amadeus
Bishop of Bio-Dome
Look up Enver Hoxha. He managed to take Europe's poorest country and keep it there.
I don't know Jaruzelski could be up there but Ulbricht, Gottwald, and Hoxha aren't.
*waits for one particular user to leap to the defense of Ulbricht as a great man and Hoxha as misunderstood...*
Hm... You must be kidding, do you not?And he was also much more before communism was invented. And as King of Poland he is Monarch rather than commie.
Look up Enver Hoxha. He managed to take Europe's poorest country and keep it there.
I don't know Jaruzelski could be up there but Ulbricht, Gottwald, and Hoxha aren't.
*waits for one particular user to leap to the defense of Ulbricht as a great man and Hoxha as misunderstood...*
Seriously, and not engaging in that ridiculous semantics war that annoys me to all Hell, Mao, Stalin and Pol Pot are the worst, simply because they were all butchers. Stalin does get some kudos for his victory at all costs platform though.
I thought it was Mao, a combination of his 'Great Leap Forward', the Long March, and the Cultural Revolution?Stalin killed the most.
Given that most of the problems arose from wilful and concious deviations from the road-maps that he actually drew, I would suggest that it is more complicated than that.Marx, because he started it, but didn't do a good enough job to give a proper road map to his followers.
Is Pol Pot even a commie, really? He pretty much had his own nutjob scheme which as best tangentially related to anything Marx ever wrote.Um, where the hell is Pol Pot.
Poll fail.
Actually, the North Koreans excised any references to Marxism from their constitution in the early '90s. Now they are officially Juche, and Juche alone.Kim Jong Il got a poor country and made it poorer. Both were/are Stalinist anyway, so they both sucked.
There's a difference between failing to bring about Socialism and not being a Socialist.inb4 "none of them were true commies"