Yeah, -2.1, -2.5 is shockingly left. It's close to being half of being half of completely left.
So, how is slightly left of centre hilarious?Well, that's still left of center...
Oh you poor little under-represented right wingers. My heart bleeds for you. Wait, I'll get the cheese.Though the people on the right mostly don't post as much as the people on the left...
So, how is slightly left of centre hilarious?
edit: Although it not being the communist liberal hippy left wing site you oppressed righties try so desperately portray it to be is a bit comical, I'll grant you that
Oh you poor little under-represented right wingers. My heart bleeds for you. Wait, I'll get the cheese.
Well I took the test and (we need a drumroll smiley)
Economic Left/Right: 3.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.72
I've gone further to the left economically since the first one I took.
EDIT: Actually i've gone further to the left over all.
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.36
Your social score is about the same as mine was when I first took the test. You'll get more Libertarian in time
Of course, since DarthCaesar, who is probably the only user on here other than me and MAYBE Ayn Rand who supports Glenn Beck is only two points further right than Glenn Beck, it goes to show that the test is pretty bad.
ilduce349 is further right than you.
ilduce349 is further right than you.
Just did the political compass and was -1.88 for economics and -3.44 for social.
I never saw myself as a leftie but I think that is just because I may be a leftie by American standards.
There were a lot of questions about gays which would have thrown me to the left socially and lots of leading questions about "big corporations" which threw me to the left economically.
I think the compass is very flawed to be honest. There was only one question on taxes and very few on how a goverment should spend those taxes apart from very obvious leading questions.
Like I think if you are rich and willing to pay for better treatment, well we live in a free market so go for it, but I don't think they should get it at a (part) publicly funded hospital.
Or I think the state should fund some museums/parks if they're not commercially viable but on a case by case basis not just willy nilly.
I don't suppose there are more in depth political compasses I do like the idea of it.
Pat