You're really out to prove that the Greeks invented sarcasm, I see.
Indeed the government didn't. And they didn't - maybe because they were incompetent - but definitely because they were populist to the core and giving up the euro was definitely not the popular choice.The government didn't. The greeks were only asked one thing: accept or refuse the terms pushed on Greece after its government had completely screwed up Greece's position in negotiations. Even so, even then, a majority of the voters refused it. The government then betrayed them and capitulated.
Your narrative is simply false unless by "they" you mean "the government, against the majority of the people's will".
https://web.archive.org/web/2015070...lead-syriza-public-issue-poll-support-euro-71Public opinion on the European Union was split, with 50 pct having a negative opinion and 48 pct having a positive opinion and 2 pct expressing no opinion. Support for remaining in the euro in the case of a referendum continued to be strong at 71 pct, with 25 pct against and 4 pct expressing no opinion.
Support for a return to the drachma, by contrast, stood at 19 pct, whereas 68 pct considered that a return to the drachma will probably make things worse, 10 pct considered that it would make no difference and 3 pct had no opinion.
Greece could have defaulted. Perhaps it should have - I don't know that. They didn't dare to bite that bullet. They didn't even dare to seriously prepare for that option, which is the only reason ECB had the amount of leverage they had. If they had had balls to default, neither EU nor ECB could have stopped them. (Whether they would be better off today, or in 10 years, I don't know).@Yeekim, what are interest rates? Are they humanitarian aid? Or are they part of a business deal?
Greek debt paid huge interest rates. That meant risk. Investors who bought that debt knew fully well the risk they were getting into, and were motivated by greed, not by any humanitarian intentions. Defaulting on debt that no longer can be paid under normal conditions is part of what was supposed to be the normal process of capitalism. Part of the rules agreed to by everyone involved.
The greeks did not actually need further loans, they just needed to get rid of interest payments. As it happened they were forced to keep serving debt, thus reducing even further their available funds. Forced not under the rules that all parties had agreed upon regarding debt, but under new rules made up after the crisis blew, with the sole purpose of saving the foreign creditors of Greece. This was debt bondage in the 21sst century, enforced by the institutions of the EU, chiefly the ECB.
Indeed the government didn't. And they didn't - maybe because they were incompetent - but definitely because they were populist to the core and giving up the euro was definitely not the popular choice.
The much-delayed vote will be on 15th January and will not be called off this time (according to 'sources'). A junior Brexit minister says that he thinks it will succeed this time. How is anyone's guess if people's minds haven't changed in the last month.
Any brexit news? Or at least news about the new ferry?![]()
No-deal Brexit rehearsal in Kent 'a waste of time'
Only 87 trucks take part in trial of emergency traffic system designed to cope with 6,000 vehicles
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...it-rehearsal-tests-traffic-congestion-in-kent
“It’s a waste of time. They should have done it in rush-hour. You can see the traffic here is just average. This is not what it will be like in no-deal,” said Adam Carter, a driver with IntLogistics.
Labour collaborators, perhaps?Hm, assuming that virtually no one will vote for it from the parties not in the gov, how is it at all likely for it to pass? Even a couple of torries not voting for it would make a majority impossible, no?
Wouldnt that at least require concessions? Afaik full exit from the common market is the main tory red line.Labour collaborators, perhaps?
Labour, the SNP, Green and Plaid Cymru are unlikely to vote for it, so unless the Tories vote for it en masse, the deal is dead (something we already knew back in November).
While a second ref sort of makes sense, it also doesnt, due to it no longer being about remain/leave. But a rejoin/stay out ref would also be farcical so soon after the first ref.Corbyn is still sitting on his fence, but a poll today apparently reported that 72% of Labour voters wanted some sort of 'final say' i.e. a second referendum, and a massive 88% of them would now vote remain if they got the option, so maybe his fence-sitting days will come to an end.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...vote-final-say-jeremy-corbyn-eu-a8706586.html
Soon there will have to be the vote: This deal or a no-deal Brexit. How are Labour, the SNP, Green and Plaid Cymru going to justify voting for a no-deal Brexit?
Corbyn is still sitting on his fence, but a poll today apparently reported that 72% of Labour voters wanted some sort of 'final say' i.e. a second referendum, and a massive 88% of them would now vote remain if they got the option, so maybe his fence-sitting days will come to an end.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...vote-final-say-jeremy-corbyn-eu-a8706586.html
And -apparently- a second ref with remain as an option would also require the eu to postpone its own euro elections (where atm therewould be no british candidates).