If you mean as far as a personality, it won’t happen again for at least 25-50 years. That’s why Mike Pence was such a strong VP choice: he is the total opposite of Trump in personality and temperament.When it gets really bad, assumig bloomburg himself isn't, is 2024 when trump 2.0 comes back and wins again because the machine that built him was not dismantled.
Very wrong, any serious & big gambling site has accurate odds cos they avoid being exposed to strong bettors.
If you mean as far as a personality, it won’t happen again for at least 25-50 years. That’s why Mike Pence was such a strong VP choice: he is the total opposite of Trump in personality and temperament.
But Bloomberg is boring! The guy has got the personality of a tryptophan-coated NyQuil tablet. Even his name kind of makes you want to yawn. Saying his name is even kind of boring. Mi...cha...el Bloom...berg.I think seeing one demagogue pull it off successfully would inspire others to do the same. I mean, just look at Bloomberg. One billionaire (supposedly) gets the white house and now he's trying too.
But Bloomberg is boring! The guy has got the personality of a tryptophan-coated NyQuil tablet. Even his name kind of makes you want to yawn. Saying his name is even kind of boring. Mi...cha...el Bloom...berg.
There is no reason to assume any of this.assuming most of Warren's 12% goes to Sanders against Bloomberg or Biden, and some of Buttigieg and Klobuchar's 8-9% goes to him as well
There is no reason to assume any of this.
Someone a while back IIRC it may have been @Lexicus … posted about polls showing that for Warren supporters, their second choice was overwhelmingly Harris, or vice-vesa. Anecdotally speaking, I was in that group for a while. The point is that if voters are largely not ideologically, or policy driven... folks here have been speculating and posting articles, etc., that this is in fact the case for a while now... then if a lot of Warren's supporters have "elect a woman" as a priority, or simply "elect a non cis white male" … Warren dropping out could end up benefitting Klobuchar or Bootyjudge rather than Bernie.
I'm not saying that is going to happen. This is mostly speculation on my part... I just don't buy the notion that Warren and Bernie voters are interchangeable... I've seen too much evidence to the contrary... both statistical and anecdotal... I mean look how quick so many of the original Bernie supporters here were to write off Warren so early in the campaign... What makes folks think that Warren die-hards haven't done the same with Bernie?
I would have figured there is a maximum bet, upon receipt of which the house is allowed to recalculate odds for the next bet, just in case a huge better was inclined to string them together.
I suppose the alternative is that the gambling site itself purchases an ultra-gambling policy, ie, an insurance policy against the event of an uneven payout.
I took a closer look at the details of the marist polls. Bernie and Warren seem to have very different voting bases. Bernie's is young but diverse (more than half of people under 45 selected him as their preferred candidate), male, vs Warren's good numbers with white college educated women. The question is whether they want the same thing but prefer them in different flavors (so they'll join Sanders when Warren drops out), or if they want very different things and only happened to support ideologically similar candidates by chance.
FWIW I don't think Bernie should change tactics/messaging to "attract moderates" or "move to the center"... I think he should just stay on message or double down. He needs to inspire turnout and that takes an inspirational message, not a "practical" one. Plus the folks who want a centrist message aren't accessible to him anyway... It's possible that they may be later when there are fewer of the moderate candidates left and he appears more electable/inevitable...The demographic differences between Sanders and Warren voters are one reason why I'm skeptical that it can be assumed that Warren's voters will join Bernie en masse if Warren drops out. Now, I wouldn't go so far as to say that zero Warren supporters will switch to Bernie, but like @Sommerswerd I think we do not have strong enough reason to just assume that Warren's voters will all go to Bernie, or even that most of them will.
I guess the risk is that voters coalesce around one moderate as others drop out, but that's a risk I think he has to take because he needs to hold his core together to keep winning primaries.
With all due respect, not quite sure whether you agree or disagree with what I said, @Estebonrober. Personality wise, Bloomberg is unfit to go toe-to-toe against Trump.
Biden had it in ‘16, Clinton a close second. This year I think Buttigieg has the best individual personality but doubt he can get the support in the states the Dems need to win the EC.
Remember, I’m not talking about policy so much as I am winning the election. Policy matters but personality matters too.
I'm thinking the establishment/moderates are likely to coalesce around Bootyjudge or Klob in the end. Biden is too old and frail-looking.