Windows 8

Because it's not a downgrade and there's nothing I do that Win8 does worse than Win7.

How many more times are you going to have to say this do you think?
 
Windows 8 seems slightly faster and perhaps more stable (not 100% sure, as 7 wasn't THAT bad)
It's going to get new technology that won't make it into 7 (e.g. DirectX upgrades)
It's more touchscreen friendly
It's more keyboard friendly (search-based launching/administration has become much better)
It has a whole different ecosystem available (not much of a draw yet but maybe eventually)

However:
Tacky commercialism in spades.
The service integration they're pushing is heavily region locked.
Some interface changes feel clumsy if you want to spend all time in a traditional WIMP desktop.
Desktop is declared legacy, they want people to rely on their own store which gives them more control and a cut.

Most of the downsides I can see are a matter of taste and politics, while the advantages are quite tangible.
 
So I broke down and added one of those start menu 3rd party add-ons to Windows 8. I now have my start button and menu back and all is well. :) You can make it look like Classic (9x), XP, or Windows 7.

http://classicshell.sourceforge.net/

(cue zelig counter in 3...2...1... which I will pre-counter now just by saying that not everyone uses their computer the same way, and I really do better with a start button.)
 
I tried out Windows 8 on Tuesday, and it's not as bad as I feared. However, going from Metro to the desktop seems pointless if I already click on all my icons on the desktop. Until I actually tested it, though, I thought the desktop had been removed. Some interface things seem confusing, like basic navigation, but that would probably just take some getting used to. The Blue Screen of Death seems a lot nicer, but like it's being explained to an eight-year-old.
Spoiler :
BSoD_in_Windows_8.png
 
I love that "my PC" ran into a problem. Rather than something it's running.
This will probably pop up on many things that aren't a PC, and seem to address whoever happens to look at it.
 
Desktop is declared legacy, they want people to rely on their own store which gives them more control and a cut.

Admittedly that removes much incentive for me to own a Windows OS, I might as well get a Mac if I wanted to be forced to use their "store".
 
Admittedly that removes much incentive for me to own a Windows OS, I might as well get a Mac if I wanted to be forced to use their "store".

The Linux and BSD systems are the only free general purpose operating systems. Windows and Mac OS were "kind of free" from the end-user perspective in that the user was treated as an owner of the device. They're now being walled in.

Dump Microsoft. Dump Apple. Use a free system.
 
The Linux and BSD systems are the only free general purpose operating systems. Windows and Mac OS were "kind of free" from the end-user perspective in that the user was treated as an owner of the device. They're now being walled in.

Dump Microsoft. Dump Apple. Use a free system.

Linux desktop is ugly and can't run MS Office.
 
1) Which easily changeable default look of which of the 200 or so widely available desktops is ugly?
2) Hardly surprising given how MS Office is a study in lock-in. Enough reason to avoid it if at all possible and to send people insisting on the genuine thing files created with DOS-era versions.
 
Yes, Linux desktop is easily changeable. For example (kubuntu), you can remove the task bar in two clicks, I did that recently.

Getting it back however... The best recommendation I could find on the internet was to remove all of my personal Kubuntu settings, so that everything would get back to the default.

Genius design.
 
You mean nobody recommended you install Debian?

Sent from a phone, apols for any mistakes.
 
Back
Top Bottom