Trump received millions more votes in 2020 than Hillary received in 2016.Even Hillary was more popular than Trump.
Trump received millions more votes in 2020 than Hillary received in 2016.Even Hillary was more popular than Trump.
Maybe not, but he did get more than the 1st 30 presidents added together.Joe Biden didn't receive 80 million votes and anyone who believes it is a fool.
Yes, but Hillary ran in 2016 remember?Trump received millions more votes in 2020 than Hillary received in 2016.
I'm not sure if you're making a parody or if you're serious here.The plan was to rig the election with all the fake polling in the run up to it. The mail in ballot fraud, excused by COVID-19. The MSM priming everyone to expect delayed election results (which is typically a giant red flag for election fraud). Then say, "Look, Trump has been completely repudiated. What a reversal."
Problem is they didn't expect Trump to receive millions more votes than Obama did because everyone knows Biden isn't more popular than Obama.
The MSM even called states Trump was leading and guaranteed to win like Alaska days later, while calling states barley leaning Biden early, like AZ. Then froze the voting for several days in extremely tight races in multiple key swing states. All to give the impression on election night that Biden had won a clear victory when really that couldn't be further from the truth.
I know. Trump had such a high turnout MSM had to broadcast the results while they kept counting and accepting ballots after the polls had closed. Predictably they kept "finding" mail in ballots for Biden once they knew how big his deficit was. He's still barely in the lead in many of these swing states. Often only by a few 1000 votes.A whopping 6 million more than Trump.
I know right? After they were told to count the mail in ballots after the other votes were counted, they counted the mail in ballots after the other votes were counted. And they kept on counting the mail in ballots, even when Trump cried: "Hey! I'm in front, stop counting! Except for Arizona, keep counting there!" But they didn't! They just went on and counted all the votes. We all know that you don't count all the votes and then decide who wins the election. Trump decides who wins the election, and he decided that 3 months before the election. If the flipping president says he won the election, he bloody well won the election. Where do these vote counters think they live? In a democracy?I know. Trump had such a high turnout MSM had to broadcast the results while they kept counting after the polls had closed. Predictably they kept "finding" mail in ballots for Biden once they knew how big his deficit was. He's still barely in the lead in many of these swing states. Often only by a few 1000 votes.
they were told to count the mail in ballots after the other votes were counted
They were told by the Repulbicans, so he could have his "I won this!" moment on election day. After he derailed the mail in ballot processing of course. Everyone saw this coming, everyone knew he was going to pull that off. Everyone expected the mail in ballot to favour Biden, since Trump has been saying to his supporters not to vote by mail.How awfully convenient. I wonder why they were told to do that?
Again, that is a load of unsupported bollocksInteresting how MSM just happened to announce the freezing of the counts in many of these swing states at that exact same time too.
Early vote totals on Tuesday night in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin appeared to give President Donald Trump a comfortable edge over former Vice President Joe Biden.
But those numbers were never complete, and those tallies were changing overnight and into Wednesday as mail-in ballots from heavily Democratic areas in those states were counted.
A big reason for the delay: Laws in each state barred election officials from getting a head start on processing and counting the record number of mail-in ballots voters used amid the Covid-19 pandemic.
Take Pennsylvania. The Republican-controlled legislature refused to change state law to allow county election officials to start processing mail-in ballots until 7 a.m. on Election Day. That left local election officials with mountains of absentee ballots to process and count on top of the in-person vote cast on Tuesday.
Oh, so the MSM colluded with the Democrats against Trump to present a desire impression to the public? Of course this wouldn't be election interference? We already know it's collusion. That's self evident.Everyone saw this coming, everyone knew he was going to pull that off. Everyone expected the mail in ballot to favour Biden, since Trump has been saying to his supporters not to vote by mail.
That is asked here, and none of the reasons sound good to me. I really wonder what the real reason is.How awfully convenient. I wonder why they were told to do that?
No, because you're talking bollocks againOh, so the MSM colluded with the Democrats against Trump to present a desire impression to the public? Of course this wouldn't be election interference and collusion would it?
The votes are always counted on election day (except for early voting and absentee ballots). Why should mail in ballots be any different?The Republican-controlled legislature refused to change state law to allow county election officials to start processing mail-in ballots until 7 a.m.
You're a better person than I am Samson.That is asked here, and none of the reasons sound good to me. I really wonder what the real reason is.
You wanted to know why they were counted later, there's your answer. And if it was that way to prevent fraude, well, fraude prevented.The votes are always counted on election day (except for early voting and absentee ballots). Why should mail in ballots be any different?
The count is done on election day and ballots stop coming once the polls close. It's done this way to prevent fraud.
Except that isn't true and Mail in ballots are the same as absentee ballotsAll the votes are always counted on election day (except for early voting and absentee ballots). Why should mail in ballots be any different?
They're not the same. The mail in ballots cast this election were not absentee ballots, or they would have called them that, and then treated them accordingly.Except that isn't true and Mail in ballots are the same as absentee ballots
The votes are always counted on election day (except for early voting and absentee ballots). Why should mail in ballots be any different?
It's the legislatures job to make practical decisions regarding the election process. It's not the president's role to become engaged at such a low level and even if he did libs would be crying about election interference instead.Why did Trump show zero leadership on supporting the USPS starting in January, when we should have known that mail in ballots would be important? Other than Trump misunderstanding his January 23rd briefing, I mean? So, why not in February, other than his administration was claiming that covid was contained? Okay, in March, when everyone knew that we'd need mail-in ballots and that the USPS had been degraded as a priority until then?
They're not the same. The mail in ballots cast this election were not absentee ballots, or they would have called them that, and then treated them accordingly.