BNP, does anyone take them seriously?

The obvious solution is to eliminate both "the United Kingdom" and "Great Britain" as unified political entities so nobody has to worry about what a Briton is or isn't.
 
Charles Caleb Coulton said:
An Irishman fights before he reasons, a Scotchman reasons before he fights, an Englishman is not particular as to the order of precedence, but will do either to accommodate his customers

Says it all I think.
 
Man, that doesn't even make sense based on the usual stereotypes.
 
I think it might be an era thing. Coulton was writing in the early 19th century, when the stereotypical Scot was a dour Presbyterian, not averse to fighting but not particularly given to strong emotions of any kind. The stereotype of the easily-enraged Scot was essentially a stereotype of the Glasgow Irish, and only became generalised in the 1980s (for surprisingly complex social, economic and political reasons), and even today is a very regionalised one within Scotland itself. Similarly, the stereotypical Englishman of the period was a wily shopkeeper- "a nation of shopkeepers", as Boney put it- rather than the "rational imperialist" of later decades.
 
I think I prefer the Peter McDougall Gorbals Scotsman to the nineteenth century variety. :p
 
Back
Top Bottom