Cops want to force Boy to have an erection - for evidence

The policy of brutally prosecuting these statutory rape cases/child porn cases when both participants are willing peers is laughable. I wonder how many lives will be ruined before it finally changes.
 
Good to see ya back to your southern roots virginia

Edit:mm actually, the true south wouldnt care (so long as they are married)
 
I also find it ironic that they allegedly have these laws because of the bad "consequences" these actions can have on the children's lives when in reality the only horrific consequence to be found is the law that supposedly exists because of the terrible consequences.:crazyeye:
 
I can just imagine how the next generation of mugshots is going to look like ...
I'd shop a picture, but it would be nsfw.
 
If you think about it, it is also pretty amusing that there is a sex offender list but not say, uhm, a murderer list.

That and it appears to be a sex offenders list for mainly men. Why isn't the girl being added to it? If he's a sex offender, so is she.
 
This is completely stupid and I think in the future people will have a hard time understanding the kind of hysteria that would lead to the police arresting teenagers over possessing nude photos of themselves.

I agree. In some cases if the parents of one teenager hates the other (usually a guy, from what I've heard), it's pretty easy to screw over that poor guy's life - no matter how decent he is - by turning him into, legally speaking, a registered sex offender (or something like that). For, say, a fifteen year old boy, that can be a terrible ordeal to live through.

I do wonder why the girl isn't also in trouble over this?

It's a double standard unfortunately. Some people think women can't be pedophiles or rapists and such, and in some places in America this sort of attitude influences legislation (I've heard in some places, for instance, if a man calls the police because his wife is physically abusing him, the police will automatically arrest him).
 
We should be able to add authorities who waste our collective time and resources with stuff like this to the witch hunt list.
 
That and it appears to be a sex offenders list for mainly men. Why isn't the girl being added to it? If he's a sex offender, so is she.

There are women on the list but I think there probably is a double standard where in a consensual case like this people will just blame the boy.

I agree. In some cases if the parents of one teenager hates the other (usually a guy, from what I've heard), it's pretty easy to screw over that poor guy's life - no matter how decent he is - by turning him into, legally speaking, a registered sex offender (or something like that). For, say, a fifteen year old boy, that can be a terrible ordeal to live through.



It's a double standard unfortunately. Some people think women can't be pedophiles or rapists and such, and in some places in America this sort of attitude influences legislation (I've heard in some places, for instance, if a man calls the police because his wife is physically abusing him, the police will automatically arrest him).

I read another article that said the girls mother brought the complaint to the police. The girl allegedly sent explicit photos of herself but she hasn't been charged.

Actually I don't believe the girl should be charged because I believe neither of them should but its sexist that only he is being charged.
 
(I've heard in some places, for instance, if a man calls the police because his wife is physically abusing him, the police will automatically arrest him).

Men are discriminated against in these type of circumstances in the U.S., but I doubt the above is true.
 
I read another article that said the girls mother brought the complaint to the police. The girl allegedly sent explicit photos of herself but she hasn't been charged.

Makes sense. I get the feeling a lot of these underage sex offenders (who oftentimes aren't doing anything remotely horrific) are being turned in by over-zealous parents who don't realize, or don't want to believe, that their daughter is just as immature and clueless as that evil evil boy who hurt their precious girl. Sort of like that other story from a while back where a man shot his daughter's boyfriend when he snuck into their house or something. In many of these cases, the boy is always assumed to be in the wrong unfortunately.

Guess overprotective parents can be the same all over. My grandfather told me of how he ran for his life one time when he was a wee lad and tried sneaking into a girl's house, only to be discovered by her dad.



Men are discriminated against in these type of circumstances in the U.S., but I doubt the above is true.

I forgot where I read something like that, and Id pull it up if I remembered. Hopefully it is incorrect, though yeah doesn't matter much as men can be discriminated against in such circumstances.
 
It is just that at least I would expect modern parents to be more mature than that. It really does not enter my brain how they can be so zealous in this day and age. Only explanation which comes to my mind it mindless Jesus zombie.
"Must - eat brains - protect - daughter - from - the devil. uhahuarghh..."

Or as you seem to suggest a person who is basically a child. Wholly ignorant of the consequences of their actions and uncompromisingly going by their gut
"My precious little princess!"
 
ballbreaker.jpg


^ Very first thing that popped into my mind upon reading the OP. I cannot believe this is even being considered.
 
It is just that at least I would expect modern parents to be more mature than that. It really does not enter my brain how they can be so zealous in this day and age. Only explanation which comes to my mind it mindless Jesus zombie.
"Must - eat brains - protect - daughter - from - the devil. uhahuarghh..."

Or as you seem to suggest a person who is basically a child. Wholly ignorant of the consequences of their actions and uncompromisingly going by their gut
"My precious little princess!"

Pretty much I'd say, and it's a manifestation of some long-standing stereotypes about both boys and girls - that guys are heartless horndogs who want to hump any and every girl in sight, and that girls are virtuous pure virgins who are purer than... purity or something. So obviously parents (and older siblings, if they're unreasonable) have to protect their precious little princesses from those evil filthy barbarian hordes of rampaging bags of testosterone.

Although occasionally I'll see parents - usually mothers - being overprotective of boys as well, telling them things like how women are evil seductresses who will steal your soul/lure you into slavery a bad relationship/are whores who want to ruin you/etc. My mother used to tell me things like that, though now I realize she was just trolling me.

Of course, usually parents of boys don't bring up charges against girls though. And if they did I don't think many people would take them seriously, even if the charges are legitimate.

hey this happened only a stone's throw from my parent's house

good thing madviking never sexted as an underaged youth

So... you do sexting after you became a legal adult? :mischief:
 
So the warrant was issued, but the cops have refused to act on it.

Why does this generation hate their younger generation so much, that it spends so much time, effort and money to make their life miserable?

Because the younger generation are emailing pictures of their dicks to each other.
 
Back
Top Bottom