I have vaccine-hesitant people in my life who're at strong odds of dying because of the errors we've made during this. It's all academic. It's all political. It's all an intersection between politics, the actual underlying biology, and human factors. I can't control the biology or the politics, the best I can notice is the human factors. There have been a lot of errors made. We've definitely been underserved, despite partisan politics muddying the waters.It's less academic if you've had it.
I have different conversations elsewhere, and this forum is a bit of an echo-chamber, but refusing to acknowledge natural immunity really is a potential problem. The science on it will actually be reasonably clear, relative to the value of any specific double-vax mandate, so it will mostly be a question as to whether it's perceived as goalposts shifting. The conversation will probably parallel boosters. Now, granted, when I say "potential problem", I'm also referring to the next pandemic we're going to bungle. We're also going to have conversations about where the burden of proof is.
On the back-end, the technical infrastructure to show a previous positive test as well as being able to show vaccination status is probably pretty tough to do, if only because they're different information silos, even if governed by similar institutions.