Mueller finds more witches

Berzerker said:
If she got elected would the Dems be calling for her impeachment? They're conspicuously quiet about her colluding with Russians.
Click to expand...

Republicans would be running Benghazi, Uranium One, Clinton foundation and Pizza-gate investigations for the next four years
 
Zkribbler said:
Although President Trump insists Mueller's investigation is a witch hunt, it keeps turning up witches.
Click to expand...

You do know where the term "witch hunt" comes from right? It comes from the Salem Witch Trials, which if you'll remember, also resulted in convictions and also kept turning up witches. Are you going to sit there and tell me you think the Salem Witch Trials resulted in legitimate convictions? Are you also going to tell me you think those running those trials must have been on to something because they kept "turning up witches"?

The point being that just because you are getting convictions, doesn't mean those convictions are legitimate. In fact, the fact that Manafort was only convicted on less than half of everything he was charged with should call this whole investigation into question because it shows they are trying to nail people for things they didn't do. They are just shotgun blasting with charges and hoping they can fool a jury into buying into some of them.
 
Berzerker said:
Or we could spend 4 years investigating both Trump and Hillary for colluding with Russians.
Click to expand...

Or we could stop wasting tax payer dollars chasing some outlandish Russian boogeyman conspiracy theory and get back to the business of running this country.
 
Commodore said:
In fact, the fact that Manafort was only convicted on less than half of everything he was charged with should call this whole investigation into question because it shows they are trying to nail people for things they didn't do. They are just shotgun blasting with charges and hoping they can fool a jury into buying into some of them.
Click to expand...
I'm not going to do you the disservice of pretending that you actually believe what you just posted.
Commodore said:
Or we could stop wasting tax payer dollars chasing some outlandish Russian boogeyman conspiracy theory and get back to the business of running this country.
Click to expand...
...okay, never mind, you basically just said "I know you are but what am I" here. "Disservice" isn't the right word.
 
Commodore said:
Or we could stop wasting tax payer dollars chasing some outlandish Russian boogeyman conspiracy theory and get back to the business of running this country.
Click to expand...

Or you could not elected a Moron as President that is gaslighting the FBI, half of the country, our allies and neighbours.
But what are you going to do ? Elect people like Lincoln and FDR into power ?
 
Commodore said:
Or we could stop wasting tax payer dollars chasing some outlandish Russian boogeyman conspiracy theory and get back to the business of running this country.
Click to expand...

I dont think its a waste... I have no problem pointing to the hypocrisy of the 2 parties on their selective outrage but partisanship does serve a purpose. When they get along thats when we waste money, thats when scandals balloon into bank bailouts etc... I remember the '88 election between Bush and Dukakis - Duke learned of the growing S&L problem but his own party - I think 4 of the Keating 5 were powerful Dem senators - told him to shut up. So Bush won, entered office and then told us about the collapse of the S&L industry. Both sides kept it quiet. The only way we find out about anything is by wasting money on investigations.
 
Apparently Cohen's lawyer has just stated he wouldn't accept a pardon from Trump even if it were offered? What do folks think of this? Somehow I don't think joining the #Resistance is going to keep the book from being thrown at Cohen...
 
Dachs said:
Think of it this way: if Cohen is pleading guilty to violating campaign finance laws on Trump's orders, there is zero reason not to convict Trump of violating those same exact laws.
Click to expand...

Despite what I think is probable in the case of Assclown specifically - this is deeply disturbing as laid out. Law enforcement securing a guilty plea that incriminates another individual is not conviction-warranting evidence. Massive hives. I mean, it's the era of anonymous reporting in higher education, maybe society has gone that way. But yipe.
 
Commodore said:
The point being that just because you are getting convictions, doesn't mean those convictions are legitimate. In fact, the fact that Manafort was only convicted on less than half of everything he was charged with should call this whole investigation into question because it shows they are trying to nail people for things they didn't do. They are just shotgun blasting with charges and hoping they can fool a jury into buying into some of them.
Click to expand...

Every single charge required unanimous votes. They were never going to get all 18, all it'd take is one stubborn juror saying no and that charge doesn't make it. The judge worked with the jury and they settled on 8, the rest were unresolved but that says next to nothing about either their legitimacy or not. Your post completely disregards the judicial process lmao.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Birdjaguar
Trump Indicted!
199 200 201
Replies
4K
Views
174K
aelf
aelf
Zkribbler
[RD] Hannity just incited Mueller witnesses to obstruct justice
2 3 4
Replies
67
Views
6K
Timsup2nothin
Timsup2nothin
CruddyLeper
Top 10 Most Brazen War Profiteers named and shamed
2
Replies
25
Views
2K
CruddyLeper
CruddyLeper
Back
Top Bottom