Estonia should place new markwers that are closer to the Russian side.and arm them with explosives.
Estonia should place new markwers that are closer to the Russian side.and arm them with explosives.
That's up to the guy who started this war. If Putin uses tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine, NATO and the EU will pour money, weapons, and -- taking a tactic used by Russia in the Donbas -- "volunteers." More countries will actually start enforcing sanctions against the Russian economy.I keep reading in the news that Putin is talking about escalation on the one hand and a cease fire on the other. So, if the use of western weapons continue to be used against Crimean or Russia targets are we nearing the escalate to deescalate moment? The use of a tactical nuke?
That's what Moscow does – disseminate mixed messages, creating uncertainty and confusion. Seems to be working.I keep reading in the news that Putin is talking about escalation on the one hand and a cease fire on the other. So, if the use of western weapons continue to be used against Crimean or Russia targets are we nearing the escalate to deescalate moment? The use of a tactical nuke?
IMO more likely is:Putin tries to push in every direction at once to see where he can gain an advantage. I think he is genuinely afraid of too many NATO weapons in the hands of Ukraine if those weapons can be used afgainst Russian targets. Russian power plants, oil and gas entities, airbases, infrastructure, etc, could present a problem for him.
Putin tries to push in every direction at once to see where he can gain an advantage. I think he is genuinely afraid of too many NATO weapons in the hands of Ukraine if those weapons can be used against Russian targets. Russian power plants, oil and gas entities, airbases, infrastructure, etc, could present a problem for him.
An Russia is still becoming apprehensive about the war.IMO more likely is:
1. Rasputitsa is not quite over yet.
2. Russia has options, Ukraine has none.
3. Attacks on Kharkiv force Ukraine to stretch its meagre resources.
4. Ultimately, Odessa is the main target and Kharkiv is a distraction.
But nothing is certain in war, except propaganda.![]()
Straight after meeting Xi Jinping they start with this nibble nibble advance the sea borders provocation.if you do a little digging, you'll notice that "border guards" in Russia are under the jurisdiction of the FSB.
![]()
FSB Border Service of Russia - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I imagine part of their job description similarly involves changing where the map lines are drawn so as to pull their neighbors into inadvertently sparking a crossing incident and painting themselves as the victim, in true espionage fashion.
But that's just my suspicion...
An ex-Chinese soldier now serving in the Russian army in Ukraine:
"Bro, this war is unwinnable. The human cost is too high"
I don't know, Ukraine already hit those targets with homemade long range drones.
The weapons given by NATO would be better only in the case of airbases maybe, but have a shorter range anyway. OTOH they would be more effective on military targets like troops concentration, artillery, depots, bridges...
Honestly I find this to be a very short sighted move by them. Yes, current Russian threats of atomic escalation are hollow. But that is precisely because the current situation does not in fact warrant such a response. If missiles were raining down on Russian cities like Moscow and Putin had to play duck and cover than odds are high his hands would be forced to conclude this war by resorting to all the means at his disposal lest the Russian people dispose of him. So in trying to point out how hollow the threat is they might well be helping fill it up.It appears that Ukraine is determined to show how empty the Russian nuclear threats are. A couple days ago, Ukraine struck Armavir radar complex with UAVs, seriously damaging one of the arrays.
This is ballsy, and very serious move. As the radar station is part of the early warning system against long range ballistic missiles, had it been done by a nuclear-armed nation, it would most likely lead to nuclear escalation. I suppose they're trying to show the west how empty the Russian threats of escalation are in order to lift the restrictions of western weapons use on targets within Russia.
Honestly I find this to be a very short sighted move by them. Yes, current Russian threats of atomic escalation are hollow. But that is precisely because the current situation does not in fact warrant such a response. If missiles were raining down on Russian cities like Moscow and Putin had to play duck and cover than odds are high his hands would be forced to conclude this war by resorting to all the means at his disposal lest the Russian people dispose of him. So in trying to point out how hollow the threat is they might well be helping fill it up.
The thing that everyone involved needs to understand is that the ukrainians can't win this war conventionally. No amount of foreign weapons and ukrainian willpower is going to result in blue and yellow tanks marching down the streets of Moscow like the ending to a Command and Conquer game.
Realistically speaking it is not even going to result in stopping Russia should they choose to actually go to a full war economy and total mobilization like they did in WW2. Russia just has too much manpower and industry for that to be possible even without the atomic weapons.
Russia will use nuclear weapons only if its invaded, or if its nuclear forces are targeted in something looking like a preparation for a preemptive strike.What is saving the ukrainians and giving them a chance is the fact that Russia can't do that right now because it would be absolutely categorically political suicide for Putin if he did. And as long as this remains true they can bleed the Russians of manpower and equipment while their true potential is hamstrung.
But that only holds true for as long as the Russian people do not feel so threatened by the war that they are willing to go along with it. And bombing Russian cities or worse yet some sort of counter invasion would be precisely the thing to tip that over.
I can agree with that, but I'm afraid Putin is preparing a total (conventional) war, looking beyond Ukraine now.So the only way for the ukrainians to win this is to kill so many Russians and destroy so much of their equipment that victory for Russia becomes impossible without resorting to a total war all the while denying Putin any justification to make it a total war.
This is correct. Ceasefire at the current front lines is exactly the foregone conclusion that makes this a won conflict for Russia. What is the pressure to use nukes? Because Russia is running out of time to conquer all of Ukraine? They absolutely do not need to and never did.IMO more likely is:
1. Rasputitsa is not quite over yet.
2. Russia has options, Ukraine has none.
3. Attacks on Kharkiv force Ukraine to stretch its meagre resources.
4. Ultimately, Odessa is the main target and Kharkiv is a distraction.
But nothing is certain in war, except propaganda.![]()
Russia hits Kharkiv supermarket - authorities
At least two people have been killed and 35 others wounded after Russian forces hit a supermarket in the northern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv with two glide bombs, local officials say.
A large fire can be seen raging at the Epicentr K home improvement store on the northern outskirts of the city.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said over 200 people could have been inside the supermarket when it was attacked.
Kharkiv Mayor Ihor Terekhov wrote on Telegram: "A large number of people are missing. This is pure terrorism."
President Zelensky added: "This strike on Kharkiv is another manifestation of Russian madness.
"Only madmen like [Russian President Vladimir] Putin are capable of killing and terrorising people in this way."
The attack will underline the anxiety that Ukrainians feel about not having suitable air defences.
Mr Zelensky reiterated that Ukraine needed to be able to defend itself and needed air defence systems from Western allies.
The attack is another sign of Russia's growing confidence.
Its forces appear to be taking advantage of a window of opportunity to push their advantage while Ukraine waits for further Western weapons to arrive at the front.
Glide bombs are built by adding fold-out wings and satellite navigation to old Soviet bombs. They are cheap but destructive.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg33y9eedz7o