Random Thoughts 9: Attack of the Vapid Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
It still feels like March to me, except for the warmer temperatures.

random thought: I can't get over the fact that my joining this forum is an april fool

only noticed last year on the 10th anniversary of me joining
 
Last edited:
Time is not anymore flying.
Before the lockdown, I was pretty active, and a week could feel very long, like that 2 weeks ago was ages.
Now 2 months ago just feels like yesterday. Because nothing is happening.
Meh :/.
There was a tweet from a woman urging a return to the days when women's panties came marked with the days of the week. :yup:
This would work for us men too if we can talk women into walking around in their underwear. :groucho:
 
Yeah, but with this equality thing they'd demand that we walk around in our underwear, and as Farm Boy once posted, not everybody has Nathan Fillion-level good looks. Which, incidentally, also applies to the women.
 
@haroon We have very close CFC cake days and our accounts will both turn 10 this year

That's mean I know this forum for nearly 1/3 of my life, while you perhaps half of your life :lol:. That's a LOT, the longest forum I have ever been in.
 
You'll get my picture, too, Syn-chan.
 
I haven't watched it yet, but I was reading about the technology used in They Shall Not Grow Old, Peter Jackson's restoration and modernization of World War I film footage. Among other things, a computer was used to digitally create interstitial frames in the film, to increase the framerate to what we're accustomed to. The old, hand-cranked cameras filmed at 13 or 15 fps, so you get that weird, old-fashioned, herky-jerky quality, like in a Charlie Chaplin movie. Baseball fans might have seen old footage of Babe Ruth speeding around the bases. (Ironically, when you play a film that was recorded at a low framerate, everybody appears to be going oddly fast - increasing the fps smooths everything out and slows it down, so it looks more natural.)

Anyway, I haven't seen the film yet, but that's not really why I'm here. I'm thinking about whether and how this technology, in another 10-20 years, could be used in something I've long fantasized about: VR for watching live sporting events. Essentially, I'm imagining a VR viewing experience of a live, pro sports event that the viewer can watch, not just from field-level, not even from the sidelines, but from on the field (on the court, in the ring, on the track, wherever). I'm envisioning a dizzying array of hundreds - no, screw it, thousands - of tiny, super-HD cameras, not just ringing the field, but on the players' helmets and uniforms, on the referees. Heck, on the ball. Then a powerful computer would assemble the images into a smooth, real-time view that the viewer could steer around at will.

This is something I've fantasized about for years, maybe decades, basically since I started watching sports and reading and watching sci-fi. Imagine using the holodeck aboard the USS Enterprise to watch the Champions League final, the Superbowl, or a title fight. You wouldn't put yourself in a seat, 300' away and just admire the image quality, would you? You wouldn't even stand on the sidelines, with the coaches. You'd run alongside the players, then fling yourself up into the air for an overhead view, maybe follow the ball like the speeding "bullet cam" in a Sam Raimi movie.

Pure fantasy, obviously.

But then recently I starting seeing CGI technology in movies that not only knocked my socks off, it improved in leaps and bounds right in front of my eyes. The last two weeks I rewatched Tron: Legacy and the "de-aging" technology that was used in that movie is visibly worse, to the untrained eye, than the same technology used in Captain Marvel 8-10 years later.

So then I was thinking about They Shall Not Grow Old, which used CGI to interpret the existing Frames A, C and E and... what... I dunno... somehow calculate or conceive Frames B and D in between, and thinking about what that technology, generations from now (tech generations, not human generations) could be used for, and then I was reminded of my old "live sports in VR" fantasy and the dots all connected.

Yep, lotta time on my hands.
 
I haven't watched it yet, but I was reading about the technology used in They Shall Not Grow Old, Peter Jackson's restoration and modernization of World War I film footage. Among other things, a computer was used to digitally create interstitial frames in the film, to increase the framerate to what we're accustomed to. The old, hand-cranked cameras filmed at 13 or 15 fps, so you get that weird, old-fashioned, herky-jerky quality, like in a Charlie Chaplin movie. Baseball fans might have seen old footage of Babe Ruth speeding around the bases. (Ironically, when you play a film that was recorded at a low framerate, everybody appears to be going oddly fast - increasing the fps smooths everything out and slows it down, so it looks more natural.)
I saw the movie on a small screen and although technically impressive, it didn't look all that great. The interstitial frames looked blurry and the motion didn't really work out. The interstitial frames make the soldiers look like rubbish shapeshifters or someone was running a fisheye lens over the image.
There was an older WWI in Color Documentary (I think narrated by Kenneth Branagh) that I think looked better than Jackson's work. It used fairly basic digital image cleaning technology and color addition.
 
I am 4500 words into one 2500 essay and 6500 words into the other 2500 word essay and I am so overwhelmed.


The good news is that I now know that The Republicans via the Chicago School guys, have known Keynesian proto-MMT ALL ALONG, Milton Friedman since at least the 1940s.
 
@hobbsyoyo your profile is still cerrado. :beer: hope you’re well.
 
I am 4500 words into one 2500 essay and 6500 words into the other 2500 word essay and I am so overwhelmed.
Did you get an all-sugar slurpee at the kwik-e-mart?
Hygro said:
The good news is that I now know that The Republicans via the Chicago School guys, have known Keynesian proto-MMT ALL ALONG, Milton Friedman since at least the 1940s.
My recent rewatch of Ferris Bueller's Day Off reminded me that GHW Bush called the Laffer curve ‘voodoo economics’, which didn't stop him from being a co-perpetrator of trickle-down economics with Reagan and in his own presidency as well.
 
It's OK, hobbs. We can troll you double later so that you don't feel left out. When you're feeling stronger. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom