It is indeed amazing how bad, people can make something so inherently good as ice cream into... but then again, raisins pretty much ruin everything they touch.
Last edited:
And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;
Uh, not really. Grapes turn into raisins as they dry out. It is a natural process that we have just found a way to smooth the process for consistent results. In fact for many uses, raisins are better than grapes. Grapes need to be eaten while fresh and they do not keep. Raisins keep far longer and still hold much nutritional value. I see you blame Eve (all women) for the Fall.That's a good example of this world. God makes grapes. Satan makes raisins out of them.
Raisins plain
Raisins in oatmeal
blasphemy!Raisins and chocolate and nuts
Raisin bread
raisns = SatanThat's a good example of this world. God makes grapes. Satan makes raisins out of them.
LOL, I am just quoting the Bible, o winged one, thou quibble with the Almighty.Uh, not really. Grapes turn into raisins as they dry out. It is a natural process that we have just found a way to smooth the process for consistent results. In fact for many uses, raisins are better than grapes. Grapes need to be eaten while fresh and they do not keep. Raisins keep far longer and still hold much nutritional value. I see you blame Eve (all women) for the Fall.
Raisins are an abomination against man and God. The proper use of aged grapes is wine. It is known.Uh, not really. Grapes turn into raisins as they dry out. It is a natural process that we have just found a way to smooth the process for consistent results. In fact for many uses, raisins are better than grapes. Grapes need to be eaten while fresh and they do not keep. Raisins keep far longer and still hold much nutritional value. I see you blame Eve (all women) for the Fall.
Friar Tuck is one (of many) delights in that film... One of my favourite exchanges is when Guy of Gisborne asks the drunken-singing Friar if he would "not find it more difficult to sing with a sword through [his] gullet" and Friar Tuck burp-laughs "Yes... My lord"... classic.But if it wasn't known, then we must've learned!
Spoiler :
"...and you, 10:45. Bring a friend."Friar Tuck is one (of many) delights in that film... One of my favourite exchanges is when Guy of Gisborne asks the drunken-singing Friar if he would "not find it more difficult to sing with a sword through [his] gullet" and Friar Tuck burp-laughs "Yes... My lord"... classic.
What's her end game here anyway? I mean, say Trump wins the election and becomes president. Sure, he is going to be grateful to her for derailing one of the many court cases brought against him in an effort to prevent his rise. But what than? Is she hoping for some massive payout like a supreme court position or minister of law or whatever? That just seems unlikely to me what with the reputation for awfulness she is getting by doing this and the fact that she is basically a nobody outside of the fact she is head of this trial. And yet it has to be something really good because she is going all in on this. It's not like someone intelligent enough to become a judge can be stupid enough to do what she is doing for ideological reasons.This is the opportunity Jack Smith needs to appeal and maybe ask for Cannon's recusal.
He would 100% reward her with a Supreme Court position if one were to come available during a second term of his.s she hoping for some massive payout like a supreme court position
Haha, perhaps you've fallen into the public hysteria and maybe she hasn't.What's her end game here anyway? I mean, say Trump wins the election and becomes president. Sure, he is going to be grateful to her for derailing one of the many court cases brought against him in an effort to prevent his rise. But what than? Is she hoping for some massive payout like a supreme court position or minister of law or whatever? That just seems unlikely to me what with the reputation for awfulness she is getting by doing this and the fact that she is basically a nobody outside of the fact she is head of this trial. And yet it has to be something really good because she is going all in on this. It's not like someone intelligent enough to become a judge can be stupid enough to do what she is doing for ideological reasons.
We don't know her final end game goal, but we do know tht she is making every effort to delay the trial until after the electuion. If Trump wins, then he will order the DOJ to end it completely. That is her current goal.She might well be hoping for a SCOTUS seat even if it is a low probablility. This may be her best chance to increase that possibility. She also might just be so devout a MAGA supporter that she just wants to do every thing she can to help her "god". At this point there is no downside for her to be biased for Trump. Her appointment is for life and her reputation is of little consequence for her future. She has shown herself to be a judge who puts ideology over the law or justice.What's her end game here anyway? I mean, say Trump wins the election and becomes president. Sure, he is going to be grateful to her for derailing one of the many court cases brought against him in an effort to prevent his rise. But what than? Is she hoping for some massive payout like a supreme court position or minister of law or whatever? That just seems unlikely to me what with the reputation for awfulness she is getting by doing this and the fact that she is basically a nobody outside of the fact she is head of this trial. And yet it has to be something really good because she is going all in on this. It's not like someone intelligent enough to become a judge can be stupid enough to do what she is doing for ideological reasons.