How did life originate? How did life with hundreds of proteins originate just by chemistry without intelligent design?
not what evolution is for; um, cells developed overtime too. as far as "cell evolution", I've heard stuff about how smaller bacteria/cells got absorbed into being a part of a eukaryotic cell.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endosymbiotic_theory
so that's a start. if you can accept that starting out with a few simple cells can make pretty complicated cells, you're well on your way to envisioning cells beginning to make "life" (note they are already life) forms. And if you can envision very small simple organisms/plant-like structures developing, you're even farther on your way!
How did the DNA code originate? The code is a sophisticated language system with letters and words where the meaning of the words is unrelated to the chemical properties of the letters—just as the information on this page is not a product of the chemical properties of the ink (or pixels on a screen). What other coding system has existed without intelligent design?
what does this ask? besides, DNA code has been mapped reasonably well. If humans can master a large chunk of it, no reason to think there needed to be an "intelligent" design (I'm sure any IDers wouldn't consider human beings to be godly).
How could such errors (mutations) create 3 billion letters of DNA information to change a microbe into a microbiologist? How can scrambling existing DNA information create a new biochemical pathway or nano-machines?
? what is this asking? I don't see why anyone would object to idea that maybe if you scrambled up stuff it could make a new biochemical pathway. I'm sure there's stuff cell theory knows, just Kennigit is ignorant.
Why is natural selection taught as ‘evolution’ as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life?
'Cuz it does explain a lot of diversity of life? As well as provide explanations why the fossil record is as it is (i.e. history of earth's temperature cycles and climate and such to explain why plants/animals/whatever thrived in one period then died in another).
How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate?
Origin is a stupid question to ask. But I'm sure if you accept some theories about cells (realise I am using this word wrong, but I mean the development of simple cells into more complex as well. Of course that doesn't show how cells originated, but some seemingly robust ideas are out there imo of how cells themselves developed) then you could maybe get a better answer.
Living things look like they were designed, so how do evolutionists know that they were not designed? Why should science be restricted to naturalistic causes rather than logical causes?
How do they look designed lol. And when "designed", I hope you mean adapted to their environment and display properties that could be beneficial to help them survive in that environment, and that animals/plants in different environments might display different unique properties because it's catered to their environment.
oh wait a minute, that sounds like something.
How did multi-cellular life originate?
probably already answered, or at least a lot of good solid information out there on how simpler cells could get more complex.
I dunno. whenever animals popped up and got more complex. Meiosis already is there for eukaryotic cells, so the mechanisms for sex was already there. As for why animals started doing it or whatever probably has some explanation out there already. Again, I'm ignorant. But I could see that sexual reproduction does have advantages once mammals and such came about, especially as the female of the species is the only one that has to do childbearing. It seems helpful for half of a population to carry on life as they please.
Why are the (expected) countless millions of transitional fossils missing?
don't think they are bro.
How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years?
Cuz evolution doesn't mean everything has to get replaced, just things can develop into something different afaik. Plus there are conditions to evolution--if you don't have heavy evolutionary pressure then the species could just survive.
How did blind chemistry create mind/intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality?
I'm not sure that some of those things exist to the extent you think
Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated?
Eh, I don't believe in physics either until grand unified theory comes out. I think Earth just is trying to give everyone a hug, why you gotta be saying gravity works "just so"?
Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution? Why do schools and universities teach evolution so dogmatically, stealing time from experimental biology that so benefits humankind?
What?
Why is evolution, a theory about history, taught as if it is the same as this operational science?
wat? It is an operational science?
Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes? If “you can’t teach religion in science classes”, why is evolution taught?
wat? Besides obvious trolling, I don't think someone understands what science is. You gather evidence and work theory around it or make a theory and rigorously test it.
tell me of any religion that does that and I'll let you teach it in a science class.
