Makes sense. Not a very good metric, though.edit: @leoreth: the score appears to be "# of green boxes - # of red boxes"
And a guy making faces with a glass while another guy sings a song about a monster from the swamps that gets killed with a crop duster and sold to a zoo is quite confusing too. The internet is that weird.
That's what the author is very much aware of, and the main point is the gap in general "easy-to-use"-ness to conventional fossile energy sources:Too bad that the criteria are of wildly unequal importance.
Tom Murphy said:The scoring scheme should not be taken too seriously. Abundance is more important than whether something is backyard-compatible, for instance. Yet devising a weighting scheme struck me as adding unwarranted complexity and perhaps even increasing the subjectivity of the exercise. If you are so motivated, generate your own weighting scheme and change box colors while you're at it. Post it on a blog! Treat us to your biases.
Rather than fostering infighting among renewables, I hope the main points are not lost: that fossil fuels are qualitatively superior on the matrix categories, and that transportation without fossil fuels will be hard. The world is not static, and neither is the matrix. Reds can become yellow and green, with development. Greens could become yellow with depletion, etc.
I am seriously disappointed in the South. I thought they all lazed around in clubs at night sipping bourbon and listenign to southern gee-tar.
Too bad that the criteria are of wildly unequal importance.
That's what I like about Swedish-Americans, they're subtle about keeping their traditions alive. The Irish and Italians need to throw big parades, make a lot of noise, but the Swedes will just sit quitely out in South Minnebraska getting slowly but surely stocious for three months straight just like their ancestors have done for thousands of years.Lots of teetotalers in the South. There ain't nothing to do in the great plains/upper midwest besides get hammered. Plus, it helps you stay warm in teh winter.
its logical conclusion, which would be year/month/day/hour/minute/second. Right now it would be 2012-02-07-16-40-27. Look how neat that is!![]()
year-month-day-(etc) makes a lot of sense in the computer age, because when you sort things alphabetically they are also sorted by date.
I am seriously disappointed in the South. I thought they all lazed around in clubs at night sipping bourbon and listenign to southern gee-tar.
Nope. For Wisconsin, they lack the Protestant Work Ethic found by Good Upstanding Swedes in Minnesota, and instead decide it is too cold to be sober.I am seriously disappointed in the South. I thought they all lazed around in clubs at night sipping bourbon and listenign to southern gee-tar.
P. Krugman said:Aaron Carroll of The Incidental Economist and I have been emailing back and forth about the extent to which conservative states tend to be much more dependent on government support than liberal states, and Aaron has produced a nice chart. He takes the top ten most conservative and liberal states as ranked by Gallup, plots the conservative minus liberal score on the X-axis, and the ratio of transfers to personal income on the Y-axis: