Altered Maps XII: Not to Scale

Interesting...
 
You're not going to like this map then...

eruJD.jpg

I love it :goodjob:
 
My love of Chicago says "yes"! But my dislike of unnatural borders says "no!"

Gah, I don't know what to think!
 
What about this?
Its post-apocaliptic.

I'l let you try to find the story. I made it up as I was doing it, but I'm too lazy to explain it xD


lY4E6.gif


Owen Glyndwr: Edit:

Nukes, San Andreas earthquake, desertification. All that stuff. No straight borders. Population level: Prehistorical.

Countries: Alaska (duuno why), Inuit confederacy, Quebec, Some sort of chicago, ?USA?, confederacy, Canada some caribbeans without name, mormons, texas, california , ?mexican aztecs? and many barbarians and bandits
 
It's hard to tell because you didn't exactly pick the most well-drawn map, but California looks like a confused mess.
 
Where are the great lakes in that mess? They seem conspicuously absent.
 
Hah, sounds like something we - "we" here meaning "mostly Iggy" - did in the NES forums several years ago.
 
Ours wasn't based on postcount, though. If it were, I'd rule like half the United States.

Not so much in OT, of course.
 
OT would be difficult just because the shear amount of posters crowded in several areas. I imagine Chicago, Virginia, and the North East would be crowded as hell.

Also London if Europe is included.
 
OT would be difficult just because the shear amount of posters crowded in several areas. I imagine Chicago, Virginia, and the North East would be crowded as hell.

Also London if Europe is included.
The postcount thing would clean it up significantly, but the northeastern US and the UK would be a total [mess].
 
Hm, if it were OT there should be a couple more people in Spain and many more in Australia. But it ain't, this one, right?
 
Back
Top Bottom