Ferguson

okay, I may be wrong about the head shot, but knocking someone backwards with a pistol still seems a myth, and mythbusters did a couple episodes on it.

And:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDRRJZ6rJBY&feature=related

You would think even if the armor stopped the bullet from penetrating, it wouldn't absorb the force of knocking him over.

You can see the guy in the video stiffen up and set himself cause he knows precisely when it's coming. Even then it pushes him back a bit.

If he were relaxed and not knowing its coming, the effect would probably be even greater.
 
Not exactly. The bullet has as much kick arriving as the recoil on the firearm. If you are not braced for it, it could knock you over. Long guns have higher velocity and heavier bullets. They can easily knock someone down.

I've never felt any recoil that would even come close to knocking me down. At the very most I might lose my balance if I was standing awkwardly.

Any recoiling firearm powerful enough to knock a person off their feet would be far too unsafe to be shoulder fired. You'd be facing at possible detached retinas and broken bones if you shot a gun like that.
 
I've never felt any recoil that would even come close to knocking me down. At the very most I might lose my balance if I was standing awkwardly.

Any recoiling firearm powerful enough to knock a person off their feet would be far too unsafe to be shoulder fired. You'd be facing at possible detached retinas and broken bones if you shot a gun like that.
Bear in mind that there are a lot of people out there who don't know how to handle firearms correctly. I'm sure many of us have seen, whether on television or Youtube, video of people holding pistols incorrectly and being hit in the face by the recoil. The only time in my life I have ever fired a gun, a rifle, I was about 10-11 years old, and the recoil staggered me a little.
 
I've never felt any recoil that would even come close to knocking me down. At the very most I might lose my balance if I was standing awkwardly.

Any recoiling firearm powerful enough to knock a person off their feet would be far too unsafe to be shoulder fired. You'd be facing at possible detached retinas and broken bones if you shot a gun like that.

Having thought about what you said, I can see a bullet knocking someone over mostly with surprise. If you push someone who is totally not expecting it it doesn't take all that much to get them tipping. Since getting hit by a bullet effectively makes for a push that comes literally out of nowhere I could see it having some effect. Not like 'knocked back', but if they are walking or running I could see it knocking them off stride enough to put them off their feet. Heck, I can trip over a blade of grass it seems like sometimes.
 
Having thought about what you said, I can see a bullet knocking someone over mostly with surprise. If you push someone who is totally not expecting it it doesn't take all that much to get them tipping. Since getting hit by a bullet effectively makes for a push that comes literally out of nowhere I could see it having some effect. Not like 'knocked back', but if they are walking or running I could see it knocking them off stride enough to put them off their feet. Heck, I can trip over a blade of grass it seems like sometimes.

Undoubtedly there is a psychological aspect which might give the appearance of being knocked over. Knowing and believing you've been shot must be traumatic and shocking. Conversely, some people who are shot, multiple times even, don't even know about it until they notice blood or pain, mostly when adrenaline has been pumping.
 
Unfortunately, yes it is a pretty good representation, though of course showing incident after incident like that all on one little screen adds impact. You would probably have to take the whole country over a period of days to get that. Of course you also have to consider that that was just incidents that happened to be recorded. Most aren't.

As to the car accidents, those are the end of police chases and the 'accident' probably involved the cops running the car off the road in the first place. Once there is a good car crashing out of control to account for injuries though it does provide a certain opportunity for law enforcement.

Okay I'm going to have to ask you to provide some verifiable data from a reputable source that shows these types of incidents are an accurate representation of police operating procedures and not just a mash-up of the worst cops being passed off as "this is the norm" by the maker of the video.

You can't just make the claim that something like this is an accurate portrayal of policing in the US without some hard data to back it up.
 
am I really dumb or can we do like 300 [m/s] * .013 [kg/fourty cailber bullet]/136 kg = 0.03 m/s

300 lb man standing still, inelastic collision

?

edit:

K
 
I've never felt any recoil that would even come close to knocking me down. At the very most I might lose my balance if I was standing awkwardly.

Any recoiling firearm powerful enough to knock a person off their feet would be far too unsafe to be shoulder fired. You'd be facing at possible detached retinas and broken bones if you shot a gun like that.

When you shoot, you expect the recoil and brace for it. Almost any firearm has enough kick if you are leaning the wrong way. Similarly, being hit can throw you off balance, particularly if unexpected. The same would be true of any force. It is a standard demonstration to have a person stand straight, knees locked, weight on the heels and chest pass a basket ball. It will send them over backward.

In the case of someone leaning forward, a bullet in the back could knock them flat, but one in the chest would only stand them up slightly. If the endorphins are pumping, they literally might not notice.

J
 
When you shoot, you expect the recoil and brace for it.

You don't if you know what you're doing. Anticipating and bracing against recoil is a common mistake in shooting. The rifle butt should be held firmly against the shoulder to keep it from biting, but other than that, your stance and posture should rather be loose and casual.

There's no danger of being knocked over and no need to brace for impact.

It is a standard demonstration to have a person stand straight, knees locked, weight on the heels and chest pass a basket ball. It will send them over backward.

I don't play Basketball, but locking your knees is another big no no when shooting.
 
Okay I'm going to have to ask you to provide some verifiable data from a reputable source that shows these types of incidents are an accurate representation of police operating procedures and not just a mash-up of the worst cops being passed off as "this is the norm" by the maker of the video.

You can't just make the claim that something like this is an accurate portrayal of policing in the US without some hard data to back it up.

Do you think every misbehaving cop gets put on video? Documented in any way? Even when there is some sort of repercussions there's still no documentation. The only crimes the FBI doesn't collect data on are crimes by cops. Lawsuits are settled with minimal distribution of any information at all. So it would be quite literally 'hard data'.

I've tracked my own town and the neighboring town which share police services that they get from the county, which between us has averaged over one police shooting per month for as long as I've paid attention. Beatings don't make the papers, so not much I can do about tracking that. Now, some police shootings are undoubtedly justified, some even unavoidable. But for half a million people one getting killed every month is a pretty steep rate. Slightly higher than the homicide rate, nationally.

Anecdotally, a guy I know reported his car stolen since it was required for the insurance claim. Surprisingly the cops recovered his car, and proudly told him they had broken the guy's arm when they caught him. I have to think if they are so blase about that that they expect regular citizens to appreciate it that it isn't too far from ordinary.

Also anecdotally, a kid that grew up running with my kids became a cop. He tried to remain social with his old pals, and within six months was telling them about busts that 'got hairy' and of all things sending them pictures of assorted shocking scenes...including a couple of 'this guy spit on my partner' or 'this guy smarted off' cameos before all his old friends told him that he needed new ones. Again, if applying a beating is such a run of the mill event that young cops are trying to use it for show off points with their old buds, how rare can it really be?

But, the flip side is that I am fairly sure I am living in the turf of one of the very worst police organizations the country has to offer. So yeah, I'll just give you that maybe I overstate how bad things are generally.
 
You don't if you know what you're doing. Anticipating and bracing against recoil is a common mistake in shooting. The rifle butt should be held firmly against the shoulder to keep it from biting, but other than that, your stance and posture should rather be loose and casual.

There's no danger of being knocked over and no need to brace for impact.



I don't play Basketball, but locking your knees is another big no no when shooting.

If by mistake you mean flinching, that is clearly correct. I understand what you are saying. Stroke the trigger so that the exact moment of the shot is a surprise. Loose in the sense of not rigid, yes. Not casual. You want your weight slightly forward, on the balls of the feet, not the heels. You are poised to absorb the recoil by rocking back slightly.

Imagine being in a shooting stance and getting the recoil between the shoulder blades. Would that not knock you forward?

J
 
Do you think every misbehaving cop gets put on video? Documented in any way? Even when there is some sort of repercussions there's still no documentation. The only crimes the FBI doesn't collect data on are crimes by cops. Lawsuits are settled with minimal distribution of any information at all. So it would be quite literally 'hard data'.

I've tracked my own town and the neighboring town which share police services that they get from the county, which between us has averaged over one police shooting per month for as long as I've paid attention. Beatings don't make the papers, so not much I can do about tracking that. Now, some police shootings are undoubtedly justified, some even unavoidable. But for half a million people one getting killed every month is a pretty steep rate. Slightly higher than the homicide rate, nationally.

Anecdotally, a guy I know reported his car stolen since it was required for the insurance claim. Surprisingly the cops recovered his car, and proudly told him they had broken the guy's arm when they caught him. I have to think if they are so blase about that that they expect regular citizens to appreciate it that it isn't too far from ordinary.

Also anecdotally, a kid that grew up running with my kids became a cop. He tried to remain social with his old pals, and within six months was telling them about busts that 'got hairy' and of all things sending them pictures of assorted shocking scenes...including a couple of 'this guy spit on my partner' or 'this guy smarted off' cameos before all his old friends told him that he needed new ones. Again, if applying a beating is such a run of the mill event that young cops are trying to use it for show off points with their old buds, how rare can it really be?

But, the flip side is that I am fairly sure I am living in the turf of one of the very worst police organizations the country has to offer. So yeah, I'll just give you that maybe I overstate how bad things are generally.

Sounds like you are living with some pretty rotten cops. At least the worst I have to deal with is corrupt cops. The police here are just focused on bilking as much money out of the people as they can with speed traps and citations for just about anything. I remember the local news here about 8 or 9 years ago that said the cops were looking for people who slid off the road due to icy conditions during the winter. The cops would provide the necessary assistance to get the driver back on the road or take care of any injuries, but then they would issue them a reckless driving citation as well.

So while it sucks that they could slam you with a ticket at anytime for almost anything, at least you're not as likely to catch a beating from our police. Not much money to be made in beating people senseless I guess.
 
You can see the guy in the video stiffen up and set himself cause he knows precisely when it's coming. Even then it pushes him back a bit.

If he were relaxed and not knowing its coming, the effect would probably be even greater.

Ok, before everyone eats their turkeys today, set them on a table a few inches from the edge and shoot it with a pistol to make it fall off the table. :p That's a 10-25 turkey, now when it doesn't move very much, imagine trying to get any movement out of a 300 lb person.

He doesn't look like he's bracing himself from falling over backwards, he's bracing himself for a poke to the gut. Its not a pleasant feeling to get poked in the gut when you are not expecting it. Ask anyone who has even had a ball thrown to their gut when they weren't ready to catch it.

If Brown was standing straight up, on his tippy toes, on a tightrope, then maybe the shot would have sent him backwards.
 
Sounds like you are living with some pretty rotten cops. At least the worst I have to deal with is corrupt cops. The police here are just focused on bilking as much money out of the people as they can with speed traps and citations for just about anything. I remember the local news here about 8 or 9 years ago that said the cops were looking for people who slid off the road due to icy conditions during the winter. The cops would provide the necessary assistance to get the driver back on the road or take care of any injuries, but then they would issue them a reckless driving citation as well.

So while it sucks that they could slam you with a ticket at anytime for almost anything, at least you're not as likely to catch a beating from our police. Not much money to be made in beating people senseless I guess.

We get our share of random taxation too. One of the two cities started exploring the concept of starting their own police department when the current contract with the county runs out. Suddenly it seemed the people had become totally compliant with city ordinances, so no revenue. The idea was promptly dropped.
 
If by mistake you mean flinching, that is clearly correct. I understand what you are saying. Stroke the trigger so that the exact moment of the shot is a surprise. Loose in the sense of not rigid, yes. Not casual. You want your weight slightly forward, on the balls of the feet, not the heels. You are poised to absorb the recoil by rocking back slightly.


J

I assume you mean that you stand in a way that minimises the recoil rather than bracing against it per se, then. Leaning forward is a bit of a controversial one; some military shooters are taught to lean quite pronouncedly. I've never done that, but I do stand pretty much side-on and on the balls of the feet, as you say, but I certainly don't rock backwards when I fire. Shotgun and gallery rifle shooters often stand pretty much square to the target, and standing target rifle shooters actually lean back slightly so as to rest the left elbow on their body. As for trigger release, the goal is to apply a uniform pressure and not make any reaction when it fires - not to be surprised by the shot going off! There are cases when precise shot timing is an advantage, especially when shooting one-handed pistol or a reasonably heavy rifle in the standing position, because the sights are moving around the target. I've heard that some prone rifle shooters fire between heartbeats, but I've never done that, either in military sniper rifle shooting or civilian match rifle. In the latter discipline, though, precise timing is essential so that you can keep on top of the wind - which means that you have to know when it's going to go off!
 
Hang on, innocent deaths at the hands of thugs in uniform are the price we pay for orderly society? That is almost the exact excuse Goering used to disregard civilian deaths during the Night of the Long Knives.

Yes, because that is exactly the context that I was speaking to.


This sounds all fair and good; until, despite you obeying all instructions, a cop starts stomping on the back of your head, or they pull a gun on you and start yelling, or they drop their knee into the back of your neck while you're handcuffed on the ground. These are all things I have seen on Cops, by the way, which means they are apparently considered acceptable behaviour from American police officers, or they wouldn't do it with television cameras to hand.

In the vast overwhelming majority of cases, if you follow a cops instructions, the worst that is going to happen to you is that you go to jail for a night. If a mistake has been made, this will often NOT occur. A supervisor on scene will release you or you will be released from jail after a few hours by a judge or supervisor there.



I wonder if you'll bother reading this?

I won't. Videos are at least somewhat credible. Wikipedia is not a peer reviewed, academic resource. I didn't watch the video because I was well aware before hand that the poster chose an extreme case to attempt to prove a point, which is completely irrelevant to what I have been saying all along.



BOTTOM LINE

There have been a lot of you that seem to want to be intentionally obtuse in order to try and win an argument. If that is the case, then bugger off.

