Postmortem on Mueller

He knows exactly what he he implied, yet he chose to say it anyway.
He does know what he's saying. He has chosen to say it anyway. His choosing to say it in that way is in service of right-wing propaganda on this matter. Donald Trump was not spied on. The FBI investigates possible criminal offenses. They had grounds to do so with the Trump campaign.
 
Once again, the Rule of Law enthusiasts are out in force, trying to cast legitimate law enforcement activity, supported by warrants with the constitutionally mandated process attached, as somehow not legitimate.

God, I just love how freaking hypocritical this is. People are exposing their brain rot by defending these clowns out of pure partisanship, not realizing that the rest of the world isn't affected by similar partisan brain rot.
 
In a Republican's mouth Rule of Law means putting black and brown people in jail and not much else.
 
Once again, the Rule of Law enthusiasts are out in force, trying to cast legitimate law enforcement activity, supported by warrants with the constitutionally mandated process attached, as somehow not legitimate. God, I just love how freaking hypocritical this is. People are exposing their brain rot by defending these clowns out of pure partisanship, not realizing that the rest of the world isn't affected by similar partisan brain rot.
Legitimate law enforcement activity complies with the 4th Amendment. We do not have the probable cause for the original Comey era investigation. It's not a poison tree. It's a poison forest. Then there are the last four words of the Mueller report. They directly indicate the assumption that Trump was guilty. Presumed innocent is the standard of any "legitimate law enforcement activity, supported by warrants with the constitutionally mandated process." If you are backing the Mueller report, you are backing the rule of get-Trump-at-any-cost not the rule of law.

J
 
Cfc is a left wing hate site when we have weekly race realism threads by non racists who seek to seperate racial ideology which has sparked innumerable genocides but I am sure it works this time.

Literally the only way you can believe this is if your main source is Trump tweets.

I don't get why right wingers cry so much. Maybe they are losing in the marketplace they so cherish so much and should pull themselves up by their bootstraps.

And I say this when I got plotted more far right that anyone else besides the people that probably are too embarrassed to do so.
 
I just want to discuss it in a more focus thread, because so many discussion that happened in this forum, somehow getting derailed then stuck discussing that issue, so I think it deserves its special thread.
 
Oh, sorry. I wasn't actually riffing on that thread in particular, but just the many I've seen in the past.

Also, the inevitability of the replies that bring in that kind, lol.

Do not take my quip to heart; I do browse some more right leaning places than here, and thus have seen quite a few racistbutnotreally posts; key word: diversity. However, seeing it here is a bit more... troubling. I'm not here to censor anyone though. (Ridicule otoh)
 
Former FBI General Counsel James Baker was on Rachel Maddow tonight. They did quite a tango talking about the Steele Dossier and how opposition research became a source for the FBI investigation without mentioning the Clinton campaign.
 
Cfc is a left wing hate site when we have weekly race realism threads by non racists who seek to seperate racial ideology which has sparked innumerable genocides but I am sure it works this time.

Literally the only way you can believe this is if your main source is Trump tweets.

I don't get why right wingers cry so much. Maybe they are losing in the marketplace they so cherish so much and should pull themselves up by their bootstraps.

And I say this when I got plotted more far right that anyone else besides the people that probably are too embarrassed to do so.
Dude. That's some potent ****. be careful with it or your neurons may never speak to you again.

Former FBI General Counsel James Baker was on Rachel Maddow tonight. They did quite a tango talking about the Steele Dossier and how opposition research became a source for the FBI investigation without mentioning the Clinton campaign.
Maddow permit anything that would put Saint Hillary in a bad light? Not in this universe.

J
 
Maddow permit anything that would put Saint Hillary in a bad light? Not in this universe.

J
How would you know if you don't watch MSNBC?
 
Nothing has come from the Steele dossier. Trump has not paid a single Russian hooker anywhere near $130k in rubles to keep quiet about his fetishes.
I didn't realize you kept up to date on the rental charges.

In any event, you cannot say nothing came from the Steele Dossier. Mueller cranked out 400 pages...I see your point.

J
 
Presumed innocent is the standard of any "legitimate law enforcement activity, supported by warrants with the constitutionally mandated process."
Point of order:

Presumed innocent is the standard of any criminal trial.
A criminal investigation arises from probable cause or in proper circumstances from a reasonably articulable suspicion.
 
Back
Top Bottom