So, the purge of members and posts in a group apparently for an AoE multiplayer game just happened to coincide with the accusations? That's mighty convenient since with that "excuse", you A.) Explain why Olaf (Mongolia) and SK (Byzantine) were kicked and B.) Why, even if the group was set to public, the posts would be deleted.
Except the group description doesn't point to the group being for a multiplayer game. Even if that point is ignored, it doesn't explain why the posts
and members would be kicked out.
So, a run down.
-Age of Empires Social Group is created November 1st, one day following the sign-up thread is posted. The group is originally founded by Germany, Byzantine, and Russia. Mongolia later joins group.
-Social Group is linked in thread. Accusations and immediately labeled wild conspiracy theory by one AoE member. The AoE GM oddly ignores accusations and talks about Age of Empires and CivIV. The problem with the latter is this.
This is odd way to phase it, given the fact Kiwitt created the popular Road to War modmod, the Historical Edition. However, we can also ignore that if you will.
-AoE group has members purged and 85% of posts deleted. Group is set from Invite to Moderated. This
after the accusations. Official reason is that SK and Olaf didn't show up. However, why delete posts after getting rid all the members of the group? If the group is set to moderated, then there would be no reason to get rid of the posts as the logical thing to do would be to show players not playing in the AoE multiplayer game the group.
-Since then, the Communist Union SG, a
Revolution Social Group has seen VERY recent activity again. Note: Revolution ended a year ago and Kiwitt was not a player.
http://forums.civfanatics.com/group.php?groupid=387