Fall From Heaven NES

[Tyrs]

Nothing past a "We'll call you" from the Summer Court? That's a little disappointing
EDIT: While we're talking about trade, do I really only have ONE need? I'm not sure if that's a good thing or not...

 

[Ekolite]

Calabim trade routes are *provisionally* Lanun & Svartalfar.

 

[merciary]

Wow Jopa way to throw all previous agreements out the window. Unless I can come up with something better or get a better offer:
One route to the Amurites and another to the Balseraphs.

And I do love how no one needs the goods I produce.

 

[TheJopa]

And yes, it is intentional that you must pick your partners well

 

[TheJopa]

Nothing past a "We'll call you" from the Summer Court? That's a little disappointing

Do you have MSN?

 

[TheJopa]

Wow Jopa way to throw all previous agreements out the window. Unless I can come up with something better or get a better offer:
One route to the Amurites and another to the Balseraphs.

And I do love how no one needs the goods I produce.

Hey, you could propose some goods to produce.

NPC trade deal still stands, in fact its stronger.

 

[TheJopa]

Well, in fact, let us vote for or against the new system. I realized that some players are under trade agreements and I'd hate to break em.

If refused, then it still stays as it was last turn. I will consider approving few new trade routes.

 

[merciary]

Wait which NPC are you talking about? Or both?

Edit: oh that little grip was mainly directed at myself for picking a horrible position resource wise.

Edit edit: well I guess I'm for it since it's more in my benefit

 

[Ekolite]

I vote No for the halving of trade routes, but I do think the Calabim deserve their fourth route (finally!!).

 

[Tyrs]

Vote No. The more trade routes means more trade deals that can be made.
EDIT: TheJope: Yes, I do have MSN, same as my email.

 

[LDiCesare]

I think it's a bad idea to reduce the total number of trade routes too. It would just lower diplomacy; even though that would probably not affect me much anyway, since I'm not receiving as many as I send.
Also, I sent you some (provisional) final orders with one question at the end. Did you recieve it? I sent it before your post syaing you had received none...

 

[TheJopa]

I think it's a bad idea to reduce the total number of trade routes too. It would just lower diplomacy; even though that would probably not affect me much anyway, since I'm not receiving as many as I send.
Also, I sent you some (provisional) final orders with one question at the end. Did you recieve it? I sent it before your post syaing you had received none...

Ah, yes, it is all fine.


So I'm not introducing the new trade. I in fact like the way trade plays. I'm just torn between 'allow more trade routes' and 'increase each trade route gain'

 

[Algeroth]

Guys, sorry for the waiting, I know it's bad time for me having the most exhausting pre-exam part of the semester, but this is how it is. Have a little patience please.

Also: No on the halving of traderoutes.

 

[loki1232]

No.

Also, I'd like to support the Summer Court. As the Calabim are openly supporting their oppressors, there is no reason for me to stand back. Who should I contact about that?

 

[Tyrs]

Peace talks are in progress, military support is no longer necessary. I'll take your support into consideration during negotiations if that makes you feel better.

 

[TheJopa]

Guys, sorry for the waiting, I know it's bad time for me having the most exhausting pre-exam part of the semester, but this is how it is. Have a little patience please.

Also: No on the halving of traderoutes.

No stress, I know how it feels, same here

 

[TheJopa]

No.

Also, I'd like to support the Summer Court. As the Calabim are openly supporting their oppressors, there is no reason for me to stand back. Who should I contact about that?

PM or mail me.

 

[orangelex44]

Oh, wow - no love for Jopa on this, is there?

I am actually FOR the proposal. Players should have to make tough decisions about who to send trade routes to. Four trade routes is one too many IMHO.

 

[TheJopa]

Oh, wow - no love for Jopa on this, is there?

I am actually FOR the proposal. Players should have to make tough decisions about who to send trade routes to. Four trade routes is one too many IMHO.

That was along my lines, that and fact that it's easy to mess up with many trade routes. As long as there is patience to fix mistakes, no problem as far as I'm concerned.

 

[orangelex44]

So you're going with the popular vote, then? Four trade routes, instead of two?

If that's the case, my fourth route goes to the Hippus.