Lactation is abortion and left

[JollyRoger]

What is the deal with breastfeeders? They have already leeched off another person for nine months without any sign of being marginally non-dependent and now they expect the person they leeched off of to continue to make personal sacrifice. It seems that it is not in anyone's rational self-interest to continue such a deviant lifestyle of dependency. Breastfeeding only kills the child's motivation to learn to be self-reliant and continues the woman's downward spiral of not looking out for herself - of continuing the mistake she made by not terminating the pregnancy. Next thing you know, the breastfeeding little tyke will expect to leech off of the breasted one and others for many years to come and even reach a point of a decade and a half or more of non-contribution before realizing the importance of rational self-reliance. At that point, there may be some lashing out at others. He will scold those paying taxes as similar to the one who had sacrificed her breastmilk to others. He will scold those relying on government services as similar to what he did when he stole or extorted breatmilk from the woman. It is not a pretty sight. It has drained both mother and leech of any real life and the ability to go Galt has been lost before the kid had a chance. Game over.

 

[Glassfan]

So, you're a mean drunk?

 

[Antilogic]

So, you're a mean drunk?

No, he's become a randroid. If you can't fend for yourself and produce goods to exchange for breastmilk, you don't deserve to have it.

 

[Core Imposter]

The implict contract is that the child will care for the aging parent as payment in kind. Worked well before they invented (texas) lawyers intent on relitigating infinity.

 

[Antilogic]

The implict contract is that the child will care for the aging parent as payment in kind. Worked well before they invented (texas) lawyers intent on relitigating infinity.

Implicit contract? I don't think we are fans of that.

 

[Core Imposter]

A legally enforceable agreement that arises from conduct, from assumed intentions, from some relationship among the immediate parties, or from the application of the legal principle of equity.

For example, a contract is implied when a party knowingly accepts a benefit from another party in circumstances where the benefit cannot be considered a gift. Therefore, the party accepting the benefit is under a legal obligation to give fair value for the benefit received. Opposite of express contract. See also express contract, implied in fact contract, and implied in law contract.


Read more: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/implied-contract.html#ixzz28UPuaUP8

 

[Antilogic]

So tell me, is an infant that cannot even speak mentally competent to undertake a contract? Is there a real meeting of the minds there?

 

[Crezth]

The implict contract is that the child will care for the aging parent as payment in kind. Worked well before they invented (texas) lawyers intent on relitigating infinity.

I know plenty of folks who don't bother to care for their aging parents. Good on them: rational self-actors they.

 

[Core Imposter]

So tell me, is an infant that cannot even speak mentally competent to undertake a contract? Is there a real meeting of the minds there?

Breastfeeding predates contract law. I was only relating this to something randroids might get their tentacles around.

 

[Core Imposter]

I know plenty of folks who don't bother to care for their aging parents. Good on them: rational self-actors they.

Scary they, scary you.
I'd run if you said boo.

 

[Zelig]

A legally enforceable agreement that arises from conduct, from assumed intentions, from some relationship among the immediate parties, or from the application of the legal principle of equity.

For example, a contract is implied when a party knowingly accepts a benefit from another party in circumstances where the benefit cannot be considered a gift. Therefore, the party accepting the benefit is under a legal obligation to give fair value for the benefit received. Opposite of express contract. See also express contract, implied in fact contract, and implied in law contract.


Read more: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/implied-contract.html#ixzz28UPuaUP8

Well if the business dictionary says so.

 

[Borachio]

A legally enforceable agreement that arises from conduct, from assumed intentions, from some relationship among the immediate parties, or from the application of the legal principle of equity.

For example, a contract is implied when a party knowingly accepts a benefit from another party in circumstances where the benefit cannot be considered a gift. Therefore, the party accepting the benefit is under a legal obligation to give fair value for the benefit received. Opposite of express contract. See also express contract, implied in fact contract, and implied in law contract.

I like the use of the word "express" here in the context of breast feeding.

But there is a contract between mother and child. And a system of reciprocal payments already in place.

The mother receives a very great deal in return for her milk. The baby, after being fed, will frequently rapidly fall asleep allowing the mother some much needed peace and quiet for...oh...up to 2 hours. On waking the baby goes into entertainment mode with coy smiles and giggles and amusing waggling of the arms and legs.

Very few mothers seem unhappy with the arrangement. Perhaps surprisingly.

 

[holy king]

yeah, it's basically like getting a tamagochi.

 

[RobAnybody]

No, he's right.

Also, fractions are contortions and bereft.

If we can string together meaningless words in a title, implying they are relatated even if they aren't, then the mere power to do so implies that these are factual realities. As evidenced by our ability to put words in the same sentence, these must be related causalities.

It's quite clear to me, as it should be to you.

Definition: fractions are a one number over another another number. These require contortions, because I said so.

It leaves one bereft of the fraction that is not represented, like if I made up a number, say 3/5ths, you are now bereft of 2/5ths, because reasons. I don't have to support it, you are. QED. And take that.

Therefore, JollyRoger's premise is correct. It should be obvious.

EDIT: 18 & Life tag? Why not I Remember You?

 

[Leoreth]

I think the problem with fractions is that they're discriminatory. I mean we literally put one number over the other. Have you noticed that it's almost always different numbers that are separated by fractions? You may say that it's just numbers, but this practice is exerting massive amounts of normative pressure on our children, and they are even taught this practice in our schools! How long until they will start to put certain kinds of people over others? Math is destroying our society!

Mathematicians should be required by law to insert the inverse of every fraction they use into their equation to ensure number equality.

 

[rugbyLEAGUEfan]

Wow, who'd have thought a practicing lawyer could so readily pawn a 16 year old?

 

[GoodGame]

No, he's become a randroid. If you can't fend for yourself and produce goods to exchange for breastmilk, you don't deserve to have it.

In Ann Rand's case, it was meth. I wonder if she cooked her own meth or begged for it.

Or I guess trading fiction works for meth is high moral imperative?

 

[Birdjaguar]

What is the deal with breastfeeders? They have already leeched off another person for nine months without any sign of being marginally non-dependent and now they expect the person they leeched off of to continue to make personal sacrifice. It seems that it is not in anyone's rational self-interest to continue such a deviant lifestyle of dependency. Breastfeeding only kills the child's motivation to learn to be self-reliant and continues the woman's downward spiral of not looking out for herself - of continuing the mistake she made by not terminating the pregnancy. Next thing you know, the breastfeeding little tyke will expect to leech off of the breasted one and others for many years to come and even reach a point of a decade and a half or more of non-contribution before realizing the importance of rational self-reliance. At that point, there may be some lashing out at others. He will scold those paying taxes as similar to the one who had sacrificed her breastmilk to others. He will scold those relying on government services as similar to what he did when he stole or extorted breatmilk from the woman. It is not a pretty sight. It has drained both mother and leech of any real life and the ability to go Galt has been lost before the kid had a chance. Game over.

Someone was weaned too soon and has issues.

 

[Borachio]

Mother's milk:

 

[W|M]

I was never breastfed.