Random Rants 94 I rant at the thread title and shake my fist menacingly.

British people are getting so hard on the G in some dialects they're starting to sound like Russians. Maybe they always have and I'm just noticing, but in YouTube videos I listen to at lunch, there's somethINGK I'm definitely noticing.
 
Adding the K after "-ing" has been part of 'Estuary English' (south/eastern) dialects for decades.
 
Adding the K after "-ing" has been part of 'Estuary English' (south/eastern) dialects for decades.
I would say particularly with somethingk more than other ing endings.
 
Or rather, "sumfink" ;)
 
Hasn't that been around since the 19th century?
 
I am very annoyed when people impersonate celebrities on social media. In a more honest universe, I might have been happy that Sir Derek Jacobi apparently "liked" one of my comments in the I, Claudius group I joined.

But since he's a busy actor and writer, I very much doubt that he's casually reading what a bunch of fans have to say in a fan group and dropping 'likes' on comments that really aren't that profound or creative.

Therefore, it's a bot impersonating him. :huh:
 
It's possible.. :)
I have seen singers comment on YT, a quick like doesn't sound unrealistic these days.

The only people who are celebrities as far as I'm concerned who legitimately replied to my social media comments have been Mercedes Lackey and Leslie Fish. Both of them are science fiction/fantasy authors and filk writers.

Robert Silverberg's email group isn't exactly social media because you have to be a member to participate.

"William Shatner" once dropped a like on one of my FB comments. I know it wasn't really him because his real account explained that there is someone impersonating him. So I very much doubt that "Derek Jacobi" is the real Sir Derek.
 
"William Shatner" once dropped a like on one of my FB comments. I know it wasn't really him because his real account explained that there is someone impersonating him. So I very much doubt that "Derek Jacobi" is the real Sir Derek.
Facebook seems to have a lot of Celebrity impersonators.
 
Writing and medical education

I'm corresponding on Tinder after a long time with a lady who works in the medical field.

I also heard the following objection from her: "You can write a story about a doctor if you are a doctor yourself, or know the field well".

Just like a month ago, when I wanted to write about growing roses, instead of an acquaintance telling me what she likes about gardening, she also told me that you shouldn't write about what you don't know.

I think people have a wrong idea about writers. If I only wrote about what I know extremely well, then all the stories would be about school, chess school, computer games, spiritual development, skateboarding, and a few other topics.

The prerogative of writers is precisely that when interviewing people and studying various areas of life, they write about them through their own prism. Almost all writers do this. I was told about this extensively in my studies of Baltic philology at university.

My flatmate is a nurse. I correspond with a social worker and a gynecologist on a daily basis. My acquaintance is currently studying in his 5th year at the biggest medical university in Latvia. Two acquaintances are fitness trainers.

It is difficult for me to name any of my everyday people who would not be able to name all the organs in a human or would not know what the tonsils or appendix do.

***

In a way, writing is like anthropology - you study groups of people, phenomena in society, highlight some aspects, illuminate them, show them in a new light, everyone is amazed (if you write well).
 
Don't listen to the other people. You've got the right idea. If every author wrote only what he or she knows directly, all we'd have are autobiographies.
 
Last edited:
Writing and medical education

I'm corresponding on Tinder after a long time with a lady who works in the medical field.

I also heard the following objection from her: "You can write a story about a doctor if you are a doctor yourself, or know the field well".

Just like a month ago, when I wanted to write about growing roses, instead of an acquaintance telling me what she likes about gardening, she also told me that you shouldn't write about what you don't know.

I think people have a wrong idea about writers. If I only wrote about what I know extremely well, then all the stories would be about school, chess school, computer games, spiritual development, skateboarding, and a few other topics.

The prerogative of writers is precisely that when interviewing people and studying various areas of life, they write about them through their own prism. Almost all writers do this. I was told about this extensively in my studies of Baltic philology at university.

My flatmate is a nurse. I correspond with a social worker and a gynecologist on a daily basis. My acquaintance is currently studying in his 5th year at the biggest medical university in Latvia. Two acquaintances are fitness trainers.

It is difficult for me to name any of my everyday people who would not be able to name all the organs in a human or would not know what the tonsils or appendix do.

***

In a way, writing is like anthropology - you study groups of people, phenomena in society, highlight some aspects, illuminate them, show them in a new light, everyone is amazed (if you write well).

Exactly. I started doing NaNoWriMo in 2007, when a friend on a gaming forum I used to belong to said, "You like to write, have you thought of trying NaNoWriMo?"

Back then the criteria for a win were much more strict than they are now. It took me NINE YEARS to pull off a win. Nine years of trying and failing to reach that 50,000-word goal, and in some years my word count was zero because I couldn't make my ideas turn into a story.

And then in 2016 I decided to stop what I was doing because it clearly wasn't working. I tried something different - and succeeded. I crossed that 50k threshold, and then some. And by that time, NaNo was doing smaller events in April and July, so I tried those - and succeeded.

November 2017 didn't result in a win because my computer opted to die. But 2018 was the year I started novelizing my favorite computer games - fanfiction, which was finally a recognized and legitimate category that was allowed. 2018 wasn't easy to pull off, but I did it. And I haven't looked back since.

I had to find my niche(s) of what I was good at, what I could sustain interest in, and what I was prepared to do for the rest of the year besides just in November. NaNoWriMo was originally started because a guy named Chris Baty got tired of hearing people say "I'd like to write a book but I don't have the time." He figured out a way to help people make the time, and made it a competition to make it more compelling. It's not that you're competing with anyone else. You've got a goal to meet. If you meet it, you win. If not, you don't.

But even in the years I didn't win, I still learned some things. One of the first things I learned was that just because I might like a particular type of story, it doesn't mean I'm good at writing them myself. So scrap those ideas that went nowhere, because all they do is foster discouragement and self-annoyance.


Writers are often encouraged to "write what you know" and that's why a lot of things I do know and am familiar with make it into my stories. The ones I'm currently working on have main characters who are at least interested in some of the things that have been important in my own life. One of my Fighting Fantasy characters likes music. My main King's Heir character plays and composes music. I couldn't give him an organ to play, since organs weren't around in the century and place where he lived, but I gave him that era's equivalent - an instrument I also know how to play. And then I got the idea that there are other instruments that existed then but I don't know how to play. So... two nights' worth of research later, I decided to expand his abilities and repertoire. Believe it or not, there are YouTube videos with instructions on how to play the spoons.

There are a lot of things I want in these stories that I don't know about, so that's where the research comes in. There's a comic strip where a team of agents monitoring people's internet searches comes up with a list of things a particular individual is searching. Some of it involves weapons, and one agent wonders, "Should we flag this?" The other agent reads off the rest of the list, that includes a variety of historical references, details of what the parts of some obscure 13th century things are, a recipe or two, the history of a particular type of cloth and the garments made from it, a couple of naming sites, and concludes, "Nah, just another fanfiction writer. Harmless."

We do research a tremendous variety of things. There was a thread in the NaNo forums about "the weirdest thing you ever researched for a story". The conversation took an interesting turn when I asked about how much damage unhatched chicken eggs would get from being left out in the rain all day (a scene in the King's Heir computer game; there's a bowl of chicken eggs sitting on the side of a road and it's raining, and the storyline doesn't mention why they're there; it's the sort of weird detail that my mind latched onto, and I decided to have the pov character try to figure it out). This led to a conversation on the forum about how much chicken eggs cost in the 11th century, how valuable chickens were, and I learned some interesting things about that (turns out they're more valuable than I'd thought, which makes it all the more weird that these eggs were just left lying around like that).

But in general when it comes to writing, I like Isaac Asimov's approach. He never met a subject he wouldn't write about, even if he knew nothing about it at the time when an editor or publisher asked him if he could. He'd always say, "Yes" and then head to the library to learn about whatever it was. Then he'd write the article or story.