For those that genuinely misunderstand: When I said you should obey the orders of the police, I have clearly and repeatedly stated that I am talking about cases where you feel that the stop is unfair or you have been otherwise mistreated, not cases in which the cop is beating you for no reason. This is a similar situation to what appears to have occurred with Mike Brown, with the exception that he clearly did do something wrong. I have clearly stated that the aim of what I have been saying is to prevent escalation and violence from occurring in the first place by moderating your actions and cooperating, and then pressing your case later, the proper way.

Common sense should prevail, and if you're being beaten senselessly or if the cop is attempting to kill you, I think we can dispense with the rules and slip into survival mode. In the very small fraction of cases where this actually occurs, feel free to disregard my recommendations. In the 99.9 percent of cases where the cop is giving you reasonable instructions, whether you did something wrong or not, simply follow those instructions. If you resist and initiate violent resistance, you WILL catch a beating and rightfully so. If you assault a cop, you risk death, and rightfully so.

Some of you seem to want to argue that because a very small fraction of police encounters end with police abuse, that it gives you the right to resist arrest and assault police officers, if you think you are being treated unfairly. It does not. The police have a dangerous, difficult, and stressful job to do. Follow their (reasonable) instructions, go to jail, if necessary, and pursue redress through the proper channels. If you attack a cop, I support the cop's right to use force to subdue you. You are the same as those trying to argue that we shouldn't wear seat belts because they end up contributing to your death in 0.00000000001% of cases.
 
My favourite examples in the various videos are the ones where the various police order the various guys in the various wheelchairs to stand up. He 'fails to comply' (perhaps something to do with can't stand up - wheelchair being the clue ) and then gets dumped on his face.

Awaiting the usual apologists rationalisations of the unjustifiable.
 
Some of you seem to want to argue that because a very small fraction of police encounters end with police abuse, that it gives you the right to resist arrest and assault police officers, if you think you are being treated unfairly. It does not. The police have a dangerous, difficult, and stressful job to do. Follow their (reasonable) instructions, go to jail, if necessary, and pursue redress through the proper channels. If you attack a cop, I support the cop's right to use force to subdue you. You are the same as those trying to argue that we shouldn't wear seat belts because they end up contributing to your death in 0.00000000001% of cases.

I'm sorry but I'm curious; who argues for that now?
 
There have been a lot of you that seem to want to be intentionally obtuse in order to try and win an argument. If that is the case, then bugger off.

For those that genuinely misunderstand: When I said you should obey the orders of the police, I have clearly and repeatedly stated that I am talking about cases where you feel that the stop is unfair or you have been otherwise mistreated, not cases in which the cop is beating you for no reason. This is a similar situation to what appears to have occurred with Mike Brown, with the exception that he clearly did do something wrong. I have clearly stated that the aim of what I have been saying is to prevent escalation and violence from occurring in the first place by moderating your actions and cooperating, and then pressing your case later, the proper way.

Common sense should prevail, and if you're being beaten senselessly or if the cop is attempting to kill you, I think we can dispense with the rules and slip into survival mode. In the very small fraction of cases where this actually occurs, feel free to disregard my recommendations. In the 99.9 percent of cases where the cop is giving you reasonable instructions, whether you did something wrong or not, simply follow those instructions. If you resist and initiate violent resistance, you WILL catch a beating and rightfully so. If you assault a cop, you risk death, and rightfully so.

Some of you seem to want to argue that because a very small fraction of police encounters end with police abuse, that it gives you the right to resist arrest and assault police officers, if you think you are being treated unfairly. It does not. The police have a dangerous, difficult, and stressful job to do. Follow their (reasonable) instructions, go to jail, if necessary, and pursue redress through the proper channels. If you attack a cop, I support the cop's right to use force to subdue you. You are the same as those trying to argue that we shouldn't wear seat belts because they end up contributing to your death in 0.00000000001% of cases.

Just so I know I'm not being intentionally obtuse: I think you are absolutely correct that if you just follow orders no matter how unreasonable it is very unlikely the police will beat you 'just because'.

Now, so I can figure out if you are being intentionally obtuse: Are you advocating that if a cop gives a string of increasingly unreasonable demands and is verbally abusive, then when one of his orders is not obeyed to his satisfaction beats the snot out of someone, the beating was justified by their disobedience? Or are you trying to say that that never happens? Or are you willing to acknowledge that there is a problem here that actually can't be solved by simple 'orderly society being orderly'?

My favourite examples in the various videos are the ones where the various police order the various guys in the various wheelchairs to stand up. He 'fails to comply' (perhaps something to do with can't stand up - wheelchair being the clue ) and then gets dumped on his face.

Awaiting the usual apologists rationalisations of the unjustifiable.

They gave him an order and he clearly refused. Beating justified.
 
Back
Top Bottom