Resource icon

Quick Questions and Answers

Overview Discussion
It's the wrong diamond pattern. It always needs to be vertical.
 
Is trading great works permanent Civ6 R&F ?

Is every deal you make except a one time payment of gold in Civ6 R&F for a set number of turns even though it does not appear on the screen ?
 
moors said:
Is trading great works permanent Civ6 R&F ?

Is every deal you make except a one time payment of gold in Civ6 R&F for a set number of turns even though it does not appear on the screen ?
Click to expand...

Great Works, spies and cities are permanent, resources and gold per turn are for 30 turns.
 
So does this patch note mean that the Stadium gives tourism to its city and amenities - to its city and other cities within 6 tiles? It is formulated so weirdly.
"Fixed an issue where the Stadium effects did not match the text.
  • Stadium: +2 Tourism for cities with at least 10 population. +5 tourism to cities with at least 20 population. +2 Entertainment amenities for all cities within 6 tiles. (Now only applies to Stadium and not districts.)"
And what notification icons do they mean and how they changed according to the following note?
  • "Emphasized several notification icons indicating negative game events"
 
Last edited:
Hi, I'm sure this has been addressed before but searching has failed to reveal the answer I'm looking for.
So, my quick question is:
When I build the Eiffel Tower, will it yield +2 appeal to existing neighborhoods?
Thanks for your help!
 
Deobfuscator said:
Hi, I'm sure this has been addressed before but searching has failed to reveal the answer I'm looking for.
So, my quick question is:
When I build the Eiffel Tower, will it yield +2 appeal to existing neighborhoods?
Thanks for your help!
Click to expand...

Yes. Neighborhoods should gain an additional housing if the appeal goes up because of the Eiffel Tower.
 
Thank you.
One more question. A settlers unit belonging to a rival civ (we're friends) has positioned itself inside of my city's borders. It hasn't moved for at least a dozen turns, and it's preventing me from improving that tile. Is there a way for me to boot him out, peacefully?
Thanks again!
 
Deobfuscator said:
Thank you.
One more question. A settlers unit belonging to a rival civ (we're friends) has positioned itself inside of my city's borders. It hasn't moved for at least a dozen turns, and it's preventing me from improving that tile. Is there a way for me to boot him out, peacefully?
Thanks again!
Click to expand...

Do you have an alliance? If not, either make an alliance or give/trade open borders. I've had before that units got stuck in my land with Open Borders messing up. If you do have an alliance or have already given him Open Borders, sorry, no idea. Maybe the opposite would help though, and Open Borders running out might kick the settler away.
 
I can't figure why I can't trade to Toronto, a city state, which is right next door to one of my cities, Fukushima. I can trade to Neapolis which is a bit further to the west but not to Toronto?!?

Spoiler :

emxzn3x.jpg



As you can see, I have a trader in Nagota just across the channel to the south and I still can't trade to Toronto!? Again, I'm able to trade to Neapolis and Gelonus which both are to northwest of Toronto.

Spoiler :
5XrPExZ.jpg


Later into the game finally suddenly I am able to trade with Toronto but I would like to know why I was unable to do so in the first place in order to understand how the whole thing work.
 
Unikornus said:
I can't figure why I can't trade to Toronto, a city state, which is right next door to one of my cities, Fukushima. I can trade to Neapolis which is a bit further to the west but not to Toronto?!?

Spoiler :

emxzn3x.jpg



As you can see, I have a trader in Nagota just across the channel to the south and I still can't trade to Toronto!? Again, I'm able to trade to Neapolis and Gelonus which both are to northwest of Toronto.

Spoiler :
5XrPExZ.jpg


Later into the game finally suddenly I am able to trade with Toronto but I would like to know why I was unable to do so in the first place in order to understand how the whole thing work.
Click to expand...
You can't trade to Toronto because it is not a coastal city. If, being still not a coastal city, it had a Harbor, I guess you could trade to it as well. If e.g. you make a trade route from Nagota to Neapolis and complete it by establishing a trading post in Neapolis, then you will be able to trade to Toronto via Neapolis (which is similar to what happened to you later).
 
Last edited:
Leyrann said:
Do you have an alliance? If not, either make an alliance or give/trade open borders. I've had before that units got stuck in my land with Open Borders messing up. If you do have an alliance or have already given him Open Borders, sorry, no idea. Maybe the opposite would help though, and Open Borders running out might kick the settler away.
Click to expand...

My civ and theirs had an alliance when their settlers arrived at that tile. Then I beat them with my own settlers and founded a new city, right next to the tile their settlers were occupying. Since then, they have yet to move. The alliance has ended, but nothing has changed.

Thanks for your help anyway!
 
KyivanRusCivPlease said:
You can't trade to Toronto because it is not a coastal city. If, being still not a coastal city, it had a Harbor, I guess you could trade to it as well. If e.g. you make a trade route from Nagota to Neapolis and complete it by establishing a trading post in Neapolis, then you will be able to trade to Toronto via Neapolis (which is similar to what happened to you later).
Click to expand...

Mmmm so if I had a trader parked in Fukushima, he would have been able to trade with Toronto since they shared the same land mass?
 
Deobfuscator said:
My civ and theirs had an alliance when their settlers arrived at that tile. Then I beat them with my own settlers and founded a new city, right next to the tile their settlers were occupying. Since then, they have yet to move. The alliance has ended, but nothing has changed.

Thanks for your help anyway!
Click to expand...

In that case I think the Settler just isn't doing anything at the moment. Once the AI is like "I should settle a city", it will start moving the settler.

Not exactly optimal behaviour, but as far as I know that's basically how the AI works.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom