adcarrymaokai
Emperor
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2013
- Messages
- 1,616
California takes at least 3 weeks to tally all votes, if not more. So the initial result will certainly be off.
California takes at least 3 weeks to tally all votes, if not more. So the initial result will certainly be off.
Always. California vote by mail requires that your ballot be postmarked no later than election day, so no count is really official until some arcane understanding of the postal system tells them that no more votes will be arriving. I honestly have no idea how they figure that out, but I know in a lot of places it's like six weeks after election day before they will certify the results.
The concern for the Sanders campaign is that Biden will have a lot of admittedly small wins to bellow about and Sanders will be stuck with one big but still unofficial victory to try to keep his momentum going.
That's Sanders problem though. USA is more than California and New York, hell I've been hanging in about it for months.
Popular vote doesn't matter, winning California doesn't really matter.
If Sanders doesn't win California that will be surprising.
The question isn't even really so much "winning" as "winning big." Sanders wants to come out of Tuesday campaigning on "if you don't want a contested convention you have to vote for me," and he needs big wins to be able to make that claim plausible.
It is possible that that is what was driving a lot of Biden's collapsing poll numbers, and if South Carolina is an indicator that people are polling it but not voting it then Tuesday might be a surprise. If Sanders wakes up Wednesday with Biden in a close second position, even if it is just because of slow reporting from California, I don't think he can run the campaign that he wants to run.
Do they not count mail-in ballots until election day? I don't understand why they wouldn't start counting them (but not announcing the tallies) as they come in to help get the final tally faster.Always. California vote by mail requires that your ballot be postmarked no later than election day, so no count is really official until some arcane understanding of the postal system tells them that no more votes will be arriving. I honestly have no idea how they figure that out, but I know in a lot of places it's like six weeks after election day before they will certify the results.
The concern for the Sanders campaign is that Biden will have a lot of admittedly small wins to bellow about and Sanders will be stuck with one big but still unofficial victory to try to keep his momentum going.
I don't agree.Bernie's the only one with much charisma.
"Cheat," "steal," those are really interesting words for "follow the rules."
Following those rules has always lead to the person with the most delegates getting the nomination, now we have most of the DNC political class already talking about "stealing" the nomination from bernie even when he gets the plurality of the vote.
The counting doesn't actually cause the delays. They are actually just waiting for the ballots to come in. The postal service has some process for tracking where they say "all mail postmarked by election day has now been delivered." I have no idea how that works, but that's what they are waiting for.Do they not count mail-in ballots until election day? I don't understand why they wouldn't start counting them (but not announcing the tallies) as they come in to help get the final tally faster.
It really comes down to how much of a lead Sanders has going into the convention in terms of delegates. Going in with 45% of delegates and nobody else above 30%, but with someone besides Sanders winning the nomination is a pretty strong argument for it being 'stolen'.Following those rules has always lead to the person with the most delegates getting the nomination, now we have most of the DNC political class already talking about "stealing" the nomination from bernie even when he gets the plurality of the vote.
It really comes down to how much of a lead Sanders has going into the convention in terms of delegates. Going in with 45% of delegates and nobody else above 30%, but with someone besides Sanders winning the nomination is a pretty strong argument for it being 'stolen'.
Sanders going in with 35% and two other candidates at 30% would make claims of someone else winning making the nomination 'stolen' is a lot harder.
Is it bad to smile a tiny bit when watching this video?
I wonder if the pro-Trumpers considered the fact that pigeons are commonly called "___birds" or "flying rats." Perhaps there is a message in having the bottom feeding scum of the bird world revealed as Trumpists?
What's a wine mom? It's the only one I didn't know beforehand and it's not on Wiktionary (yet).And while we are it, consider me a Russian bot, an incel, a wine mom, a Karen, a boomer, and whatever else. I am embracing all these identities. :^)
What's a wine mom? It's the only one I didn't know beforehand and it's not on Wiktionary (yet).
Wine Moms are detached, withdrawn alcoholic mothers who always go for a bottle of wine than dealing with problems/parenting correctly, all under a veneer of fun and aloofness
Pigeon abuse. Call PETAIs it bad to smile a tiny bit when watching this video?
Thanks.Wine Moms are detached, withdrawn alcoholic mothers who always go for a bottle of wine than dealing with problems/parenting correctly, all under a veneer of fun and aloofness