Oh, didn't notice that. Well then, destroying Cuzco then? Let all be in the name of modernization..![]()
Tonight I'll post a map with a proposal with correct city names, because they're currently terrible, and resource placement.
What exactly is Daibul? I can't find any reference to it on the interenet. I would instead recommend using a city that was conquered by Muslim invaders in the Sindh, such as one of the ones from SoI.
@ Leoreth, what is the exact definition of the Eastern Mediterranean for the purpose of the UHV?Why does the Turks 2nd UHV not include Greece, or Algera/Tunisia?
Also don't you think having 4 wonders in Istanbul is a bit too fast to be done by 1550?
And finally, can you please remove the rock from underneath, Tisfun/Bagdad, it looks really bad, and its annoying that you can't build a quarry on it. Also please remove Islam from Samarkand, as Arabia spawns without Islam, hence making the existance of Samarkand awfully awkward, especially considering the times when Arabia does not conquer Central Asia, and Islam does not spread there. In my opinion, it should spawn in Kashgar sometime around the 10th century.
And finally, why on earth do the Mughals spawn in 1210 AD??
Daibul is the Arabic name for Debal; It was the most important port ciy in Sindh up until modern times. It was one of the first cities conquered by Muhammad bin Qasim on his expedition to Sind. The city is now part of Karachi.
Heres the wiki page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debal
Because they also represent the Delhi Sultanate.
Well, can you explain to me how you can have an Arabic name for a city, before the Arabs even get there. Also has the article says, the city was administered, by Mansura and laterr Thatta, so why not just have Thatta as the city, and later rename it Karachi. That makes the most sense.
Ok... but can you explain to me how the Mughals = Delhi Sultanate? They have nothing in common, except that they were both Muslim. This needs to be revised, as it is dreadfully wrong. Also the fact that the "Delhi Sultanate" is able to capture Southern India so easily, needs to also be quickly revised, with stronger independents, as well as a nerfing of the "Delhi Sultanate" who IMO would be better represented as an independent state (like the original Byzantines)
PS. Leoreth, does Ottoman Konstatinyye change its name in 1900's to Istanbul, like Edo to Tokyo?
You don't have to conquer a city to have a name for it. Arab traders had been trading all along the Indian Ocean centuries before Islam. To answer your second question, Mansura is too far inland and does not have a modern day equivalent; Thatta on the other hand is near the coast but not exactly on it so it is possible but I don't see a reason why Debal is a bad choice since the city is a direct predecessor of Karachi unlike Thatta, and has been the main port of the Sindh for centuries.Well, can you explain to me how you can have an Arabic name for a city, before the Arabs even get there. Also has the article says, the city was administered, by Mansura and laterr Thatta, so why not just have Thatta as the city, and later rename it Karachi. That makes the most sense.
Ok... but can you explain to me how the Mughals = Delhi Sultanate? They have nothing in common, except that they were both Muslim. This needs to be revised, as it is dreadfully wrong. Also the fact that the "Delhi Sultanate" is able to capture Southern India so easily, needs to also be quickly revised, with stronger independents, as well as a nerfing of the "Delhi Sultanate" who IMO would be better represented as an independent state (like the original Byzantines)
with stronger independents, as well as a nerfing of the "Delhi Sultanate" who IMO would be better represented as an independent state
*snip*
@ Leoreth, I do think that the Mughals need a serious tech nerf; they are usually as advanced as the Europeans which was not the case. It might have been true of the Chinese but I do not know of any significant advantages made by the Delhi Sultanate or the Mughals in the various fields of science or their adoption of those things except in the case of gunpowder. I also usually see tons of Mughal caravals by the 1600s, as far as i know the Mughal navy was very insignificant and meagre as demanstrated by the Mugal-Portuguese encounters in the Indian Ocean.
What J. Pride said - I initially was wary of this city as well because the references to it are rare, but out of the Sindhi cities it makes most sense because it has continuity to the most important modern Sindhi city.What exactly is Daibul? I can't find any reference to it on the interenet. I would instead recommend using a city that was conquered by Muslim invaders in the Sindh, such as one of the ones from SoI.
It does, Greece and Tunisia are at the coast of the Eastern Mediterranean, aren't they? Algeria is not in, but Ottoman control there wasn't that strong anyway.Why does the Turks 2nd UHV not include Greece, or Algera/Tunisia?
Remember that at least in 600 AD Konstantinoupolis already has two wonders. So you're encouraged to move your capital there, and building two wonders isn't that much of a problem if you can get at least one GE (I've completed the historical route with Topkapi Palace and Blue Mosque, but Sankore would've also been an option).Also don't you think having 4 wonders in Istanbul is a bit too fast to be done by 1550?
Delhi Sultanate. You should try to rid yourself of a dynastic perception of civilizations. They represent Muslim India in its various incarnations: Delhi, Mughals, Pakistan.And finally, why on earth do the Mughals spawn in 1210 AD??
How large was their empire at this point?PS. Ya, lolol the Mongols were twice the first people to find Liberalism, instead of the English or French, which was a tad funny/annoying : P
That actually makes no sense at all, because Thatta and Karachi are completely different cities.Well, can you explain to me how you can have an Arabic name for a city, before the Arabs even get there. Also has the article says, the city was administered, by Mansura and laterr Thatta, so why not just have Thatta as the city, and later rename it Karachi. That makes the most sense.
They don't.Also the fact that the "Delhi Sultanate" is able to capture Southern India so easily
Yes.PS. Leoreth, does Ottoman Konstatinyye change its name in 1900's to Istanbul, like Edo to Tokyo?
Only by using the "cycle through civs" cheat: enable cheat mode by entering cheatmode=chipotle into your config file and then press Alt+Z ingame.I'm pretty sure I've asked this before, but does Hotseat work by any chance, it would've been such an imporvement.
I can reduce their naval focus. But how large are they when they get so advanced? Usually the Mughal AI only takes over the Deccan very slowly now.@ Leoreth, I do think that the Mughals need a serious tech nerf; they are usually as advanced as the Europeans which was not the case. It might have been true of the Chinese but I do not know of any significant advantages made by the Delhi Sultanate or the Mughals in the various fields of science or their adoption of those things except in the case of gunpowder. I also usually see tons of Mughal caravals by the 1600s, as far as i know the Mughal navy was very insignificant and meagre as demanstrated by the Mugal-Portuguese encounters in the Indian Ocean.
Forgot to answer that one: everything east of the straits of Sicily, excluding the Adriatic Sea. I also didn't count the Italian tiles although they actually should.@ Leoreth, what is the exact definition of the Eastern Mediterranean for the purpose of the UHV?