I don’t doubt that at all. I’m not saying it’s impossible for their measures to be effective—but what seems to me like a massive hurdle is being able to correctly detect 100% of cases knowing what we think we do about the virus.
Here’s what I mean as an example: not all cases are symptomatic, they don’t develop instantaneously, and what with some symptoms being akin to the common cold or flu, how do you go about isolating, testing, and verifying all of that within a timespan under which such measures could be effective?
New Zealand, the best other performer in terms of quashing local cases has found one turn into... 100? 150? Within like a week. That’s a small country with no land borders and quarantine-upon-arrival. So what I’m trying to figure out is that discrepancy.
If there’s a plausible explanation for it, I’m all ears, because I have no way of explaining it myself.
China has mandatory testing. In western countries, the vast majority (like 80% of infected people before you take into account pandemic fatigue) aren't getting tested.
I've never been tested, and can't imagine I ever will be, the incentives aren't set up for it.