Not much else to say except that this is flat-out inaccurate. The Nazis were incredibly racist towards Slavs for the duration of their existence as a party.
The Nazis were racist towards anyone who was not of perceived "aryan" descent. Still, slavs do much better than Jews and Africans:
Nazi propaganda depicted Eastern Europe as racially mixed "Asiatic" that was dominated by the Jews with the aid of Bolshevism.[25] The Nazis considered some people in Eastern Europe to be suitable for Germanization (they were presumed to be of German descent); if they were considered racially valuable they were to be re-Germanized and forcefully taken from their families to Germany and raised as Germans.[22]
Which is probably the best thing that could happen to you as a "non-aryan" under German rule if we are being honest.
Anyway, Hitler denounced the slavs as subhuman as early as 1925 in "Mein Kampf", I am not unaware of that, but at the same time tries to keep relations with the USSR up until he is ready for the invasion, hence me referring to the Hitler-Stalin-pact.
This is exactly what I meant by "opportunist racism"; There are too many of these instances than one can count, like for example this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German–Turkish_Non-Aggression_Pact
Clearly Hitler didn't think too highly of the Turks as a race either, but if they're friendly, suddenly they fit into the ideology. Racial relations are molded depending on who was an ally at the time.
"Hitler, preparing to invade the Soviet Union, diverted attention to make sure the southern or Balkan flank was secure. Rumania was under heavy pressure, and was forced to cede 40,000 square miles of territory with 4 million people to the USSR, Hungary and Bulgaria; German troops came in to protect the vital oil fields (Germany's only source of oil besides the USSR). Romania signed the Axis Pact and became a German ally (November 1940).[124] So too did Hungary (November 1940) and Bulgaria (March, 1941)."
While most of these eastern-European countries are mostly "ethnically slavs", they were seen as and called "aryans", just because they became allies.
The Japanese allies, as well as the Chinese, were declared "honorary aryan", which is a completely meaningless term, but was needed to somehow ideologically justify them not being lesser humans. I quote:
"While only certain Jewish individuals were granted the status (of honorary aryan), the term was ascribed to the entire Japanese and Chinese people. Adolf Hitler bestowed the title upon the Japanese following the Anti-Comintern Pact on Communism (signed in 1936), and it seemed that they were granted the status not simply for economic, military, or political reasons, but more so because of their racial integrity. In The Political Testament of Adolf Hitler, Hitler stated:
Pride in one's own race – and that does not imply contempt for other races – is also a normal and healthy sentiment. I have never regarded the Chinese or the Japanese as being inferior to ourselves. They belong to ancient civilizations, and I admit freely that their past history is superior to our own. They have the right to be proud of their past, just as we have the right to be proud of the civilization to which we belong. Indeed, I believe the more steadfast the Chinese and the Japanese remain in their pride of race, the easier I shall find it to get on with them.[5]".
(From:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honorary_Aryan#To_the_Chinese_and_Japanese)
Here is a quote in which the a social darwinist "researcher" claims (mixed) South Americans (as you know, many Nazis fled to Latin America after WW2) and certain "Berbers" (how convenient that they were allies) as "true aryans":
"Outside of Europe in North Africa, according to Alfred Rosenberg's racial theories (The Myth of the Twentieth Century), some of the Berbers, particularly the Kabyles, were to be classified as Aryans.[75] The Nazis portrayed Swedes, the Afrikaaners who are white European descendants of Dutch-speaking Boers in South Africa and higher-degree Northern/Western Europeans of South America (mainly from Uruguay, Brazil and Argentina) as ideal "Aryans"
I think I have thoroughly proven the point that the term "aryan" could be described to just about anyone at any point who was friendly to the Nazi regime, while the term "subhuman" was used just as arbitrarily for anyone who was considered an enemy, hence me saying that Hitler's racism was purely opportunistic in its basis, much unlike Trump, who seems like a genuine racist (to me).
This is a laugh. Trump is not remotely a 'free market capitalist', he's a businessmen who's relied on government propping his entire career - much like the large business conglomerates under the Third Reich.
Note that I never called him a free market capitalist at all, I simply said he is a self declared businessman. Not a successful businessman, but certainly not a convinced socialist either.
Now I'm not saying that Nazi Germany was socialist, because it wasn't, but national socialism in its pure form is most definitely socialist. Maybe if it wasn't for the Night of the Long Knives it would have been more socialist, but at this point it is impossible to tell.
This. As far as I know, the only case where Nazis opportunistically changed their attitude towards particular nation, was Japan, after it joined Axis.
Come on now. There were even Jews with the title of "honorary aryan". You cannot possibly be more contradictory than that, no?
