Check the first page, there's a whole series by North King. What time specifically, and what style?
I love her... tell her that.
Try looking in here for reference. (The maps are a little higher quality than what you're looking for.) It's my favorite historical map repository on the internet.Does anyone have a map of ancient mediterranean + persia?
Well, guys are not the only ones whom have fictional worlds. Above is the proof.
Sure. It doesn't belong to only one person tho... I should know.
You're impossible, you do know that?
A "non earth map" is pretty broad and without qualification. I can have you a "water world" map by later tonight.I would like to make a request for a non-earth map for Matt and I's new edgy and fresh NES. If this humble plea for help isn't answered, you'll all be guilty of killing a great thing in its infancy.
(Please? )
I would like to make a request for a non-earth map for Matt and I's new edgy and fresh NES. If this humble plea for help isn't answered, you'll all be guilty of killing a great thing in its infancy.
(Please? )
I want to be able to do this!!! Simply awesome.Thoughts On (half-scale; very rough; incomplete; segment) Photorealism: Don't.
Spoiler :
Thoughts On (half-scale; very rough; incomplete; segment) Photorealism: Don't.
Spoiler :
A "non earth map" is pretty broad and without qualification. I can have you a "water world" map by later tonight.
Here is a non-Earth map I made.
Con: The process is random, but slow editing is possible.
Pro: You get a neat satellite-style map to go with it.
Just PM me the details of size, water coverage % and average tempreature, in Kelvin preferably.
Thoughts On (half-scale; very rough; incomplete; segment) Photorealism: Don't.
Acquire 21600x21600 imagery. Work with a 8000x4000 map. Copy and paste relevant segments to desired landmass. Use Clone Stamp (~20%) and Healing Brush (~80%) extensively to merge the pieces and generate a more blended land form. Use the oceans as a "cookie cutter" layer on top with landmass removed to ensure coast fit. Surface features are not at "scale" relative to the new planet but no one will much care and trying to operate to scale is an exercise in frustration.I'm curious as to how you applied the satellite imagery, though.
A given continent requires perhaps 4-8 hours of work. It's fastest to build the 8000x4000 landmass layer in the 21600x21600 satellite file. The resultant total file will weigh in at over 700MB. Independent planetary file for working with the 8000x4000 layers will be 100-150MB. Saving takes upwards of 30 seconds. Performance is sluggish on a quadcore with four gigs of RAM. Rendering performance is currently unknown (simply not far enough). Utility is subjective.An earnest conclusion that it's not worth it or hyperbole?
The data in question is 2km/pixel resolution. Cities and land-clearings are routinely visible and must generally be edited out.In any such image how much of what we see is a result of human impact on the environment? e.g., does farmland look noticeably intrinsically different from pasture at that scale, or perhaps even one type of farmland different from another?
In and of itself, the latter. Attempting to directly depict land form changes on the base map is futile/exhaustive.Is this a reasonable way to convey changing information repeatedly, or only a one-off snapshot?