Which Films have you seen lately? 19 - Get Your Film's Name Outta Your Mouth

Status
Not open for further replies.
^Eraser just works. It has crazy action scenes, James Caan (GOAT), goes crazily (semiautomatic pistol v. airliner? You got it), Arnie back when he was at his best, Vanessa Williams, crazy US v. the world thing, and also it doesn't take itself particularly seriously. It's a film that lets you know it's meant to be fun.

In order to continue the '80s retro there was a full Lethal Weapon marathon again. As Ian Gillan once sang: Hooooow can I resiiiist? ;)
 
Was curious to see Lucy even though it got bad reviews.

Always curious about the popular conception of super intelligence (like this story for instance).

It was really bad. The special effects were cool but super intelligence = undefeatable magical powers & sociopathic personality was a bit boring w a unsatisfying ending.
 
Last night's double-feature: Venom (2018) and Reign of Fire (2002). Eh, they were good enough for drinking a beer and not thinking too hard on a Saturday night. Reign of Fire was better (and was technically a rewatch, as I'd seen when it came out, but I didn't remember it very well). It had some plot holes and leaps of logic that you just have to choose to go along with, but I liked the central characters and their conflict*. The main character in Venom didn't make any impression on me whatsoever. I knew Tom Hardy was in it, but was pleasantly surprised to see Michelle Williams, Jenny Slate, and Riz Ahmed. But, wow, way to make fine actors duller than rice cakes, guys (as ever, I don't know how to separate the script, from the direction, from the performances, so I wag my finger at everyone). I think only Slate got over the wall of 'ho-hum', for me. Christian Bale and Matthew McConaughy, otoh, knew it was no time for subtlety and just ran into it at full speed, growling (in Bale's case) and bellowing (McConaughey). Good for them. They were way more entertaining. Ahmed & Williams were, I'm guessing, laughing all the way to the bank. I could have turned in Ahmed's performance in this movie. He probably looks better in a suit than I do, I guess.

* If anyone here plays Dungeons & Dragons, in the last game I ran, I used Bale & McConaughey's characters in this movie to illustrate the difference between a Cleric and a Paladin to a new player.
 
Jurassic World Dominion (2022). Um... er... Everybody looked great. That was nice. And that one chase scene wasn't bad. Well, at least I didn't have to pay to see it.
 
MoonFall .... WTH did my eyes just see?!:crazyeye:
 
Dr strangelove free on YT rn, should I watch?
(It's Kubrick, so) you should definitely watch it, if you haven't already!

But I'd also recommend using the biggest/ widest screen you can run YT on. IIRC (It's Kubrick, so) there are a lot of long/wide shots, and a smartphone-size screen might not be big enough to make out what's happening / who's talking.
 

Eh, isn't Weird Al a bit too irrelevant to make a film about?
Why does he need to be relevant? I want the movie to be good and/or fun.

Anyway, for people my age, Weird Al, Dr. Demento & Madonna are more relevant than Elvis Presley and Marilyn Monroe (and I think the new Monroe movie is getting bad reviews, to boot).
 
Why does he need to be relevant? I want the movie to be good and/or fun.

Anyway, for people my age, Weird Al, Dr. Demento & Madonna are more relevant than Elvis Presley and Marilyn Monroe (and I think the new Monroe movie is getting bad reviews, to boot).
It's just that he hasn't been in pop culture for a while, afaik. And he never was that big either; making hit parodies is cool but not really original :D
 
It's just that he hasn't been in pop culture for a while, afaik. And he never was that big either; making hit parodies is cool but not really original :D
Well, Hollywood is reaching for anything, anything at all, even half-recognizable to anybody. Nobody I knew was clamoring for a new Quantum Leap, a new Munsters, or an Addams Family spinoff. There's a new adaptation of All Quiet on the Western Front coming. If I went over to the Whole Foods at lunchtime and polled people on Weird Al and Eric Maria Remarque, who do we think would get more responses? We've already had _two_ Charlie's Angels remakes, fercrissakes. I think I read that somebody is already working on another Battlestar Galactica reboot. :run:
 
Why does he need to be relevant? I want the movie to be good and/or fun.
And that trailer looks like both.

It's clearly not intended to be a 'serious' biopic like e.g. Bohemian Rhapsody was.
 
The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent - Kind of disappointing to be honest. It's got some classic Nic Cage over acting, only it's Nic Cage playing Nic Cage so it's meta. Other than that though it's just a mildly amusing generic action-comedy.

Nope - This is Jordan Peele's latest movie and there's a lot I liked about it. The horror/suspense sequences are very effective. It's a very pretty film. Even just "normal" shots like a guy looking out his window at night are visually interesting. The acting is good as are the characters. There's some social commentary in here as well but it's different and not as central to the movie as it is in Peele's other films. But there were also some details that left me very confused
Spoiler Such as... :
What was up with the lady with the deformed face at the Jupiter Ranch?
Why was the shoe standing up on it's toes in the flashback sequence with Gordo?
Why did the alien unfurl in the wispy shape at the end?
Why did the director guy run off at the end to get another shot when it seemed like they had a perfectly good one already?
 
Weird Al looks to be a great movie. I'll certainly watch it. He has been doing his brand of music for such a long time he deserves a movie. If he is not in the R&R Hall of Fame he deserves to be.
 
I think they should implement a RnR obscure off-meta dark backroom of fame for the artists like Weird Al Jankovic, Gunther, Sique Sique Sputnik & others like that.
 
Creature Triple Feature yesterday:

The Criterion Collection digital restoration of Godzilla (1954). I'd forgotten how different Mr. Thunder Lizard looked in the original. I think I prefer the later iterations, visually. The sound was pitch-perfect right from the beginning, though. That iconic bellow-shriek was there from the beginning and has never been improved upon. The acting is very 1950s, which is to say a bit wooden to these 21st-Century eyes, but as long as you know what you're getting into, it's not a big deal. (Speaking of the cast, though, it occurred to me that every single person working on this film had to have experienced WWII. I wondered if making this movie was therapeutic or re-traumatizing.) The B&W was alright. I'm not a big B&W fan, I usually feel like a B&W movie or photo is just flat, but it didn't irritate me here and it might have made some of the FX easier to pull off. Speaking of the FX, they were actually pretty remarkable, considering when and how it was made. The set design and miniatures work was outstanding. You still have the problem of fire and water looking too big, because fire and water do what they do and you can't make them smaller, but even those environmental effects were impressively handled. I'd also forgotten that Gojira was a creature out of Japanese folklore (in the movie, at any rate - I don't know about irl). The fishermen knew about the giant beast that comes out of the sea, well before anyone in the movie ever sees it; they know what it is just from hearing about the ships going missing, and seeing wreckage and survivors wash up on the beach.

Tremors (1990) is a classic of the "Improved B-movie" subgenre that had a moment in the '90s and early '00s. In fact, it kind of kicked it off that whole wave of them. I'm thinking of things like Eight-Legged Freaks, Lake Placid, Starship Troopers, Deep Blue Sea, and Slither, all of which came after Tremors. Some of the movies that came before it were "B-Movies, Taken Seriously", like Cronenberg's The Fly and Carpenter's The Thing. This isn't one of those. It definitely doesn't take itself too seriously. It's not quite a laugh-out-loud comedy, but it has a wink-and-nod sense of humor. (Now that I'm thinking of Carpenter, Big Trouble in Little China could perhaps have been the 'starting gun' for this spree of "Improved B-Movies.")

I think Alien 3 (1992) is better than its reputation would have you believe. Of course it followed two of the greatest sci-fi movies ever made, so it was never going to live up to its legacy. Still, I enjoyed it on its own merits. Probably the least-scary of the three, but it had some cool moments. The setting was good, and the third group of people exploited by The Company was a good choice (blue-collar workers in the first movie; soldiers in the second; prisoners in the third). I liked the subtle changes to the xenomorph, with the implication that the animal it gestates inside influences its form, and the adoption of Sam Raimi's POV "demon cam" as the creature dashes through the corridors. I'd forgotten how deep the cast was. Sigourney Weaver, of course, but also Charles Dance, Charles Dutton, Pete Postlethwaite. Sharp eyes might catch Holt McCallany and Phil Davis, mentioned in passing in yonder thread (Mindhunter and Whitechapel, respectively), but I'm not sure either of them got any lines here before they got taken out for lunch.
 
Mimic is another one I’d classify as an improved B movie. Pretty good one with Mira Sorvino and Jeremy Northram.

I thought Alien 3 entertaining as well except:
Spoiler :
they killed off Newt!!!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom