None Shall Pass 3 [Game Thread]

I'm new to these forums, but usually if there's a conspiracy or simple explanation it's not the conspiracy. I'm not inclined to believe Visor and Al bussed Bsmith and acted town to look towny over them just not being on SW Mafia team.

Vote: MartinLuther

Those PMs do look mighty odd though. But then why vote Visor over Al?

Why prodding scum is scummy? How else do you suggest we catch them? Voting record alone?
Lurkers should either post more, so we could see who they are, or be lynched/modkilled/etc.

I should post more. I haven't been here. >.<

I think prodding is neutral. Looks good accompanied by a bunch of solid posts and pretty bad if by itself or as filler with other filler posts. (Just my 2c)
 
Well, this is dire. What with so many people dead, I'd have thought it would be easier to see who's lurking in the background etc., but apparently fully half the game is lurking today.

For what it's worth, I don't think Visorslash is guilty (or at least of a few things that Martin is accusing him). Yes, he led the end-run on BSmith late last night for no apparent reason, but he always posts a lot and he usually changes his vote around quite a few times.

Spaceman, I already answered your objections yesterday. What else do you want from me?

That was a pressure vote, and I'm not satisfied with the response:

I have it on good authority that you were roleblocked tonight. Why not tell the world? Trying to avoid attention?

Love, now.
Why wouldn't I post when my name is mentioned? It seems perfectly reasonable to me.
I don't think I'm keeping a low profile. And what content is it you want? It's not like you post a lot either.

The reason I don't post much is because I don't know who the mafia are. Visorslash, Al Sipsclar and Martin Luther are all under suspicion by y'all, but I could also see that they are towns trying their best. I somewhat suspect those who don't post much, but they could feel like me, or simply be busy.

But what with the suspicion and all, vote: Visorslash

ladies and gentlemen, I give you, the reasoning behind today's leading wagon


_________________


Azzaman, elaborate?
 
That was a pressure vote, and I'm not satisfied with the response:

I have it on good authority that you were roleblocked tonight. Why not tell the world? Trying to avoid attention?



ladies and gentlemen, I give you, the reasoning behind today's leading wagon


_________________


Azzaman, elaborate?
robbiecon claims to have done nothing last night. There's some pretty compelling evidence that suggests this is a blatant lie.
 
unvote: vote Robbiecon

Arakhor can wait for tomorrow. This demands an explanation


Also: This is a public service announcement: There are 4 hours left in the day
 
Why prodding scum is scummy? How else do you suggest we catch them? Voting record alone?
Lurkers should either post more, so we could see who they are, or be lynched/modkilled/etc.
Not saying that, just the last several games I've been in, the post count total posters have been scum. It's often a good way to look active without providing much.
Not persuasive in and of itself.


But you're pretty trigger happy with your voting.


Joking is also scummy apparently. What's with wanting Visor dead so early? Mild tunneling.

In addition:


This post is weird and feels overthought for normally simple juncture.

Cuth's other posts include, a hypothetical question none of us would know the answer to, a vague back-stepping statement about alignment, defending Al, and some early game piffle. This is all rather trippy for town Cuth.

Vote:Cuthillius
True, it isn't, but I'm honestly not digging into this game a ton at the moment and it's something to vote for.

I have been since I don't know who to vote for;note: scum game RedD I was not this lackadaisical as regards voting.

Again, lack of options I felt better about, I don't know. Visor reads a little off to me and a tad too trusted by town.

To be fair, I don't know what I meant by that post either.
You are joking, aren't you? What next - you'll be criticising me for not crossing out my un-votes too?
This is a bit aggressive for response to a vote. You're now officially on my suspicion list, congrats. You're normally more measured when provoked.
robbiecon claims to have done nothing last night. There's some pretty compelling evidence that suggests this is a blatant lie.
Fair enough.

Vote:Robbiecon
 
For the record, Cuthilius, we often post impromptu tallies in our games here at CFC, but when half the game was not posting or voting, I thought it unusual enough to mention the posting records too. This is also not without precedent here.

For that matter, since Pigeon seems not to be responding at all, keeping my vote on him seems pointless. I don't have anything particular on (or need to vote for) Visorslash or Lohrenswald, so let's pursue this new lead. Vote: Robbiecon.

Rough Tally
Robbiecon: Azzaman333, Xym, Spaceman, Cuthilius, Arakhor
Visorslash: MartinLuther, Jarrema, Lohrenswald
Lohrenswald: Al Sipsclar, Robbiecon, KingMorgan
MartinLuther: Sprig, Snerk
Arakhor: Visorslash
Al Sipsclar: dcmort93
Snerk: Kennigit
Cuthilius: Legato Endless

Not Voting: DoubleA, Landlubber, Newyn, Pouter Pigeon, SouthernKing, VGL
 
Sorry for the general absence. I have had a very busy couple of days. I've been playing catch-up since the pm's I sent at the beginning of the day. I wanted to vote for Robbiecon, mostly based on a hunch, but seeing how many votes he has I'm not sure it's necessary. Might be worth pushing other wagons and if Robbie is scum I think Visor might be too so vote;Visor

I have more thoughts but I can't write any more now.
 
Tally:

Spoiler :
6 robbiecon (azzaman333, spaceman98, Xym, Cuthillius, Arakhor, Al Sipsclar)

4 Visorslash (MartinLuther, Jarrema, Lohrenswald, Pouter Pigeon)

2 Lohrensald (robbiecon**, KingMorgan)
2 MartinLuther (Sprig*, Snerk)

1 Arakhor (Visorslash)
1 Al Sipsclar (dcmort93)
1 Cuthillius (Legato Endless)
1 Snerk (Kennigit)

Not Posting: Double A, landlubber, Newyn, SouthernKing*, VGL**

Each * represents one Day phase, excluding the current Day, without a post in the thread.

[TIMER=10/14/2015 11:00 PM CDT; Day Three Over]tunnel snakes rule[/TIMER]
 
Yeah, I have been more quiet than usual due to several different things (don't ever bet on being sober enough to play mafia after making a drinking game out of a US political debate), but I'll be more active from here on out. Fall break just started, which means I have a lot more time, and I intend on rereading the thread tomorrow.

I'm not a fan of the Visor wagon at all. Vote:MartinLuther. Still have weird feelings about him, his votes have all seemed really sheepy so far.
 
Sorry for the general absence. I have had a very busy couple of days. I've been playing catch-up since the pm's I sent at the beginning of the day. I wanted to vote for Robbiecon, mostly based on a hunch, but seeing how many votes he has I'm not sure it's necessary. Might be worth pushing other wagons and if Robbie is scum I think Visor might be too so vote;Visor

I have more thoughts but I can't write any more now.

As an addendum, let me just say that this post was typed in a hurry, and without reading the thread, as I though that that might be the last time I would get even a brief chance of voting before the day ended. I have a little bit more time now, and I've caught up a little more, so here's an explanation/my thoughts on a couple of things:

When I said I wanted to lynch Robbie on a hunch, that was before I read the thread, and I didn't realize that there was more definite information incriminating him. My vote on Visor was based on a half-baked theory which makes less sense the more I think about it, so I'll unvote, vote; Martin Luther because I don't trust the weird pm exchange he posted. I'm still not voting Robbiecon because I don't like adding an unnecessary vote to a wagon that's already in the lead. I don't know if that's valid or not strategically, but meh.

RE: Cuthilius and Arakhor's exchange about post counts, I'd like to speak on this since I'm usually a proponent of the post count scum tell. It's often scummy behaviour when it's used to both artificially boost how contributive you look to the thread and pump the thread with potentially misleading information by trying to lynch people based on numbers without actually reading their posts. In his case, however, it looks to me like a sincere attempt to try to point out an extreme lack of activity and prod those with a low post count to be more active.

For the record I also have Cuthilius as a mild town lean simply because in his last scum game (Red Dwarf) I was able to read him almost instantly, and I'm not picking up the same vibe in this game that I was in that one. This could also be because Cuthilius is a good player, or because I'm not as good a player as I think.

That's all I have time for for now.
 
These are the lowest-posting, still-living players:

Legato Endless - 9
Lohrenswald - 9
KingMorgan - 8
Newyn - 7
Jarrema - 7
azzaman333 - 6
Pouter Pigeon - 5
Double A - 4
Xym - 3
landlubber - 3
robbiecon - 2
SouthernKing - 1

FOS arakhor

You are already planning to kill me tonight aren't you?
 
Back
Top Bottom