From that article:
The Irish agriculture minister, Michael Creed .......... said Ireland’s demand for aid from Brussels in the event of no deal would be substantial. “You’re
looking at hundreds of millions,” he told the Irish Independent. “Between the beef industry and the fishing industry we’re talking mega-money.”
EU law allows emergency aid for farmers affected by sudden market shocks; the EU released more than €1bn to help farmers cope with Russia’s
2014 ban on imports of EU produce. But officials said they would only respond to a formal request from the Irish government, if the UK left without a deal.
As the UK has no plans to ban food from Eire, I think they may need a tall story to get that dosh.
When that no-deal happens we will soon see quite some big shuffle of all kinds of non-essentials.
For example crossborder cheddar cheese going in two directions replaced by UK cheddar to UK retail and Irish cheddar going to Irish retail, with the Irish excess going to EU and else.
A re-wiring of many logistical streams decreasing the consumer's choice in the retail. The retail very busy doing that early transformation part with re-wiring.
What is left after that first stage (1 year or so ?) will be mainly the semi-essential and essential goods and services. Some non-essentials becoming more of a luxury product.
This will also reduce somewhat the transactional customs bottlenecks.
Which all will not prevent a big mess at household level.
The real disruptions will be of another nature needing timely real plans and coherent strategies. Quite a bit more solid than the current pipedream visions aimed at the public in case of a second referendum.
It needs to be based on a reality analysis what economical elements, building blocks, the UK is going to miss when not connected anymore to the EU fabric...
And (lol) the more that analysis, because of "political correctness", will skew away from reality... the worse those real plans and strategies will be.
Back to the imminent mess:
When I look at the no-deal support from our Dutch government to our (especially) small companies:
It consists ofc out of transactional info and aid money, and more importantly also out of govt aid money and other flanking actions towards these companies for finding new customers. The mechanisms were developed with the Russia sanctions needing lots of vegetables export re-wiring.
Will be interesting to see how and how fast we, especially all those relatively small companies, will adapt.
Perhaps I should add here that the Dutch government made sure to have a detailed analysis on a Brexit already before June 2016, up to our economical sectors (Germany IFO BTW in 2015).
And considering that the attitude of our government has been from the very start on Brexit that (while respecting ofc that sovereign choice) leaving the EU would be brain-dead stupid. We did not bother that much to influence the kind of Brexit, but focussed more (as usual as small country) to adapt to the changing environment from damage control to new opportunities. The RABO bank report (that 18% long term damage for the UK mainly from missed innovation wealth increases) was also to highlight how important R&D, innovation, and the subsequent industrialisation & marketing is for our country's economy growth. With a nearby UK disconnected for proximity synergies, this got extra attention the last years. (If you look into the EU funded projects you can see that we allocate 40% of that EU funding to innovation, against for example the UK 20%, or 5-10% in South & East EU countries).
It is not that I want to do grandstanding here (as too small country anyway for that), but if the UK is to develop after the knowledge disconnect, it really needs massive and coherent planning and strategies. And my guess for now is that for the interim 9 months bare bone WTO relation after the no-deal, the Parliament and the newsmedia will be fully absorbed by getting a long term WTO deal with the EU (in time !!!), The quick fix temporary FTA's with the US and others and all the blaming of the mess ad hominem to politicians, with lots of infighting being worthy of Shakespeare.
The problem is not the immediate mess... the real problem is that you have no real coherent plan for a stand-alone UK.
With a 2-4 year transition period you stand at least a chance to develop in time such a plan.
A no-deal cliff edge is really a brain-dead way forward.