The adventurer is sitting, hunched over some parchment, quill in hand. He writes with the careful and considered hand of the seasoned mapmaker, albeit with the occasional twitch of one who has in his time had to pen a few ransom letters under extreme duress, sometimes from orcs.
I'M JUST SPENDING A BIT OF TIME TALLYING UP THE ACCUSATIONS FROM THE LAST COUPLE OF DAYS, BECAUSE AS WELL AS MY BRAWN, MY BRAWN, MY AMAZING HAIR AND OF COURSE MY MIGHTY BRAWN, I ALSO HAVE BRAINS TO SPARE!!!!!
SO FAR THE VOTE THAT STANDS OUT THE MOST AS BEING UNUSUAL IS THIS ONE:
[Backwards Logic vote was here]
THE SITUATION AT THAT POINT WAS: NINTZ 2, CHOXORN 2, A BUNCH OF OTHERS (NOT INCLUDING FROZEN) 1, ROBBIECON 4.
BOTH FROZEN AND CHOXORN VOTED FOR ROBBIECON ON SIMILARLY WEAK REASONING.
BACKWARDS LOGIC COULD HAVE PUT A LOT OF PRESSURE ON CHOXORN, BY PLACING A VOTE AGAINST HIS NAME. INSTEAD, HE WASTED IT ON FROZEN, WHO WAS IN NO DANGER OF BEING LYNCHED.
SO ROBBIE WAS LYNCHED, AS YOU KNOW. THE FOLLOWING DAY, BACKWARDS LOGIC WAS STRAIGHT OUT OF THE BLOCKS - WITH A VOTE FOR CHOXORN, NOW SAFE FROM IMMEDIATE DANGER. (HE REMOVED THAT VOTE SOON AFTERWARDS.)
BACKWARDS'S VOTE WAS ONE WITH NO CONVICTION. WHETHER THIS IS BECAUSE HE IS SOMEHOW 'IN LEAGUE' WITH CHOXORN, OR, MORE LIKELY IN MY EYES, IF HE SIMPLY WANTED TO BE SEEN TO BE AGAINST A LATE-DAY BANDWAGON WITHOUT DOING ANYTHING TO SET IT OFF COURSE, I DON'T KNOW. EITHER WAY, HE DESERVES MY INITIAL VOTE FOR TODAY AND I WOULD QUITE LIKE TO KNOW WHAT HIS REASONING WAS. AND WHAT HE'S CURRENTLY THINKING, TOO. SO FAR HE'S BEEN VOTING THE OCCASIONAL MANA TO HIMSELF AND ARGUING WITH ASKTHEPIZZAGUY, BOTH RATHER EASY THINGS TO DO!!!!