people still used phones that didn't have caller id. It's not the 90's.

Everyone should, and I'm going to continue to assume they do.

Caller ID is up there with remote control as greatest inventions. Next thing we need is a robo-call screener that prevents unwanted phone calls from getting to us in the first place. :p
 
And only because, before we even get to your footnote, you've qualified that "never, ever" to not quite mean "never, ever."

CFC:OT will just have to keep waiting for a matter about which you can unreservedly use an absolute. I, anyway, am always on the watch.

Dang me!

And there was I thinking I was being unusually forthright these days.
 
Everyone should, and I'm going to continue to assume they do.

There's really no reason not to have caller id, a phone supporting it costs $10 and there's no savings to be had with phone plans that don't have the feature.
Then please enlighten me as to where I can buy such a thing. Even my current basic landline was over $10, and I really had to argue with the salesclerk at Walmart, because she kept insisting that phones like that didn't exist anymore and tried to sell me some gadget that cost over $100.

My last phone had just died (that I'd owned for about 10 years and had paid about $9 for at London Drugs), I was next to broke until my next cheque, and desperately needed a phone.
 
Then please enlighten me as to where I can buy such a thing. Even my current basic landline was over $10, and I really had to argue with the salesclerk at Walmart, because she kept insisting that phones like that didn't exist anymore and tried to sell me some gadget that cost over $100.

My last phone had just died (that I'd owned for about 10 years and had paid about $9 for at London Drugs), I was next to broke until my next cheque, and desperately needed a phone.

For corded landline phones:

http://www.amazon.ca/Uniden-1260BK-.../dp/B0028Q82S6/ref=sr_1_2/178-6936486-5691235
http://www.kijiji.ca/v-phone-tablet-other/red-deer/bell-office-desk-phone/582472096
 
Texting can add a playfulness to communication simply talking with each other lacks. That can be a lot of fun. I don't think it is responsible for any relevant decrease of social quality. I think there are just people who seek to express their alienation in a way that it has reassuring meaning. I also think though that texting can become an obsession. Just as facebook can be one. Or twitter.

Or Internet forums.
 
Texting is invaluable to me, and I have a hard time understanding those who don't do it.
 
Dang me!

And there was I thinking I was being unusually forthright these days.

Oh, you're nothing if not forthright. It's just that in being so, you're also at pains to make sure nothing important is leftback.
 
Back
Top Bottom