2020 US Election (Part 3)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Neither am I marriage wouldn't be consummated.

I just thought sticking you in a purple dress would be hilarious.

Once we annex Australia (peacefully) you're outnumbered alot.

We'll fake some claims on North Africa, Greece, Gallipoli, Italy. Works for everyone else.

Nova Romanum Zealandia.

I don't 3 or 4 million people is enough of a population to get a great global empire rolling from with any degree of speed and quick traction nowadays. Plus, your Maoris would probably be the ones who'd make your best soldiers - judging by the haka dances and the way they play Rugby - and they'd want to completely renegotiate the Treaty of Waitangi to play such a pivotal role - especially once they were armed to the teeth.
 
with footage only being caught far after the initial fire. It's pretty much indicative of US fighters shooting it down
:dubious: Bullets do not cause fire. :shake:

After all, the passenger roster of the Hindenburg had a lot of members from both Nazi Germany and the U.S. - but suspiciously, not a single Soviet citizen! :p

An airship flying from Germany to the US having German and Americans on board is 'suspicious'? :dubious: It also had no Brazilians, no Afrikaners, and no Kiwis. :wallbash:
 
I don't 3 or 4 million people is enough of a population to get a great global empire rolling from with any degree of speed and quick traction nowadays. Plus, your Maoris would probably be the ones who'd make your best soldiers - judging by the haka dances and the way they play Rugby - and they'd want to completely renegotiate the Treaty of Waitangi to play such a pivotal role - especially once they were armed to the teeth.

They're already armed to the teeth I think they make up a huge chunk of the infantry.

Besides we don't have to conquer anyone. It's voluntary Imperialism although it's theoretically possible to join Australia legally.

It's not "join us or die" it's "pay us a modern sum of money and we'll run your country for you".

We have cookies (best ones are Aussie, details details).

It's my delusion let me be;). It's like "the American dream".
 
That's not the parties. That's the unintended effect of the winner takes all nature of the election.

There is winner takes all, yes. But the Duopoly parties are abusing the power of incumbency in a way to stymy, inhibit, suppress, and otherwise make life miserable for Third Party candidates by completely controlling the rules around ballot access, funding, and registration, having Duopoly party Primaries handled by national, taxpayer-funded elections, but all other Primaries or nominations held private, and thus easily marginalized, running "party registry," through public electoral services (itself a dystopian, Orwellian, disturbing system as a backdoor violation to the secret ballot and voter confidentiality that is a bedrock of Democracy in the modern world), and most Third Parties have no recognition on such registry, but are nebulous, "Independents," backdoor deals with media barons lead to vast coverage of the Duopoly, and almost done of anyone else, the FEC and Federal Justices, whose analogous role is Nonpartisan (as they should be) in most First World Nations, are blatantly partisan (to the point of thoroughly compromising the credibility of their position and every action taken within), and strictly DUOPOLY partisan, to boot. Incumbency is indeed abused thoroughly - about as much as United Russia does in Russia and the ZANU-PF does in Zimbabwe - their are just TWO benefitting crooked and power-abusive incumbent parties, and not just one.
 
There is winner takes all, yes. But the Duopoly parties are abusing the power of incumbency in a way to stymy, inhibit, suppress, and otherwise make life miserable for Third Party candidates by completely controlling the rules around ballot access, funding, and registration, having Duopoly party Primaries handled by national, taxpayer-funded elections, but all other Primaries or nominations held private, and thus easily marginalized, running "party registry," through public electoral services (itself a dystopian, Orwellian, disturbing system as a backdoor violation to the secret ballot and voter confidentiality that is a bedrock of Democracy in the modern world), and most Third Parties have no recognition on such registry, but are nebulous, "Independents," backdoor deals with media barons lead to vast coverage of the Duopoly, and almost done of anyone else, the FEC and Federal Justices, whose analogous role is Nonpartisan (as they should be) in most First World Nations, are blatantly partisan (to the point of thoroughly compromising the credibility of their position and every action taken within), and strictly DUOPOLY partisan, to boot. Incumbency is indeed abused thoroughly - about as much as United Russia does in Russia and the ZANU-PF does in Zimbabwe - their are just TWO benefitting crooked and power-abusive incumbent parties, and not just one.

Even if they had proportional systems the two big parties would still dominate.

Hell Trump could win in a proportional system.
 
But the Duopoly parties are abusing the power of incumbency in a way to stymy, inhibit, suppress, and otherwise make life miserable for Third Party candidates by completely controlling the rules around ballot access, funding, and registration, having Duopoly party Primaries handled by national, taxpayer-funded elections, but all other Primaries or nominations held private, and thus easily marginalized, running "party registry," through public electoral services (itself a dystopian, Orwellian, disturbing system as a backdoor violation to the secret ballot and voter confidentiality that is a bedrock of Democracy in the modern world), and most Third Parties have no recognition on such registry, but are nebulous, "Independents," backdoor deals with media barons lead to vast coverage of the Duopoly, and almost done of anyone else, the FEC and Federal Justices, whose analogous role is Nonpartisan (as they should be) in most First World Nations, are blatantly partisan (to the point of thoroughly compromising the credibility of their position and every action taken within), and strictly DUOPOLY partisan, to boot.

Ok are you aware this is all one sentence
 
Last edited:
It's punctuated as two.

The first sentence is six words long.

There's a comma splice before the second "backdoor." Punctuating that correctly would make it three. Another after "else." Punctuating that correctly would make it four.

I wonder a lot about why Patine writes this way. It's one of the things about his posting style that only serves to alienate readers.
 
Last edited:
No! It was the Commies! To get revenge for the Red Scare in the U.S. and the Nazis putting Communists and Socialists - including their hero, Ernst Thalmann, who REALLY beat Hitler at the ballot box in 1933 - into Concentration camps along with Jews, Romani, Homosexuals, pacificistic Christian denominations, non-Whites in Germany, etc.! After all, the passenger roster of the Hindenburg had a lot of members from both Nazi Germany and the U.S. - but suspiciously, not a single Soviet citizen! :p

That would explain everything! We needed an explanation after all, due to something improbable happening, it's necessary to point at what society orchestrated it!
 
It's punctuated as two.

The first sentence is six words long.

There's a comma splice before the second "backdoor." Punctuating that correctly would make it three. Another after "else." Punctuating that correctly would make it four.

I wonder a lot about why Patine writes this way. It's one of the things about his posting style that only serves to alienate readers.

Haha you're right, fixed my quoting
 
Ok are you aware this is all one sentence
Thank you for bringing this up. @Patine posts are so difficult parse that I usually don't bother any more. If he changed his style to be more accessible and have more sentences, he would be less frustrating to talk with.
 
But would he still be Patine, then?

Questions that keep you up at night.
 
Even if they had proportional systems the two big parties would still dominate.

Hell Trump could win in a proportional system.

If the U.S. had proportional representation, and all the institutional tactics of Third Party and Independent candidate suppression were lifted, and the FEC and Federal Justices were mandatorily Nonpartisan, and all party nominations were by private convention, with none through Primaries via the public electoral agencies (basically, addressing all of my concerns), you're statements that the "big parties would still dominate," and, "Trump could win in a proportional system," is still just one your trademark lazy, defeatist, ill-thought-out statements with no veracity, no backing, and just by simple fiat alone. Even if proportionate representation were the only change, your statement remains exactly as I just stated.
 
Fire doesn't kill people. Heat, toxic fumes or lack of oxygen does. With fire.

How many times have you died in a fire? You speak as though from experience. :S
 
Fire = extreme heat + toxic fumes + lack of oxygen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom