Silverdawn
Prince
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 490
Quick question: Given that districts kill the yields of the tiles you place them on, isn't it always optimal to place them on deserts/other less useful tiles (provided you arent losing any adjacency bonuses)? Or does placing a campus (for instance) in a desert versus a grassland make a difference (other factors remaining the same)?
Putting a district on a tile results in all the base yields becoming 0. So if it had 1 food and 2 production, it now has 0 food and 0 production. Then the yields of whatever the district are are added. So if it is an industrial zone with a couple mines next to it, it could start with 4 production.
The one sort of exception is that the appeal of the underlying tile affects the number of
Putting districts on tiles you are unlikely to improve for farms, mines, etc. does mean deserts and tundra are better places if just considering the underlying tile yields. But normally, the adjacency bonuses or the terrain you happen to get around the city means that you won't do that.
Last edited: