Narz
keeping it real
Why would my rent go up by $1,000 if Yang wins??I too favor giving an extra $1000 per tenant to landlords every month
Why would my rent go up by $1,000 if Yang wins??I too favor giving an extra $1000 per tenant to landlords every month
Why would my rent go up by $1,000 if Yang wins??
There is plenty of housing spread across the country. The UBI would help people better "bloom where they're planted" and revitalize rural areas & cities like Detroit rather than further crowded into overpriced metro areas where more opportunity is.Helping tenants afford rent raises rent cost In the short term but also helps decrease shortages (if zoning isn’t the limiting factor) as it encourages development. Rent control freezes rent for existing renters but raises rent much higher for new renters and decreases supply (worsening shortages).

Yang is definitely the best candidate to beat Trump. In the admittedly very, very slim chance he wins the primary there are likely very few Democrats who wouldn't vote for him (like Bernie, he's had a career of helping people, albeit in the private sectcion), he's squeaky clean, well spoken & poised, going to decriminalize marijuana, not much to dislike. And he doesn't have the baggage Bernie will (unfairly - age & the boogey-man socialism mostly) or Biden (he's an arrogant prick and also old/senile) or Warren (being flip-floppy, late to the party on progressive policies, claiming to be Native American). And, perhaps most importantly, he is likely to get far more converts from the Republican party than any other Democrat which is important to win swing states. And he's not shrill or reactive or focused on attack rather than policy, Trump would have a hard time getting at him in a debate.
Yang would need to pair up with a woman.Yang is definitely the best candidate to beat Trump. In the admittedly very, very slim chance he wins the primary there are likely very few Democrats who wouldn't vote for him (like Bernie, he's had a career of helping people, albeit in the private sectcion), he's squeaky clean, well spoken & poised, going to decriminalize marijuana, not much to dislike. And he doesn't have the baggage Bernie will (unfairly - age & the boogey-man socialism mostly) or Biden (he's an arrogant prick and also old/senile) or Warren (being flip-floppy, late to the party on progressive policies, claiming to be Native American). And, perhaps most importantly, he is likely to get far more converts from the Republican party than any other Democrat which is important to win swing states. And he's not shrill or reactive or focused on attack rather than policy, Trump would have a hard time getting at him in a debate.
Yang would need to pair up with a woman.
The best chance to beat Trump isn't the only criteria though. Since there's a high chance anything could beat Trump, it's a good opportunity to nominate someone from farther left. That's what make this primary so interesting: how far left will they go?
If Sanders wins, his Vice-President choice will be very important though, since that person will probably be the front runner in 4 to 8 years. And I guess it could be literally anybody (or I just can't tell).
Yeah when I found out she'd resigned my reaction was... "What?! Why?!? Because affair/sex scandal?? So effing what???"
I don't get it. Since when is a bog-standard sex scandal alone enough to get a politician to resign? Aren't we way past that naïve brand of Puritanical idealization in politics at this point? And if not, why not?
Hm, I didn't know at all about her. But when even just googling her name brings you said nude pics, I doubt she was viable any longer as a politician.
Which is bad, obviously, but to be expected.
But sleeping with staffers is a big labor abuse.
I have a lot of young, left-leaning friends that are all anti-socialist. It's not just a generational thing. Young people are more open to it but not allof them.This obsession you have with "socialism" as a liability for Sanders just doesn't compute for me. I suspect it's a generational thing.
Katie Hill.
Yeah when I found out she'd resigned my reaction was... "What?! Why?!? Because affair/sex scandal?? So effing what???"
I don't get it. Since when is a bog-standard sex scandal alone enough to get a politician to resign? Aren't we way past that naïve brand of Puritanical idealization in politics at this point? And if not, why not?
She's denied having an affair with a staffer and should have been given the benefit of the doubt and allowed to have an investigation to clear or prove the allegations. It's not right that we keep railroading people out of office because GOP shills levy accusations, meanwhile the GOP stands by child molesters and 'legitimate rape' scumbags. That said, I can understand why she'd want out of the personal quagmire as quickly as possible.Quick googling she was having affairs nude photos with another women and she had multiple erm affairs.
She was openly bisexual without the photos she could probably ride it out.
https://time.com/5712395/katie-hill-resigns-nude-photos/
I had to Google it. She also violated some rules as her last friend was a junior staffer.
I have a lot of young, left-leaning friends that are all anti-socialist. It's not just a generational thing. Young people are more open to it but not allof them.
She's denied having an affair with a staffer
Katie Hill admits to relationship with campaign staffer after ethics probe announced over separate alleged relationship