Core Imposter
Felon
- Joined
- May 13, 2011
- Messages
- 5,515
Santorum told Puerto Ricans they need to speak english if they want to become a state, solid tactic to win votes from them.
Yes, these silly non-pandering truth telling conservatives. So 1950.
Santorum told Puerto Ricans they need to speak english if they want to become a state, solid tactic to win votes from them.
Sanitorium got killed in his last senate bid in PA... slaughtered. There is more than one reason... such as, most Repubs got slaughtered in that election in states anywhere near purple... but more importantly, the people knew him better by then. He lost by 16 or 18 points I believe.
I think Romney would do way better in PA... based on being more moderate, and a lot of anti-Obama angst with the coal industry, etc. However, Romney not being the most union friendly would hurt him.
Could Romney win Mass? Maybe... very tough sell there... solidly blue state, and while he did win it at the state level, it's different.
Romney wins N Hampshire, Maine... maybe Rhode Island... loses CT, NY...
Midwestern states are fed up with Obama, generally speaking. Iowa would be a toss up... IN and OH, Romney's... Could Romney win MI? Maybe... He's known there, his dad, etc... They've been tipping more conservative than previously. Wisconsin? Maybe, also leaning more conservative recently... Illinios? Hahahahaha, no way. Missouri? Yes, Obama's lost ground there. KS & the other farm states... yes. MN? Doubtful...
Out west?
UT, AZ, AK... duh... Colorader? Hmmm... toss up. NM? Maybe, slim chance. I think Romney can appeal to hispanics pretty well. Cowboy states & ID? Yes. Oregon? I have no clue. WA? Fat chance.
CA & HI, Romney loses... even a reincarnated, fully vigorous Reagan couldn't win that one these days!
Other states, as I see it..
FL, Romney all the way, lots of retirees from the NE make this almost a shoe in.
TX, duh... most of the south? Pretty solidly red. NC? Toss up. VA? Romney.
This is of course if the election were tomorrow. With continuing to rise gas prices and a still struggling economy, it's looking more and more like Obama loses.
I was trying to limit the size of my post, but you make a fair point.You are going to have to provide a little more analysis for these predictions. It looks like you just pulled random state abbreviations and candidates out of a hat. For example, why is North Carolina, where Obama won by 0.32%, a toss-up while Virgina, where Obama won by 6.3%, a solid Romney? I also don't get why you think New England is going to fly to Romney, Obama won all those states by 20-40 points. If those are flipping Republican, then it doesn't matter who the Republican candidate is.
It isn't a truth. Do you think all the Hawaiians had to speak English to become a state?Yes, these silly non-pandering truth telling conservatives. So 1950.
And I don't mean the 50s you see on I Love Lucy.I was trying to limit the size of my post, but you make a fair point.
NC, no gubernatorial elections this time around to mess with things (I believe), whereas VA, the Old Dominion, is leaning repub now (including Gub)...
N Hampshire was not won by 20-40 points (ten point race, when McCain was a total loss... somewhat strong conservative movement there, mainly due to libertarians)! Mass was, sure, I said Mitt could do well there, being his state with a history of supporting him... still tough.
Maine, could really go either way, again, N Englanders take pride in all things N England. Obama won there by 17, it will be tough... RI, it's been leaning somewhat more conservative recently. Looking further into election results though, you are right... It will go Obama.
NY and CT, well, I don't see them shifting. Solid dem states.
THat's hardly Romney flying in N England, it just means, he won't get the typical NE shut out handed to him.
My list is admittedly optimistic... I support Romney, and Romney only, for this election.
Touche.

Yes, these silly non-pandering truth telling conservatives. So 1950.
There is no chance Mitt Romney wins any New England state besides New Hampshire. Mitt would have lost by at least 10 points had he stood for reelection in MA....he is not a popular man there. Socially, he is 100% out of step with every single state.Could Romney win Mass? Maybe... very tough sell there... solidly blue state, and while he did win it at the state level, it's different.
Romney wins N Hampshire, Maine... maybe Rhode Island... loses CT, NY...
Santorum would honestly be more competitive in the midwest than Romney I think. Mitt supported wildly unpopular anti-union legislation in Ohio, and has marched lockstep with a Gov that has a 30% approval rating. Wisconsin may have a conservative gov, but Obama has also led by 10 points in just about every state level poll. There are apparently a decent number of Walker-Obama voters. I think Iowa and Indiana are the only real pickup places.Midwestern states are fed up with Obama, generally speaking. Iowa would be a toss up... IN and OH, Romney's... Could Romney win MI? Maybe... He's known there, his dad, etc... They've been tipping more conservative than previously. Wisconsin? Maybe, also leaning more conservative recently... Illinios? Hahahahaha, no way. Missouri? Yes, Obama's lost ground there. KS & the other farm states... yes. MN? Doubtful...
Why? He doesn't speak spanish and he's against worker visas. He has the strongest anti-immigration platform of the three major candidates.Out west?
UT, AZ, AK... duh... Colorader? Hmmm... toss up. NM? Maybe, slim chance. I think Romney can appeal to hispanics pretty well.
North Carolina (and VA) is not the same state that it was in 1970. It has become substantially more Latino, and is attracting a lot of Democratic-leaning young professionals that are fleeing states like Missouri and Ohio. NC, VA and CO are going to be battleground states for the near future. I'm not saying Mitt can't or won't win NC in 2012 (it will be tough without strong black and latino showings), but I don't think anybody wins it easily for a while.If Obama wins in NC this fall its going to have to be against Romney. Santorum or Newt or the candidate to be named all win easily here.
Edit: Prior to going for Obama NC last went for a democrat on Carter's first run. I think NC should be in the red column even if the liberal Romney is in the race, though Romneyfeller is capable of losing every single close state.
Agree to disagree.There is no chance Mitt Romney wins any New England state besides New Hampshire. Mitt would have lost by at least 10 points had he stood for reelection in MA....he is not a popular man there. Socially, he is 100% out of step with every single state.
But the midwest and the south isn't enough.Santorum would honestly be more competitive in the midwest than Romney I think.
I think you are underestimating the anti-Obama sentiment in the state.Mitt supported wildly unpopular anti-union legislation in Ohio, and has marched lockstep with a Gov that has a 30% approval rating.
I only said this was a maybe... I don't think Sanitorium would be a shoe in here.Wisconsin may have a conservative gov, but Obama has also led by 10 points in just about every state level poll. There are apparently a decent number of Walker-Obama voters.
I thought you knew more about Mitt than this? He can actually claim Mexican citizenship, should he so please... and perhaps run for President there after he wins here, making him the first Dualy!Why? He doesn't speak spanish and he's against worker visas. He has the strongest anti-immigration platform of the three major candidates.
It's still pretty right leaning... and again, it is no foregone conclusion that Obama gets the legal hispanic votes.North Carolina (and VA) is not the same state that it was in 1970. It has become substantially more Latino, and is attracting a lot of Democratic-leaning young professionals that are fleeing states like Missouri and Ohio.
Probably none... he's a stronger candidate than McCain, and running against a different Obama, one who has shown he wasn't really worthy of the hype... in a stagnant economy.What states did McCain win that you think Romney will lose?
I'll agree that your list is optimistic.
New Hampshire was the only "close" state in NE, and Obama won that one by 10 points. Maine was 17 points in Obama's favor. While I can see NH as a tossup, I don't think it's leaning heavily Republican nor is it particularly important for the Republicans to hit 270 EVs. Rhode Island was 28 points up for Obama in the last election; what indicators are you talking about that it is leaning more conservative?
You can support whoever you want, but it doesn't mean we can ignore reality in these states.
If Obama wins in NC this fall its going to have to be against Romney. Santorum or Newt or the candidate to be named all win easily here.
Edit: Prior to going for Obama NC last went for a democrat on Carter's first run. I think NC should be in the red column even if the liberal Romney is in the race, though Romneyfeller is capable of losing every single close state.
You act as if the discussion about gay marriage and birth control was started by the liberal camp.In the end, it will come down to the economy and gas... All these stupid issues that the media is throwing about like gay marriage and birth control... it's to take the spotlight off the economy. Pretty obvious ploy... but if the economy doesn't get markedly better... siyonara Obama!
Ummm, no... I point out these relatively minor issues are being blown up by the media... nowhere in that statement does it say or hint that it even matters where it started.You act as if the discussion about gay marriage and birth control was started by the liberal camp.
Every southern state + Iowa + Ohio + the super republican mountain states = 272 electoral votes. That isn't counting Colorado, New Mexico or Nevada.But the midwest and the south isn't enough.
Its possible, but I doubt it. Ohio may be a more culturally conservative state, but its very culturally blue-collar, and very pro labor. They elected a guy like Romney for Governor and they hate him.I think you are underestimating the anti-Obama sentiment in the state.
1) I'm not super sure this is true (I thought the claim on parental citizenship comes through your mother, not your father).I thought you knew more about Mitt than this? He can actually claim Mexican citizenship, should he so please... and perhaps run for President there after he wins here, making him the first Dualy!
He won nearly 70% of the Latino vote last election cycle, against a guy that had a strong pro-immigration record. Unless Mittens puts Rubio on the ticket, there is no way he's losing market share to a candidate with an anti-immigration stance.what's Obama's experience with the hispanics?
Yes, these silly non-pandering truth telling conservatives. So 1950.
There are many ways to skin the cat. True. Romney has several paths to victory... and defeat.Every southern state + Iowa + Ohio + the super republican mountain states = 272 electoral votes. That isn't counting Colorado, New Mexico or Nevada.
I don't know enough about that guy... but I also couldn't find state polling to show Obama vs Romney.Its possible, but I doubt it. Ohio may be a more culturally conservative state, but its very culturally blue-collar, and very pro labor. They elected a guy like Romney for Governor and they hate him.
He doesn't play it up for exactly those reasons (not to mention it should be irrelevant). The point is, he has some level of roots there, a connection. His son being a missionary in S America (with his approval), etc.1) I'm not super sure this is true (I thought the claim on parental citizenship comes through your mother, not your father).
2) Have you ever heard of him talking about his "Mexican Heritage"? He doesn't have any...his dad was born into an American community Mormon castaways. My grandpa was born there too. Doesn't make me Mexican.
Rubio may very well be on the ticket. Anyhow, McCain blew it on a lot of levels, so using a landslide election, that happened once, isn't that helpful.He won nearly 70% of the Latino vote last election cycle, against a guy that had a strong pro-immigration record. Unless Mittens puts Rubio on the ticket, there is no way he's losing market share to a candidate with an anti-immigration stance.
Your statement implies there's a liberal ploy to distract from the economic problems by bringing up the contraceptive and abortion debates (either by starting or promulgating them). When in fact, it was Republican candidates who started the debate, and conservative media who made a big fuss about it. So it's more the Republicans shooting their own feet than an outside attempt to weaken them.Ummm, no... I point out these relatively minor issues are being blown up by the media... nowhere in that statement does it say or hint that it even matters where it started.
Uh, sure. If you say so.Your statement implies there's a liberal ploy to distract from the economic problems by bringing up the contraceptive and abortion debates (either by starting or promulgating them). When in fact, it was Republican candidates who started the debate, and conservative media who made a big fuss about it. So it's more the Republicans shooting their own feet than an outside attempt to weaken them.