Election 2024 Part III: Out with the old!

Who do you think will win in November?


  • Total voters
    101
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
It is boring. The ****heads are just coasting along. Trump is an assclown and she's still just terrible.
 
What happened to your regular polling news? Is it less interesting when loser boy is behind?
As I said earlier, with one candidate thrown out and the other shot I don't think the polls are going to be meaningful before the election, and the voting starts in Pennsylvania in 33 days with many other states beginning soon after. Polling under these circumstances would have to have a double-digit margin of error. Just not worth the time to follow.

We'll probably know how it turns out by Thanksgiving.
 
As I said earlier, with one candidate thrown out and the other shot I don't think the polls are going to be meaningful before the election, and the voting starts in Pennsylvania in 33 days with many other states beginning soon after. Polling under these circumstances would have to have a double-digit margin of error. Just not worth the time to follow.

We'll probably know how it turns out by Thanksgiving.


We'll know election day. Trump supporters will just lie about it.
 
We'll know election day. Trump supporters will just lie about it.
I might agree with that last statement. Rarely do you come close to anything I agree with.

One phenomenon worth mentioning. Kamala's giggling and Walz as well. Standing before a euphoric crowd is intoxicating and highly contagious. It was cathartic for the crowds and Democrats all across the country. It is unlikely that such a state can be maintained till November. At some point they will have to campaign. But every vote that goes in the books during this time of Great Relief will be cast under this spell. This will be advantageous to Democrats, and they should do everything possible to avoid having to answer questions as long as they can.
 
Why should they answer questions? Trump never does and that strategy has worked for him.
 
The emails that were stolen by Iran, some of which were negative stuff about Vance apparently, is bound to get out.
 
I might agree with that last statement. Rarely do you come close to anything I agree with.

One phenomenon worth mentioning. Kamala's giggling and Walz as well. Standing before a euphoric crowd is intoxicating and highly contagious. It was cathartic for the crowds and Democrats all across the country. It is unlikely that such a state can be maintained till November. At some point they will have to campaign. But every vote that goes in the books during this time of Great Relief will be cast under this spell. This will be advantageous to Democrats, and they should do everything possible to avoid having to answer questions as long as they can.


Excuses. If Trump does not legitimately win, there will always be some excuses, other than that the majority of voting Americans want someone else.
 
In 2020 Trump clearly won because he got bigger crowds. So the Democrats must have rigged it
In 2024 Harris gets bigger crowds. So if Harris loses, everyone will agree the GOP rigged the election.
 
Election-denialism might as well be a plank in the R platform going forward.
 
Election-denialism might as well be a plank in the R platform going forward.

If current trends continue, "returning to the intent of the framers" by limiting the franchise to property owners will actually be a GOP plank in about ten years' time.
 
Killers gonna paranoid whine.

There's a lot of mirrors in the world. It'd make me paranoid, too.
 
It's just spewing the same crap as university professors. I guess the aim is to indoctrinate those who self-educate. Which, yeah. All the true and real info about the world is going to be written over anyway.

jesse what the fudge are you talking about

In 2020 Trump clearly won because he got bigger crowds. So the Democrats must have rigged it
In 2024 Harris gets bigger crowds. So if Harris loses, everyone will agree the GOP rigged the election.

Oh no you see, Trump is still getting the bigliest crowds, very yuge, that's what they're saying, Donald, your crowds are so big they're the biggest I've ever seen, not like Kamabla and Tampon Tim, their crowds aren't as big as yours, the lying news media is just pretending, they're all so bad and it's fake news.

If current trends continue, "returning to the intent of the framers" by limiting the franchise to property owners will actually be a GOP plank in about ten years' time.

And of course, it would also be "the intent of the framers" for white men to be the only ones allowed to be property owners, while everyone else is only allowed to be property.
 
And of course, it would also be "the intent of the framers" for white men to be the only ones allowed to be property owners, while everyone else is only allowed to be property.
Slavery is not about race.
Slavery has historically been widespread in Africa. Systems of servitude and slavery were once commonplace in parts of Africa, as they were in much of the rest of the ancient and medieval world.[1] When the trans-Saharan slave trade, Red Sea slave trade, Indian Ocean slave trade and Atlantic slave trade (which started in the 16th century) began, many of the pre-existing local African slave systems began supplying captives for slave markets outside Africa.[2][3] Slavery in contemporary Africa is still practised despite it being illegal.

In the relevant literature African slavery is categorized into indigenous slavery and export slavery, depending on whether or not slaves were traded beyond the continent.

Slavery did have a racial component in America, but the institution has been practiced globally for most of human history. Perhaps all of human history. In America today the history of slavery is mostly exploited for political purposes by the liberal/socialist Democrat party.

In my opinion your use of "white men" in this context is racist and somewhat offensive and I would appreciate it if you would cease those kinds of comments so that we may converse in harmony.
 
Last edited:
Slavery is not about race.
Power dynamics in slavery playing out within racial demographics doesn't mean it's not also about race*.

It's funny how opposition to "woke" stuff is always rooted in an inherently oversimplified approach to the subjects that underpin it. But I guess that's why there's all these attacks on "professors" and "education" and so on. Which is a lot less funny, in reality.

* "race" being a very complicated and at-times unhelpful term, but that's a whole other derail.
 
It's the whole picture Lex, you'd have to personalize it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom