Why are we using food for fuel?

classical_hero

In whom I trust
Joined
Jan 30, 2003
Messages
33,262
Location
Perth,Western Australia
cornuse.jpg

http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/2012/sep/04/us-eu-biofuel-food-crisis-nestle?newsfeed=true
Nestlé, the world's largest food company, has added its weight to calls by the UN and development groups for the US and EU to change their biofuel targets because of looming food shortages and price rises.

"We say no food for fuel," said Paul Bulcke, chief executive of Nestlé, at the end of the World Water Week conference in Sweden. "Agricultural food-based biofuel is an aberration. We say that the EU and US should put money behind the right biofuels."

Under laws intended to reduce foreign oil imports, 40% of US maize (corn) harvest must be used to make biofuels, even though one of the deepest droughts in the past 100 years is expected to reduce crop yields significantly. In addition, EU countries are expected to move towards drawing 10-20% of their energy supply for transport from biofuels to reduce carbon emissions.

But Nestlé, which has 470 food factories around the world and 25% of the world's bottled water market, says clean economy and US energy independence should not be pursued at the expense of food supplies or massive price increases.

"[Using biofuels] was well-intentioned at the time, but when you have better information then you have to be coherent," said Bulcke. "You have to know when to say: 'Stop here'. Now we see, too, that the carbon [reduction] element of biofuels is not as clear as it was intended to be."

Bulcke said Nestlé had lobbied the US and EU governments to change their quotas. "We have said [it] to [the] US government, but politically it's hard. We are an important food company and, yes, we do have a voice. We try to be vocal with our convictions."

Food should never be used as fuel and it does not even seem to be all that effective as a fuel so why are we harming those who need to be feed the most?
 
There are considerations to why biofeuls are used... and the root of opposition to biofeuls. I myself however am concerned with food crops being used in fear of how the ecomonically unfortunate will suffer with the rise in the price of their bread. We should have in mind also the other areas of generating power such as tidel and geothermal. The many answers to the energy question must be considered.

Of course one of the biggest considerations will be relative to cars due to the possibilities of ethanol. I myself would like to see more electric and hydro cars but the resource management from ethanol in comparisent to oil must be considered when commencing the observation of the matter.
 
In Brazil (and some other tropical countries now) we use sugar cane to produce ethanol. It is usually used to produce sugar and the price of sugar actually high enough that sometimes the producers prefer to reduce the ethanol on the market to export sugar instead.
As we are producing record levels of both sugar, ethanol and food in general, we are still not talking about any food crisis here.
The new development is to use the bagasse of sugar cane to produce more energy. So you can produce the sugar and ethanol with the same plant.
 
Corn ethanol fuel isn't clean, isn't cheap, and its use destroys food. I'm quite against it.
 
I used to be on the fence about biofuels, but if Nestle is against it then it must be a good idea.
 
Never mind the food. Why are we using alcohol for fuel?
 
The CEO of Nestle seems like an unbiased source.

He has only the best for mankind in his mind, of course....

though for once, I don't disagree with him, biofuels really aren't the solution.
 
The other way around is sadly also a valid question. Shifting away from monocultures would be more productive and modern agriculture has an unsustainable reliance on fossil fuel chemicals.

This also is a good demonstration of the wastefulness of meat production. If a bunch of industrialized nations like the United States reduced consumption of meat more food would be more cheaply available for more people on world markets.

Unfortunately, market forces absolutely allow wealthier societies and their people to afford these things, and market based solutions can't really exist for these problems.
 
What else would you use food for if not fuel?
 
Simple answer is the government subsidies it.
 
In response to the OP: somewhere there's a lobby that wanted it. The US government belongs to the magnates.
 
Food should never be used as fuel and it does not even seem to be all that effective as a fuel so why are we harming those who need to be feed the most?

Do note that Nestle's convictions are all about their profits. Having said that, this biofuels quotas thing was another stupid idea where a lot of people made some money riding on environmental alarmism.

Worse, those making the money from it are now big corporations with a lot of lobbying power. In Europe and the USA "big oil" jumped in for the subsidies and now they're going to keep milking those for as long as they can. This will be hard to roll back.
 
We also use fuel for food. A day's worth of food requires about a liter of fossil fuels to generate. An alternative question is "why are we eating a non-renewable resource?"
 
The thing is, the corn that's being grown can hardly be called food. It is mostly fed to animals, used as ethanol, or turned into corn byproducts. If you went to the Midwest Corn Belt and sampled corn in a field, it wouldn't taste like food.

U.S. corn breakdown according to Wikipedia:

The breakdown of usage of the 12.1 billion bushel 2008 U.S. maize crop was as follows, according to the World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates Report by the USDA.[59]

5,250 million bu. - livestock feed
3,650 million bu. - ethanol production
1,850 million bu. - exports
943 million bu. - production of starch, corn oil, sweeteners (HFCS, etc.)
327 million bu. - human consumption - grits, corn flour, corn meal, beverage alcohol

I don't at all agree with the industrial US food system. I would recommend Michael Pollan's book The Omnivore's Dilemma or the movie King Corn if you're interested in the subject.
 
Back
Top Bottom