Borachio
Way past lunacy
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2012
- Messages
- 26,698
Yes. I can see that it shows that. But if it takes 3 weeks to get to Lyon, and 4 weeks to get to London. Why wouldn't it take 1 week to get from Lyon to London.The map only shows the time it takes to get from Rome to various destinations, so I wouldn't imagine that it actually would have taken a week to get from Lyon to London. What slowed people down the most was actually land, as land travel was a lot slower than sea travel.
They could of course have gone all the way by sea. But I'd imagine that would take a lot longer. It's a very great deal further. And would make some sense for transporting tin and wheat of course. But just in terms of travel?
Still, I don't know. It's an interesting map. The SE corner is intriguing. Wouldn't they have gone up the Nile easily enough? Which the map seems to show. And then the desert seems to be a real barrier.
As for land travel being slower, I'm not sure that someone on horseback couldn't have travelled reasonably quickly provided the roads were dry. (Yes, I realize the map is "on foot".) And Roman roads were state of the art for the times in any case, weren't they?