So the people who say writers should only write what they know are seeking to limit what a writer can do. Granted, there are things I'd never write about because they're things I know I couldn't do justice to. So I leave them to people who can. But there are many other things I could write about if I learned about them first.

That's why I anticipate a great deal of time will be invested in researching so many things for my longer projects. It's no good saying, "I'm going to set a story in the place and time of the Glencoe Massacre" and then make stuff up. That's lazy, it's disrespectful to the people who really did experience that event, it's disrespectful to their descendants, and no self-respecting writer would even think of not researching a historical event they wanted to write about but weren't familiar with.

Writing has become part of my daily life, as Chris Baty hoped it would for people participating in NaNoWriMo. He just wanted to encourage people to write, and it finally worked for me. I've worked on my stories every single day since November 2018. Not one day has gone by that I haven't written something, even if it's only a couple of sentences and a few notes on the back of an envelope. That's more than I had the day before, so I count that as a win. Even if I never do NaNo again, I'll continue to write.
 
Exactly. I started doing NaNoWriMo in 2007, when a friend on a gaming forum I used to belong to said, "You like to write, have you thought of trying NaNoWriMo?"

Back then the criteria for a win were much more strict than they are now. It took me NINE YEARS to pull off a win. Nine years of trying and failing to reach that 50,000-word goal, and in some years my word count was zero because I couldn't make my ideas turn into a story.

And then in 2016 I decided to stop what I was doing because it clearly wasn't working. I tried something different - and succeeded. I crossed that 50k threshold, and then some. And by that time, NaNo was doing smaller events in April and July, so I tried those - and succeeded.

November 2017 didn't result in a win because my computer opted to die. But 2018 was the year I started novelizing my favorite computer games - fanfiction, which was finally a recognized and legitimate category that was allowed. 2018 wasn't easy to pull off, but I did it. And I haven't looked back since.

I had to find my niche(s) of what I was good at, what I could sustain interest in, and what I was prepared to do for the rest of the year besides just in November. NaNoWriMo was originally started because a guy named Chris Baty got tired of hearing people say "I'd like to write a book but I don't have the time." He figured out a way to help people make the time, and made it a competition to make it more compelling. It's not that you're competing with anyone else. You've got a goal to meet. If you meet it, you win. If not, you don't.

But even in the years I didn't win, I still learned some things. One of the first things I learned was that just because I might like a particular type of story, it doesn't mean I'm good at writing them myself. So scrap those ideas that went nowhere, because all they do is foster discouragement and self-annoyance.


Writers are often encouraged to "write what you know" and that's why a lot of things I do know and am familiar with make it into my stories. The ones I'm currently working on have main characters who are at least interested in some of the things that have been important in my own life. One of my Fighting Fantasy characters likes music. My main King's Heir character plays and composes music. I couldn't give him an organ to play, since organs weren't around in the century and place where he lived, but I gave him that era's equivalent - an instrument I also know how to play. And then I got the idea that there are other instruments that existed then but I don't know how to play. So... two nights' worth of research later, I decided to expand his abilities and repertoire. Believe it or not, there are YouTube videos with instructions on how to play the spoons.

There are a lot of things I want in these stories that I don't know about, so that's where the research comes in. There's a comic strip where a team of agents monitoring people's internet searches comes up with a list of things a particular individual is searching. Some of it involves weapons, and one agent wonders, "Should we flag this?" The other agent reads off the rest of the list, that includes a variety of historical references, details of what the parts of some obscure 13th century things are, a recipe or two, the history of a particular type of cloth and the garments made from it, a couple of naming sites, and concludes, "Nah, just another fanfiction writer. Harmless."

We do research a tremendous variety of things. There was a thread in the NaNo forums about "the weirdest thing you ever researched for a story". The conversation took an interesting turn when I asked about how much damage unhatched chicken eggs would get from being left out in the rain all day (a scene in the King's Heir computer game; there's a bowl of chicken eggs sitting on the side of a road and it's raining, and the storyline doesn't mention why they're there; it's the sort of weird detail that my mind latched onto, and I decided to have the pov character try to figure it out). This led to a conversation on the forum about how much chicken eggs cost in the 11th century, how valuable chickens were, and I learned some interesting things about that (turns out they're more valuable than I'd thought, which makes it all the more weird that these eggs were just left lying around like that).

But in general when it comes to writing, I like Isaac Asimov's approach. He never met a subject he wouldn't write about, even if he knew nothing about it at the time when an editor or publisher asked him if he could. He'd always say, "Yes" and then head to the library to learn about whatever it was. Then he'd write the article or story.

So the people who say writers should only write what they know are seeking to limit what a writer can do. Granted, there are things I'd never write about because they're things I know I couldn't do justice to. So I leave them to people who can. But there are many other things I could write about if I learned about them first.

That's why I anticipate a great deal of time will be invested in researching so many things for my longer projects. It's no good saying, "I'm going to set a story in the place and time of the Glencoe Massacre" and then make stuff up. That's lazy, it's disrespectful to the people who really did experience that event, it's disrespectful to their descendants, and no self-respecting writer would even think of not researching a historical event they wanted to write about but weren't familiar with.

Writing has become part of my daily life, as Chris Baty hoped it would for people participating in NaNoWriMo. He just wanted to encourage people to write, and it finally worked for me. I've worked on my stories every single day since November 2018. Not one day has gone by that I haven't written something, even if it's only a couple of sentences and a few notes on the back of an envelope. That's more than I had the day before, so I count that as a win. Even if I never do NaNo again, I'll continue to write.

Thank you so much for this reply. I know/knew your situation with Nanowrimo, but didn't realize you actually have had hard times as well.

For me - I write in a very abstract way. Giving bare bones of story and characters, spending most of the words on ideas. Giving full depth to ideas. People in my stories are as good as their ability to put my ideas into their lives in a practical, common sense way. Therefore my writing mentor gave me a goal to write a story 40 pages long. That's like 20 000 words in Latvian. It is very long. I don't need so many pages to explain my main idea. But he said that I should try writing about people as well, not only ideas. So since Jan 5 2024 I'm on this challenge to write 20 000 words and it's very hard.

I can easily write 10 stories 2 pages each, but not one 40 pages. It is like a bloated song or movie for me. Why use more words if you can use less. That's my hurdle for now.
On the other hand, if I want to publish a book, it has to have at least 100 pages of one coherent plot. And I do want to publish a book within next 3 years.

Everything I write has to be applicable to daily life. For me - having penfriends from all over the world has helped tremendously. I have tried learning languages as well while corresponding and in some cases German/French/Polish came together for me. I mean, I found a common lingua franca with them. But Japanese and Chinese is so different that people from these cultures usually don't find it interesting to converse for long with someone from Eastern Europe.

Japanese find it valuable to go over to USA from time to time, it is very close by plane. Europe is further away. Some industries like fashion are Europe based though.

I wish I could read some of your original work sometime. There has to be something, right?
 
Thank you so much for this reply. I know/knew your situation with Nanowrimo, but didn't realize you actually have had hard times as well.

For me - I write in a very abstract way. Giving bare bones of story and characters, spending most of the words on ideas. Giving full depth to ideas. People in my stories are as good as their ability to put my ideas into their lives in a practical, common sense way. Therefore my writing mentor gave me a goal to write a story 40 pages long. That's like 20 000 words in Latvian. It is very long. I don't need so many pages to explain my main idea. But he said that I should try writing about people as well, not only ideas. So since Jan 5 2024 I'm on this challenge to write 20 000 words and it's very hard.

I can easily write 10 stories 2 pages each, but not one 40 pages. It is like a bloated song or movie for me. Why use more words if you can use less. That's my hurdle for now.
On the other hand, if I want to publish a book, it has to have at least 100 pages of one coherent plot. And I do want to publish a book within next 3 years.

Everything I write has to be applicable to daily life. For me - having penfriends from all over the world has helped tremendously. I have tried learning languages as well while corresponding and in some cases German/French/Polish came together for me. I mean, I found a common lingua franca with them. But Japanese and Chinese is so different that people from these cultures usually don't find it interesting to converse for long with someone from Eastern Europe.

Japanese find it valuable to go over to USA from time to time, it is very close by plane. Europe is further away. Some industries like fashion are Europe based though.

I wish I could read some of your original work sometime. There has to be something, right?
Thank you. :)

Unfortunately, most of my writing isn't online, as it's not edited to my satisfaction. The thing about NaNo is that what you write has to meet the word count, but it doesn't have to be polished and edited. Nobody reads it, after all, other than the author and whoever they might share it with. Some people have gone on to edit and publish their NaNo stories, but people who write in the fanfiction genre can't do that. It would be considered plagiarism and we'd get in a ton of legal trouble. So anything I've written has either stayed on my computer(s), on fanfiction sites, writing sites, or in handwritten form.

I do have some really short things I can dig up to PM to you. One of them depends on the reader being familiar with the novel Dune, by Frank Herbert, and by the Peanuts comic strip by Charles M. Schulz. It's a crossover that popped into my head one day when I mused that what if it was a beagle, rather than a pug dog that was in the 1984 Dune movie - and the Peanuts gang/Dune crossover was born. I only did a short scene so far, just to see if people liked it and if it would work to my satisfaction, and it did. So I'm going to go ahead and do the rest of it. It's by far not the first Dune crossover that's ever been done, nor even the first comedy crossover. The original novel itself is very serious, and one of those books that a person can read 20 times and get new insights with every re-read. But it does lend itself well to humorous parodies.

Unfortunately my own Iron Pen stories from 20 years ago are gone, and that's too bad. I was rather proud of the first one, where the secret theme we had to write about was "Nothing." I needed every minute of those 48 hours to pull off that one. The second one was more fun, but still a challenge to figure out an angle that would help me create a story. The host gave us the theme of "Cabbage" (yep, write a story about cabbage... that's a case when "write what you know" saved me).


What you say about languages reminds me of a typing client I had, back in the 1990s. She was a Cree woman from the local reserve, doing a degree in anthropology at the local college. That's what I did in the 1980s, so I was looking forward to working on her papers. But she phoned one night to cancel, saying she wouldn't be able to do the term paper because of a lack of sources (this was pre-internet). There just wasn't a lot of information on that topic available here, and not enough time for inter-library loan.

I asked her what her topic was, and just about fell off my chair. I'd had the same problem - not much information in the libraries here about the Aztec religion. I'd had to scout around and buy whatever books and articles I could get my hands on... and I still had all of that (I almost never get rid of a book I've bought if it's still in readable condition).

So I offered to let her borrow all this stuff. She could take it home and use it to help her write the paper, which I could type for her and she wouldn't have to risk failing the class (these term papers were worth a large chunk of the final grade). She was shocked that I'd trust her with my books, but I figured that she was highly motivated to take care of them and return them, so I told her that I trusted her with them, and if she wanted to come over in an hour or so, I'd have it all ready.

She did that, wrote the paper, and while some of it covered very familiar ground to me (since I'd taken this course myself a few years earlier), she had a couple of other angles to it that I didn't have - because I'm not indigenous and these points had never occurred to me. She explained to me later that there were times that she found it hard to articulate her ideas in English, because English lacks some of the concepts that her first language, Cree, has. She said she really wished she could write her papers in Cree, to convey all the nuances of what she wanted to say. That's not doable, though, because nobody at the local college was familiar with Cree except other Cree students.
 
Thank you. :)

Unfortunately, most of my writing isn't online, as it's not edited to my satisfaction. The thing about NaNo is that what you write has to meet the word count, but it doesn't have to be polished and edited. Nobody reads it, after all, other than the author and whoever they might share it with. Some people have gone on to edit and publish their NaNo stories, but people who write in the fanfiction genre can't do that. It would be considered plagiarism and we'd get in a ton of legal trouble. So anything I've written has either stayed on my computer(s), on fanfiction sites, writing sites, or in handwritten form.

I do have some really short things I can dig up to PM to you. One of them depends on the reader being familiar with the novel Dune, by Frank Herbert, and by the Peanuts comic strip by Charles M. Schulz. It's a crossover that popped into my head one day when I mused that what if it was a beagle, rather than a pug dog that was in the 1984 Dune movie - and the Peanuts gang/Dune crossover was born. I only did a short scene so far, just to see if people liked it and if it would work to my satisfaction, and it did. So I'm going to go ahead and do the rest of it. It's by far not the first Dune crossover that's ever been done, nor even the first comedy crossover. The original novel itself is very serious, and one of those books that a person can read 20 times and get new insights with every re-read. But it does lend itself well to humorous parodies.

Unfortunately my own Iron Pen stories from 20 years ago are gone, and that's too bad. I was rather proud of the first one, where the secret theme we had to write about was "Nothing." I needed every minute of those 48 hours to pull off that one. The second one was more fun, but still a challenge to figure out an angle that would help me create a story. The host gave us the theme of "Cabbage" (yep, write a story about cabbage... that's a case when "write what you know" saved me).


What you say about languages reminds me of a typing client I had, back in the 1990s. She was a Cree woman from the local reserve, doing a degree in anthropology at the local college. That's what I did in the 1980s, so I was looking forward to working on her papers. But she phoned one night to cancel, saying she wouldn't be able to do the term paper because of a lack of sources (this was pre-internet). There just wasn't a lot of information on that topic available here, and not enough time for inter-library loan.

I asked her what her topic was, and just about fell off my chair. I'd had the same problem - not much information in the libraries here about the Aztec religion. I'd had to scout around and buy whatever books and articles I could get my hands on... and I still had all of that (I almost never get rid of a book I've bought if it's still in readable condition).

So I offered to let her borrow all this stuff. She could take it home and use it to help her write the paper, which I could type for her and she wouldn't have to risk failing the class (these term papers were worth a large chunk of the final grade). She was shocked that I'd trust her with my books, but I figured that she was highly motivated to take care of them and return them, so I told her that I trusted her with them, and if she wanted to come over in an hour or so, I'd have it all ready.

She did that, wrote the paper, and while some of it covered very familiar ground to me (since I'd taken this course myself a few years earlier), she had a couple of other angles to it that I didn't have - because I'm not indigenous and these points had never occurred to me. She explained to me later that there were times that she found it hard to articulate her ideas in English, because English lacks some of the concepts that her first language, Cree, has. She said she really wished she could write her papers in Cree, to convey all the nuances of what she wanted to say. That's not doable, though, because nobody at the local college was familiar with Cree except other Cree students.

Since I read Dune this summer, yes, please forward that story to me. :) It would be greatly appreciated.

One of my main peeves with Dune was how violent whole story was. They had all that tech and they acted like Romans - killing their warlords over and over for a short period of fame until they get assassinated themselves. So some humor would have softened whole thing.

That's amazing! I have had interest in indigenous peoples for a long time myself. I would interview them or ask around about their culture if I had the chance. I have done course on folklore
twice in university. Both as a philology student and as a Latvian language teacher program student.

As for Aztecs - I had books on Norse mythology in USSR period in Latvia, so I knew in my childhood that every pantheistic religion had their own gods. There is a video game called
Zeus which gives options to please gods of Greek origin. Game came out in 2000 though. For Aztec religion my main idea as a child was that I read that they sacrificed people on top of their pyramids while other religions at the time (in Egypt for example) already abandoned human sacrifices and used lambs or wheat instead.

Languages are keys to cultures. I like some words which don't have equivalents in modern English ( Saudade - Portugese, schadenfreude- German, ikigai - Japanese, Jabberwocky - English, but not many use this word in 21st century)
 
every pantheistic religion had their own gods
But the Norse/Germanic religions weren't pantheistic. Did you mean polytheistic?
 
*Laughs in desktop PC*
 
Back
Top Bottom