While We Wait: Writer's Block & Other Lame Excuses

Status
Not open for further replies.
I for one have no idea what Jehoshua is talking about. His claim that liberalism was a religion was such a rhethorical suicide I just automatically blanked the rest of his posts' contents.

Which simply shows you have poor appreciation for allegory.
 
This reminds me, when I read Descartes' Metaphysical Meditations, I was extremely amused by the fact which later my philosophy teacher confirmed, that his demonstration of the existence of God, which is that existence of God is self evident, necessary and inevitable since we exist, is only valid if you believe that there is a God in the first place.
 
If you guys want a discussion that isn't hampered by OT people (which everyone seems to hate for some reason) why don't you make a Social Group? Because I'm fairly sure Bird isn't going to tolerate it here much longer...

Also, I don't get what is so bad about nations being based on your philosophical/political opinions. I wouldn't want to do it all the time, but I have often made nations that parody certain political positions I disagree with, such as the Orwellian Australia that I use often in IOTs. And Dommy's nation in MADIOT, although I don't really agree with his position that much, was a hilarious piece of satire. I know IOTs aren't NESes, but I still don't understand.
 
I can't pretend to have read all of this, but I must say that I don't believe that Jehoshua understands what allegory is. It isn't simply saying that one thing is something that it isn't; that's called "not the truth". Allegory is an important literary construct, the sort of thing you get in The Faerie Queene, or something like that, where what you say is intentionally representative of something else, which one cannot maintain to be anything to do with calling liberalism a religion, which it is neither literally, allegorically, metaphorically, or in any other way.

I also think that Jehoshua's point would be better made in plain English without all the obfuscations. I mean, to be honest, "A metaphysical constant, a first principle rather. This being because if the universe spontaneously emerged into existence it would ultimately be entirely meaningless and utterly unintelligible (a mass of contingent and finite phenomena without a non-contingent first principle, effectively infinite regress, even if you add a multiverse to the mix)" is so obfuscated as to mean... well, much less than you would have expected given the number of characters in the sentence. What exactly do you mean by saying that god is a metaphysical constant rather than a physical one? and what is this meaning or intellegibility that our world has that a differently random one would not possess? Are you basically just restating the cosmological argument there?

As for Bird tolerating such a discussion or otherwise, I would say it was directly relevant to NESing and possibly quite necessary, seeing as it is potentially interesting background to how Jehoshua acts as the Pope in CI and the Grandpatriarch in N3S. (It's also quite polite, and, as BJ says, probably more interesting than such discussions in OT.) If he thinks it's a bad idea, fair enough, but no-one is obliged to agree; if he thinks it's against the rules, he will undoubtedly tell us positively to stop. :)
 
I for one have no idea what Jehoshua is talking about. His claim that liberalism was a religion was such a rhethorical suicide I just automatically blanked the rest of his posts' contents.

Huh. Was pretty much the opposite for me. That kind of thing is what made me decide to actually read and try to understand him.
 
Moderator Action: Maybe I wasn't forceful enough when I said that the aforementioned discussion should be moved to OT. I have deleted posts related to it and see that I have not finished the job.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889


Oh god oh god oh god oh god oh god oh god, no. Not emphatic enough. NO. Do not play countries to express real world political beliefs; there are so many things wrong with this that I don't know where to start.

I forgot to tell you that I am going to be changing Iolha into a unitary republic with freedom of religion, state capitalism and a professional standing army. :rolleyes:

@christos, no one understands your proposition that "democracy is a foreign concept [to 'non-westerners']" because it is historically untrue.

OMG. NNNNNNNNOPE. Nope nope nope nope. I agree with North King entirely and wholeheartedly.

No, it makes perfect sense. Having discussions solves nothing, ever. Much better to passive-aggressively make jabs at ideologies you disagree with in what Birdjaguar just told us is supposed to be a more relaxed environment.

If you guys want a discussion that isn't hampered by OT people (which everyone seems to hate for some reason) why don't you make a Social Group? Because I'm fairly sure Bird isn't going to tolerate it here much longer...

Also, I don't get what is so bad about nations being based on your philosophical/political opinions. I wouldn't want to do it all the time, but I have often made nations that parody certain political positions I disagree with, such as the Orwellian Australia that I use often in IOTs. And Dommy's nation in MADIOT, although I don't really agree with his position that much, was a hilarious piece of satire. I know IOTs aren't NESes, but I still don't understand.
That discussion is just fine for WWW.
 
@ Ninjacow

The difference is between making a nation with some of your ideas and beliefs, and making a nation solely to express your ideas and beliefs. Things can get nasty and personal AMAZINGLY quickly.
 
Care to cite examples or at least be more specific? It doesn't seem like a bad idea to me so long as you keep yourself to some basic standards of artistic integrity in the process.
 
There are a couple of reasons to avoid OT discussions in WWW. The first is that we already have a place for them: OT and its related forums. By bringing those kinds of topics into NESing, we will bring many of the OT moderation issues here as well. They can be passionate topics with strong willed posters. In addition once such discussions get established, we will see non NESers migrate over here to participate. When I established the first WWW thread it was to provide a casual, more chatty environment for folks to wait for updates and not a place for serious minded discussion. I see it as a NES community oriented #NES with rules and civility. Adding such discussions will carry us outside of our original scope.

Since we already have a forum for highly charged political, religious, and societal issues, I see no beneficial reason to bring those topics here.

What I would suggest is that when you play a game you bring your religious/political and cultural beliefs into the game and create nations that are strange and interesting. You can fight your ideological battles in a game rather than in a discussion that will most likely go nowhere.
#nes is a reasonable environment for such discussions.

Is Mibbit not working? cause I'm trying to get on #nes, and it keeps timing out before connecting.
Are you connecting to warrensofthought.com?
 
@ Ninjacow

The difference is between making a nation with some of your ideas and beliefs, and making a nation solely to express your ideas and beliefs. Things can get nasty and personal AMAZINGLY quickly.

Ah I get it now.
 
I would say it was directly relevant to NESing and possibly quite necessary, seeing as it is potentially interesting background to how Jehoshua acts as the Pope in CI and the Grandpatriarch in N3S.

Practically all I do with the Grandpatriarch is build religious infrastructure, and manage evangelisation campaigns. My relationship to the CI papacy has already been discussed in the Capto Iugulum background thread.

This should address NC's statement as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom