The "New" Wonders Of The World

Chazumi

Trained& Motivated Killer
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
1,254
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070705/ap_on_re_eu/new_seven_wonders

GENEVA, Switzerland - The Great Wall of China, the Colosseum in Rome and Peru's Machu Picchu are leading contenders to be among the new seven wonders of the world, as a massive poll draws to a close with votes already cast by more than 90 million people, organizers say.

As the 8 p.m. EDT Friday voting deadline approaches, the rankings can still change. Also in the top 10 are the Acropolis in Greece, Chichen Itza pyramid in Mexico, Eiffel Tower in Paris, Easter Island, Christ the Redeemer statue in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Taj Mahal in India and Jordan's ancient city of Petra.

The winners will be announced on Saturday in Lisbon, Portugal.

The Great Pyramids of Giza are the only surviving structures from the traditional list of seven wonders of the ancient world. That list was derived from lists of marvels compiled by ancient Greek observers, the best known being Antipater of Sidon, a writer in the 2nd century B.C.

The pyramids have been assured of keeping their status in addition to the new seven wonders after indignant Egyptian officials said it was a disgrace they had to compete for a spot.

The final round of the competition narrowed the field to 20 candidates, and people from every country in the world voted by Internet or phone, said the group organizing the ballot.

"It's so exciting," said Tia B. Viering, spokeswoman for the "New 7 Wonders of the World" campaign. "There are not many things that could bring the world together like global culture ... this is really something that every single person in the world can be interested in."

"This is all about bringing people together, to appreciate each other ... to celebrate diversity," Viering said.

The Colosseum, the Great Wall, Machu Picchu, Taj Mahal and Petra have been among the leaders since January, while the Acropolis and Christ the Redeemer statue made their way up from the middle of the field to the top level, according to latest tallies.

The Statue of Liberty and Sydney Opera House have been sitting in the bottom 10 since the start. Also faring poorly are Cambodia's Angkor Wat temple complex, Russia's Kremlin building and St. Basil's Cathedral, Britain's Stonehenge and the city of Timbuktu in Mali.

The ancient city of Petra in southwestern Jordan — famous for its water tunnels and stone structures carved in the rock — jumped from the middle of the pack to the top seven in January. That was largely thanks to campaigning by the Jordanian royal family and thousands of Jordanians voting by text message over their mobile phones, Viering said.

A surge in voting from the United States, Canada and Europe in recent weeks helped those regions catch up with Latin America and Asia to make the ballot truly global, Viering said.

The campaign was begun in 1999 by Swiss adventurer Bernard Weber, with almost 200 nominations from around the world. The list of candidates was narrowed down to 21 by the start of 2006, then Giza was taken out of the running when it was given an automatic spot. Since organizers started a tour to each site last September, the competition has been heating up.

There is no foolproof way to prevent people from voting more than once for their favorite wonder, but most of the votes are cast by Internet in a system that registers each participant's e-mail address to discourage people from voting twice, Viering said.

"We have a lot of kids (voting) and that trend is continuing ... but we have votes really from every part of the population," she added.

The original list of wonders were concentrated in the Mediterranean and Middle East. Six of them no longer exist: the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, the Statue of Zeus at Olympia, the Temple of Artemis at Ephesus, the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus, the Colossus of Rhodes and the Pharos lighthouse off Alexandria.

After the Egyptian protest, the organizers of the campaign set the pyramids above the competition.

"We absolutely had no problem with this," Viering said. As of Saturday, there will be eight world wonders including the Pyramids of Giza, she said.

Choosing world wonders has been a fascination over the centuries. The U.N. Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, or UNESCO, keeps updating its list of World Heritage Sites, which now totals 851 places. The agency, however, is not involved in the New 7 Wonders project.

Weber's Switzerland-based foundation aims to promote cultural diversity by supporting, preserving and restoring monuments. It relies on private donations and revenue from selling broadcasting rights.

So I probably wouldn't know what half of these were if it were not for Civ IV. Wish I had known so I could have voted though. Stonehenge is my vote, I mean those rocks are just plane creepy... and it's weird they have old and new wonders mixed in. Statue of liberty vs. Machu Pichu? There has to be some sort of level playing ground here...guess we'll find out Saturday.
 
After the Egyptian protest, the organizers of the campaign set the pyramids above the competition.

"We absolutely had no problem with this," Viering said. As of Saturday, there will be eight world wonders including the Pyramids of Giza, she said.

Hahahahahaha Talk about pushovers.
 
Ah, the stubborn Egyptians... still, there's no reason why there has to be 7 wonders of the world; any reasonable number would do.
 
Ah, the stubborn Egyptians... still, there's no reason why there has to be 7 wonders of the world; any reasonable number would do.

Well, if there isn't a set number then there is already the world heritage list.

There has always been seven. The eighth wonder was up to anyone to decide.

What ever respect I had for this endeavor has been lost.
 
"Above" the competition, or "out of" the competition? :rolleyes:

It's the only one left standing, therefore it's the only wonder.

My list would include all Civ II wonders, except the modern ones which I think are a little contrived.
 
So wheres the new 7 wonders? Its already 07/07/07 where I live
 
So wheres the new 7 wonders? Its already 07/07/07 where I live

the results are being announced in Lisbon, Portugal, and I don't see them doing it at midnight, so there's still a bit of waiting to do.

btw, I voted for this a few months back and thought it was pretty interesting, as opposed to most people on this forum who seem to think its stupid or irrelevant.
 
Oh dear. Quite a few of my low choices are high placed. It seems that the world disagrees with me. Again.
The colosseum really isn't impressive. It's quite large, but also quite ruined. It's only marginally better than any other 2,000 year old monument of Roman or Greek culture. As the symbolic representative of the Roman empire and its achievements it's important, but a wonder in itself, no.
Similarly for the Acropolis. It's just ruins. Maybe if the Turks hadn't blown the place up it'd be impressive, but it's not.
I haven't been to Chichen Itza, but again it looks rather little.

I like Petra, the Great Wall and Stonehenge. Stonehenge is probably the oldest, being perhaps 6,000 years old.
 
the results are being announced in Lisbon, Portugal, and I don't see them doing it at midnight, so there's still a bit of waiting to do.

btw, I voted for this a few months back and thought it was pretty interesting, as opposed to most people on this forum who seem to think its stupid or irrelevant.

I voted as well, I merely want to see if any of my favorites got in
 
The colosseum really isn't impressive. It's quite large, but also quite ruined. It's only marginally better than any other 2,000 year old monument of Roman or Greek culture. As the symbolic representative of the Roman empire and its achievements it's important, but a wonder in itself, no.
I agree, the Pantheon is a much better - and intact - symbol of the Roman Empire.

Similarly for the Acropolis. It's just ruins. Maybe if the Turks hadn't blown the place up it'd be impressive, but it's not.
Well technically it was the Maltese that blew it up, but the Turks weren't thinking too hard when they made it an ammo dump in the first place.

I haven't been to Chichen Itza, but again it looks rather little.
It is big, very big.

I like Petra, the Great Wall and Stonehenge. Stonehenge is probably the oldest, being perhaps 6,000 years old.


I thought they had dated the Pyramids to be older than that?

Personally, I don't find the Great Wall that impressive. Yeah, it's really cool, but it's not really a whole lot more than that.

I've no idea what Petra is. *runs off to Google it*
 
Presenting Petra:


I think it was used in one of the Indiana Jones films
 
Out of the 21 choices, here would be my bets on the winners
  • Acropolis
  • Angkor Wat
  • Chichen Itza
  • Collosseum
  • Eiffel Tower
  • Great Wall
  • Taj Mahal

These are in my opinion those who fit the best the different wonders criteria : They are worldwide notoriously famous, they are huge sructures, they are especially impressive considering the time they've been built. So I bet those will win the contest.

Now I must say they are not necessarily my favourites. I think the Alhambra is a wonderful site and I would be really glad if it had a spot. As for the US, well despite how honoured I am as a French to see the Statue of Liberty in it, I believe the Empire State Building would have been a better competitor.
 
For some reason, seven is traditionally a lucky number in many societies, but that's no reason to prejudice against historical sites getting their due.

The earliest classical writers pushed the number seven, but so what?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Wonders_of_the_World

Well, if there isn't a set number then there is already the world heritage list.

There has always been seven. The eighth wonder was up to anyone to decide.

What ever respect I had for this endeavor has been lost.
 
For some reason, seven is traditionally a lucky number in many societies, but that's no reason to prejudice against historical sites getting their due.

The earliest classical writers pushed the number seven, but so what?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Wonders_of_the_World
The point is, you need a specific, set in stone number that doesn't change, otherwise you could stick every single building in the world in the "19,342,876,978 wonders of the world" list and have it mean absolutely nothing.

Every building that's added to the list dilutes it and renders each place in it of diminishing value. That's not good for anyone.

"Wouldn't it be nice if everyone got first prize?" :rolleyes:

(P.S. I don't know why I'm so passionate about this...)
 
For some reason, seven is traditionally a lucky number in many societies, but that's no reason to prejudice against historical sites getting their due.

The earliest classical writers pushed the number seven, but so what?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Wonders_of_the_World

If thats how it is then please call the list by its proper name: "The eight wonders of the world from countries who did the most protesting and threw the biggest hissyfits"
 
Top Bottom